That sounds like far too much of a nanny state for my tastes. The state determining whether or not you're happy enough? There's your dystopia.but they’d say it’s about making sure every single individual is following their passion
That sounds like far too much of a nanny state for my tastes. The state determining whether or not you're happy enough? There's your dystopia.but they’d say it’s about making sure every single individual is following their passion
Remember how in 'Amok Time' when Spock believed he had killed Kirk?But they're still characters who get along, who care about and fight for each other, who work together to make things better, in classic Star Trek fashion.
This guys videos just cherry picking and disingenuous shit to appeal to the YT incel crowd. You could inverse this video and use clips from TNG and Discovery.
Remember how in 'Amok Time' when Spock believed he had killed Kirk?
Spock: Doctor, I shall be resigning my commission immediately. There can be no excuse for the crime of which I'm guilty. I intend to offer no defence. Furthermore, I shall order Mister Scott to take immediate command of this vessel.
And yet, when Agnes murdered Bruce Maddox while he was in sickbay, everyone was all too happy to forget that awful deed since they didn't get the chance to make it to the staircase where she was going to turn herself in. I guess getting better means swiping bad deeds under the rug and being rewarded for it.
PICARD: That's what this is all about. A lot has changed in the past three hundred years. People are no longer obsessed with the accumulation of things. We've eliminated hunger, want, the need for possessions. We have grown out of our infancy.
PICARD: This is the twenty fourth century. Material needs no longer exist.
RALPH: Then what's the challenge?
PICARD: The challenge, Mister Offenhouse, is to improve yourself. To enrich yourself. Enjoy it.
Pure philosopher king Roddenberry. Never mind that Picard values his own possessions. He gets his hands on a rare surviving artifact from the long dead Ressikan civilization, and he keeps it for himself instead of donating it to Federation archaeologists or a museum.
He almost hoped that they were dead for good!To be fair, when "The Neutral Zone" was written, the characters and their inherent value systems were still being worked out/under the influence of Roddenberry. So later seasons and shows tend to contradict the first season of TNG. Just take Picard's attitude about the three 20th century survivors. He wants nothing to do with them and asks Riker to make sure they don't get in his way. There's no way the Picard from later seasons would act that way. He would be all about wanting to get to know them and the time they came from.
And in another episode Spock was under the influence of alien spores and assaulted Kirk and was going to kill him if the affect had not worn off. No repercussions for the assault. As @Phily B notes Geordi was under mind control to associate a Klingon governor. Being under alien influence has always been treated as a defense against the crimes committed. This is now new to Trek under Kurtzman.Remember how in 'Amok Time' when Spock believed he had killed Kirk?
Spock: Doctor, I shall be resigning my commission immediately. There can be no excuse for the crime of which I'm guilty. I intend to offer no defence. Furthermore, I shall order Mister Scott to take immediate command of this vessel.
And yet, when Agnes murdered Bruce Maddox while he was in sickbay, everyone was all too happy to forget that awful deed since they didn't get the chance to make it to the staircase where she was going to turn herself in. I guess getting better means swiping bad deeds under the rug and being rewarded for it.
Wait so you're saying, by this logic, if running the vineyard was his passion, but he absolutely sucked at it, the Federation would see themselves as justified to take it away from him? As if he were a child and didn't take care of his toy? Is trying and failing not allowed in your vision of the Federation?The Picards would’ve continued as stewards of their vineyard as a quaint bit of Earth history, because they clearly displayed passion and skill for it, so the authorities would’ve seen no reason to take it away from them.
Wait so you're saying, by this logic, if running the vineyard was his passion, but he absolutely sucked at it, the Federation would see themselves as justified to take it away from him? As if he were a child and didn't take care of his toy? Is trying and failing not allowed in your vision of the Federation?
Where did it ever say she was sentenced to do hard labour?Michael Burnham serving time in a penal colony doing hard labor.
IMHO though PIC really fucked up by showing those workers on his vineyard - along with Picard threatening to fire one for being racist against Romulans.
