Good point. There are a few on there with similar circumstances.By that logic, every character on your list could be a spoiler.
![]()
Good point. There are a few on there with similar circumstances.By that logic, every character on your list could be a spoiler.
![]()
"Fake" in what regard?This is FAKE!
That Senator Vreenak is not included."Fake" in what regard?
Complex character. Not a black and white "villain" to me. However, "other."That Senator Vreenak is not included.
I mean, if that's the case then Mark Lenard's character falls squarely out of villain status.Complex character. Not a black and white "villain" to me. However, "other."
He was an adversary and an antagonist, though reluctantly. He did kill all those people on those monitor stations and tries to kill our heroes out of duty. An anti-villain?The unnamed commander from BOT wasn't what I would call a villain. Seemed actually like a decent enough fellow stuck in an unfortunate situation. Now, Decius - he's a piece of work!
The best villains never are.Complex character. Not a black and white "villain" to me. However, "other."
He was definitely an adversary.I mean, if that's the case then Mark Lenard's character falls squarely out of villain status.
But, yes, other and also explaining what a fake was![]()
Agree. But, they are also clear adversaries (rather than potential allies).The best villains never are.
I mean so was Vreenak.He was definitely an adversary.
Some have names. Usually the underlings, Decius and Tal.Balance of Terror, Tomalak and Tokath, if he counts as a villain.
TOS, why didn't you give names to your Romulans? Other species got to have names!
Most of the rest of the list I didn't like. Oh, Narek and "dundunduuuun Sela" were/are dreadful characters.
Romulan commanders have no names. Romulan commanders need no names.Some have names. Usually the underlings, Decius and Tal.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.