• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starship design history in light of Discovery

If they'd made it a spherical primary hull and more like a Daedalus-class starship the "not cool enough" kids would have been setting fires to protest the series betraying 2001 audiences with an archaic design. The NX-01 is fine. It's not precisely how I'd have designed it but it's more than adequate.
 
I’m struggling to make sense of that statement. You seriously think the design of the NX-01 was the reason why ENT wasn’t a good show? I don’t like the design either, but I’m not that daft to think that was the reason why ENT failed.
Not that. That even if the series was considered "good" the ship would be a "fuck up."
 
I think it was just his personal tastes just to shake things up for the sake of shaking things up.
 
I admit, I've always found Fuller's directive that DIS ships couldn't have round nacelles to be rather odd. Was there ever any specific context for that decision, or was it mainly just a personal opinion of his? I'm genuinely curious.
Nope. Just variety.

It works.
 
John Eaves tried to head-canon it as being necessary for whatever this new drive was.
He wasn't given full plot details when designing the ships, all he knew was there was a new experimental drive of some sort, so he had to come up with his own reasons why things looked the way they did.
 
ENT's "In A Mirror, Darkly" proved that that particular design can hold its own in the modern age, both technically and visually.
not really the only thing it proved is that the 1966 stuff is outdated and goofy and shouldn't be part of a modern production but obviously we're not going to agree with this lol
 
Last edited:
LOL Yeah I caught that one too.
TrAMzgR.jpg
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top