• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Rand leaving the Enterprise

But I can understand why some average Joe on the street might leave the film with an unfavorable view of Harriman.

I'm not disputing that, so there's no need to relitigate it. I just regret that so many people look at it so shallowly or never reconsider their first impressions. The first impression is where you're supposed to start thinking, not stop thinking.
 
I'm not disputing that, so there's no need to relitigate it. I just regret that so many people look at it so shallowly or never reconsider their first impressions. The first impression is where you're supposed to start thinking, not stop thinking.

It's one of many reasons I enjoy reading the novels. Sometimes they make us look at a character in a different light. Just the novelization for Generations went a long way for that. He didn't want to take the ship out yet but was basically forced to. And of course novels can get into characters heads and explain their thought processes much better. So that helps too.

I remember Mere Anarchy did something similar with Admiral Morrow. We were left with an impression of a desk bound paper pusher in TSFS that cared more about regulations and politics than he did about people. I'll never forget the conversation in one of the stories Morrow had with Spock where he apologized for not being more supportive of Kirk and regretting his actions.

As for the average Joe out there, if Harriman had been a major character in the movie perhaps opinion of him may have changed over time. But I imagine since his role in the overall movie was pretty minor many people probably just didn't bother thinking too much about him after that sequence ended.
 
I don't know much about Fix so I honestly couldn't say how he would have been long term. Kelley was great as McCoy so I would never change a thing about that. And I have seen Hoyt in a lot of shows and some movies and he probably would have been fine.

I just thought it'd be interesting to someday see a novel that gives Piper a meaningful role. Just because the actor might have been meh does not mean the character would have to be.



And that's actually a case where the novelization of the movie helped. It presented him in a more favorable light, and of course the Lost Era novels go a long way to presenting him as more than capable. It's just the first impression from the film leaves you with a less than favorable view of Harriman. The casual movie going audience probably thought of Harriman as a buffoon, fair or not. And I think the filmmakers were probably trying to make Kirk look good at the expense of Harriman. On repeated viewing, and reading the novelizations, and the other novels Harriman was featured in, I have a much more favorable view of Harriman now. But I have to admit, after I saw Generations for the first time my first thought was "how did that guy become captain of the Enterprise?"
Harriman is less of an imbecile than chief engineer Logan in the Kelvin timeline whose only purpose was to create an opening for a new chief engineer.

Oh and bringing it back to Rand, I wonder if one reason she has been largely ignored as a main character in her own right is because she is usually there to showcase the other characters, in the same was as Harriman, getting slapped down by Kirk or Spock. It's rarely about her. Her scenes with Sulu and Green in Man Trap and a couple of her interactions with Charlie are just about the only times she really commands the screen. Although I thought her final scenes with Charlie in her quarters seemed a bit of an abrupt personality change, it shows Grace could play Rand with an underlying layer of steel if she was pushed far enough. I would have loved to see bad ass Rand in Dagger of the Mind or City on the Edge of Forever.
 
Last edited:
And really, it's not as if Rand ever officially departed; she just stopped showing up, as did Farrell, Riley, DeSalle, and various others. A lot of those characters showed up in novels set later, on the assumption that they were still aboard even if we didn't see them. Doing the same with Rand is a bit more of a stretch, but maybe one could surmise she just transferred to the night shift or something -- or that she was still in the endless rotation of yeomen, but only happened to have a bridge shift in between the episodes we saw.
Rand has a line in the VOY episode "Flashback" about it taking her three years to make ensign. So a simple explanation could be that she transferred off the Enterprise to another ship when she finally got her commission.
(Although I find it odd that the Marvel (Vol. 1) and DC Comics series mostly advanced with the movie timeline while the majority of prose novels stayed back in the TV era.)
Why is that odd? The movie era was the "present day" of Star Trek when those comics were being produced in the 1980s. (Although the second DC series did shift to the TV era towards the end of it's run.)
I think John Byrne didn't really like the hair so he was happy to formally write her out but he later regretted that so he bought her back as part of the ensemble with a new hairdo.
:wtf: Huh? Why would Rand's hairstyle have anything to do with it? Byrne was illustrating New Visions with photos, so he never had to draw her hairdo. Giving her a new hairstyle (or placing Grace Lee Whitney's head onto another actress' body, as it looks like Byrne did most of the time) was a lot more work, I'm sure.
But she was brought back for John Byrne's "New Visions" photo comic series. Byrne happens to like Rand.
Part of that was also that Rand is a favorite of Byrne's editor on New Visions, Chris Ryall. Byrne used photos of Ryall to "play" Rand's fiancé Andrew Calloway in issue #2's "Sweet Sorrow" and issue #15's "Should Old Acquaintance Be Forgot..."
That's why it was so bizarre that McIntyre asserted this about Rand -- because Grace Lee Whitney was around the same age as Shatner and did not even remotely look under twenty, not to mention that "Charlie X" was predicated on Rand being way too old for the 17-year-old Charlie. It just made no sense for that character.
Yeah, agreed. I wonder if McIntyre was forgetting about "Charlie X" or consciously contradicting it.
We'd gotten a different version of that story in DC Comics' first TOS annual the previous year, written by Mike W. Barr. I always preferred Mike's version, which was truer to the pilot era and featured Mitchell and Kelso significantly (although it also contrived to feature McCoy instead of Piper, which was fine because Piper was dull).
That's the version of Kirk's first mission on the Enterprise that's in my head canon. :)
I saw him as a captain who was perfectly competent but was stuck with an inadequate ship through no fault of his own. He came up with a number of promising suggestions that just couldn't be done because of the ship's limitations, and when he ran out of ideas, he did the smartest, most admirable thing possible under the circumstances: setting aside his ego and calling on the experience of a more seasoned veteran. I don't understand why people hold that against him. How many times did Kirk defer to Spock to come up with a solution he couldn't think of? Nobody holds that against Kirk. It's not a captain's job to have all the answers, it's a captain's job to work with a team and bring the answers out of them.
Yeah, but as you note in one of your subsequent comments, the directing and the acting of that sequence both go out of their way to present Harriman as totally out of his depth. Alan Ruck is in full "nervous guy" mode for most of his screentime.
 
