Angled in the time periods depicted on DSC and spin-offs and probably during the original visit to Talos IV also. As for the rest we just don’t know (yet), unless we explicitly switch to a POV behind-the-scenes, where it is clear what one production or another did.
Is the bridge at a funny angle?
- Thread starter Mike Doyle
- Start date
Angled in the time periods depicted on DSC and spin-offs and probably during the original visit to Talos IV also. As for the rest we just don’t know (yet), unless we explicitly switch to a POV behind-the-scenes, where it is clear what one production or another did.
I wonder if the Enterprise is an Autobot or Decepticon?!
Eaves’ comments on the redesign suggest they expected the ship to be refit by the time of TOS, apparently disregarding its similar appearance in “The Cage”, so it’s quite likely we’ll see straight pylons by the end of SNW.
Or TOS and SNW are simply two separate timelines (shows). No matter how much CBS uses TOS to peddle its current wares, the world and TV are decidedly different animals than they were in 1969.
If not at the start, which I'm hoping for.
Again, know the room. What makes you think that people who've been participating in this thread for 45 pages are looking to bring it to an end?
Okay…
You have already earned two warnings for this exact same behavior. But stupid me, I gave you the chance to pull up and stop derailing this thread. What the hell was I thinking?
You’ve earned another warning for trolling and for ignoring moderator instructions. Again. Comments to PM.
I would really encourage you to think about whether or not you’d like to continue being a member here. Because the way you’re headed you won’t be for long.
You’ve also earned another reply ban, so this doesn’t happen here again.
Now that is the end of the discussion.
Autobot. D-7 = Decipticon-7.
Insomuch as I just watched both "Space Seed," and "Metamorphosis" recently, I actually gave some thought to starting threads on both these topics.
I once commented that I felt that, if the show might have been in 2196 but was then "moved" to be officially placed in 2266, it would be good to move Khan 70 years later, too, to 2066. Also, moving McGivers 2018 comment forward to 2088. In that case, warp drive could still have been invented in 2063, and would have taken 25 years to become common, and Khan would have fled during that time period. It is really interesting to consider. Even early TNG could seem to fit with this, but then the years got more formalized, it seems not to be so now.
Please, no. Is stuff lining up so important that people are willing to overwrite the work people did 50+ years ago?
How long have you been on this board?
Eh. Just leave them all alone. Even DSC's are out of order and don't make sense. Until the 24th century any stardates outside the Kelvin Timeline movies that employed the actual year and a decimal point are just a general ballpark for when an episode or film takes place and kind of tricky to convert into Earth dates.
The bridge is so funny it opened for Carrot Top!
But was funnier!
BOOM!
No lies detected.
No lies detected.
I find the angle mildly amusing at best.
Similar threads