He gets his hands on a rare surviving artifact from the long dead Ressikan civilization, and he keeps it for himself instead of donating it to Federation archaeologists or a museum.
That sounds like far too much of a nanny state for my tastes. The state determining whether or not you're happy enough? There's your dystopia.
To be fair, when "The Neutral Zone" was written, the characters and their inherent value systems were still being worked out/under the influence of Roddenberry.
Is trying and failing not allowed in your vision of the Federation?
If that's what you do, then fine, good for you, I guess. But you previously asked "Don't we all" do this, and I was pointing out that no, I don't do it.Sure, if it interests me why Galactica 1980 was so poorly received, or what people see in The Expanse, I’ll watch them. There are shows and movies I’ll watch for all kinds of reasons regardless of quality. However, on top of that I like to seek out something I wouldn’t normally watch in order to get out of my comfort zone, and it’s usually a release with enough critical acclaim to further justify the detour.
I find this helps immeasurably in putting shows like Star Trek in their proper context, which is why it’s so curious when I see fans trying to hype up everything from a few Emmy nominations to an executive’s contract extension. Given the way these shows compare to some others it’s just not relevant: continued existence and business as usual, as opposed to making enough of an impact to carve out a sizable spot in the annals of television and film. As noted, how hard can it be on the most basic level to identify something that’s been overdone in the franchise and not do that again, like time travel? And if you’re highly familiar with the shows you’ll also be able to avoid the little things, like the aforementioned estrangement/reunion/reconciliation trope.
The opening scene of Context is for Kings, the other convicts in her shuttle are talking about an accident at labor facility that killed a bunch of workers and necessitated their transfer to it.Where did it ever say she was sentenced to do hard labour?
Yes, but that's just speculation.It’s been speculated in connection with the saucer crash that he might be donating the originals and replicating copies of such items.
Ah ok. I haven't watched episode 1 in two years, so yeah.the other convicts in her shuttle are talking about an accident at labor facility that killed a bunch of workers and necessitated their transfer to it.
I feel like you're confusing passion with ability. My daughter is SUPER passionate about painting. She (to date) is not very good at it and it is very possible no amount of art classes (Federation help) are going to change that. I encourage her to paint as much as she wants, because she enjoys it. Your interpretation of Roddenberry's vision would have the Federation come and (nicely) slap the paint out of her hands and tell her to go find something more suited to her talents. That is about as far away from Utopia as I can think of.I’m just interpreting Roddenberry’s vision. Failing is allowed, why not, but so is helping you with additional staff and suggesting what to do better next time. How can you maintain “paradise” if someone is bungling the job of managing a large historical site? Perhaps their passion simply lies elsewhere.
It’s been speculated
I’m just interpreting
And what influence was Captain Vandermeer under when he murdered two people and later committed suicide? We go from a Starfleet where the death penalty is forbidden with one exception (Visiting a planet) to "You will murder whoever we order you to without question or we will murder you and your whole crew." I mean, I had no idea it was that easy to get a Captain of a starship to commit atrocities. Kind of hard to convince anyone that alien mind-control is the way to go when all you need to do in order to get a seasoned Starship Captains to commit atrocities is a simple text message with a 'directive' in the title.And in another episode Spock was under the influence of alien spores and assaulted Kirk and was going to kill him if the affect had not worn off. No repercussions for the assault. As @Phily B notes Geordi was under mind control to associate a Klingon governor. Being under alien influence has always been treated as a defense against the crimes committed. This is now new to Trek under Kurtzman.
Are you Major Grin from YouTube? You post videos from that channel A LOT here.
I feel like you're confusing passion with ability. My daughter is SUPER passionate about painting. She (to date) is not very good at it and it is very possible no amount of art classes (Federation help) are going to change that. I encourage her to paint as much as she wants, because she enjoys it. Your interpretation of Roddenberry's vision would have the Federation come and (nicely) slap the paint out of her hands and tell her to go find something more suited to her talents. That is about as far away from Utopia as I can think of.
Speculating and interpreting is something we all do occasionally, but they don't really carry much weight in discussions with other people who don't necessarily speculate and interpret the same way.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.