Yeah. Everyone knows the NX-01 would be accepted if the writing was good.![]()
I didn’t say it would be accepted. I said that it wouldn’t ‘fuck up’ the show. ENT didn’t fail because of the design of the ship.
Yeah. Everyone knows the NX-01 would be accepted if the writing was good.![]()
Well, I'm pretty sure it "fucked up " the show, and would have even if it was good.I didn’t say it would be accepted. I said that it wouldn’t ‘fuck up’ the show. ENT didn’t fail because of the design of the ship.
Well, I'm pretty sure it "fucked up " the show, and would have even if it was good.
Not that. That even if the series was considered "good" the ship would be a "fuck up."I’m struggling to make sense of that statement. You seriously think the design of the NX-01 was the reason why ENT wasn’t a good show? I don’t like the design either, but I’m not that daft to think that was the reason why ENT failed.
But that's not what you said.Not that. That even if the series was considered "good" the ship would be a "fuck up."
Ah, I see what I did. I misspoke. Apologies.But that's not what you said.
A mix of both styles with more than just the Enterprise having round nacelles would have been great.
Nope. Just variety.I admit, I've always found Fuller's directive that DIS ships couldn't have round nacelles to be rather odd. Was there ever any specific context for that decision, or was it mainly just a personal opinion of his? I'm genuinely curious.
not really the only thing it proved is that the 1966 stuff is outdated and goofy and shouldn't be part of a modern production but obviously we're not going to agree with this lolENT's "In A Mirror, Darkly" proved that that particular design can hold its own in the modern age, both technically and visually.
not really the only thing it proved is that the 1966 stuff is outdated and goofy and shouldn't be part of a modern production but obviously we're not going to agree with this lol
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.