Rand left the Enterprise in issue 12 of the original Marvel comics series ("Eclipse of Reason").
 
Rand left the Enterprise in issue 12 of the original Marvel comics series ("Eclipse of Reason").

But that was the second time. Post-TMP, and Transporter Chief Rand was marrying a non-corporeal alien (was to have been a Medusan, but not allowed by the contract Marvel signed for TMP tie-ins) and leaving the galaxy on a no-return mission. Except she did come back. ;)
 
But that was the second time. Post-TMP, and Transporter Chief Rand was marrying a non-corporeal alien (was to have been a Medusan, but not allowed by the contract Marvel signed for TMP tie-ins) and leaving the galaxy on a no-return mission. Except she did come back. ;)
Yes! I remember that one. I think her only other appearance in the run after TMP was being stunned at the transporter controls. She was cited as a lieutenant-commander and re-joined the crew at the end of the issue after ditching her mentally ill husband. Classic 60s - 80s reset button. I didn't know it was to have been a Medusan - that would have been much cooler.

I used to like it when the supporting crew were included in landing parties. I think everyone, including Chapel and DiFalco got landing party duty at one point or another. This was Rand's only major appearance in the issues I own.

Rand is actually a complicated character (although I don't know if that was intentional or just from inconsistent writing). She seems to be very deferential and efficient on duty when dealing with senior officers but much more collaborative and convivial with the junior officers, with jokes and quips and suggestions. She's also willing to tease Spock while off duty (and his inappropriate comment in Enemy Within is a bit less creepy if you accept that they were friends off duty). The overall picture is actually quite a realistic workplace dynamic.

I think most of Rand's appearances have been quite flat in terms of her personality - yes sir no sir interactions - or as a cypher to deliver plot points. It's true that one of the Yeomen's purposes apart from being eye candy to lure in a male audience (which doesn't help in literature), was to ask questions for Kirk, Spock, or McCoy to explain to the audience at home, so asking dumb questions was baked into her personality, but her major appearances have not really channelled her sparkle or her humour IMO. If Rand had been replaced with any other character (and Kirk seemed to have an endless sea of exes) the story would not have looked off.

After their scenes in the Man Trap, I think her post TOS scenes with Sulu tend to be the most accurate, and the way she teases Tuvok seems reminiscent of her relationship with Spock.

If there was an official or even unofficial edict not to use Rand outside season one era stories, or possibly due to contractual issues prior to her return to the franchise, this would explain the character's absence from other stories over the years. It's quite hard for me to fathom otherwise. Just think how often TOS stories could have passed the Bechdel Test if Rand had been kept around.
 
Well, it could also be a result of the fallout of her contract. Grace had a 13-week contract, while some of the others were "day players". Grace took a chunk of the budget each week and the writers were not utilising her character as much as they should have been. There was a conscious move towards having variety in yeomen after her departure. This is reflected in the books. Grace's likeness is used in the early Gold Key comics, and then she disappears. Just like in the show. Especially in the early days, the novelists weren't inventing reasons for characters' unexplained onscreen departures.
I thought she left because of the thing that happened to her that I don't really feel comfortable getting into in this thread.
I'm not even just talking about the asking Kirk for advice, though the way it was presented on screen made it seem like Harriman was just out of his depth and turning to someone for help because he couldn't hack it. It wasn't that he asked for help. It was just that the way the scene played out it made it seem like he wasn't ready and he needed Kirk to swoop in and rescue him. But it wasn't just that. The film made it seem like Harriman took the ship out before it was ready. There was just a lot of the way that whole prologue was presented that could leave you with the impression that Harriman wasn't ready for command, certainly not of the flagship of the Federation. Now on deeper reflection and after reading other novels featuring him, he has been presented as a much more favorable character. But I can understand why some average Joe on the street might leave the film with an unfavorable view of Harriman.
I never really blamed Harriman for what happened in the Generations prologue. Even without having read the novelization, I always got the feeling that he was a good captain, but he just ended up in a bad situation that the ship hadn't been prepared for. It was just supposed to be a quick trip around the neighborhood, they weren't supposed to end in a life or death situation.
 
I thought she left because of the thing that happened to her that I don't really feel comfortable getting into in this thread.

It was complicated. Yes, there was an incident (not discussed for decades). Yes, she was expensive and not being used efficiently. And yes, she was also addicted to diet pills and alcohol.
 
It was complicated. Yes, there was an incident (not discussed for decades). Yes, she was expensive and not being used efficiently. And yes, she was also addicted to diet pills and alcohol.
She was only slightly more expensive than Takei and they could have moved her to a day player or guest star status, like Majel in season one. I think it was the assault that led to her being dropped completely but her noticeable health issues must have made it easier.

If you look at the early scenes in Miri, you can see her face is puffy and she's wearing a girdle. I expect the producers were nervous about using someone whose appearance might fluctuate across an episode.
 
...I'm guessing probably not much more than it already did.
Lol, well I was thinking more in subsequent modern comics and literature rather than the show. I'm struggling to remember any episodes of TOS that might pass... Maybe Chapel educating Uhura?
 
She was only slightly more expensive than Takei and they could have moved her to a day player or guest star status, like Majel in season one.

Demoting an actor from her 13-episode contract to a day player?

It was a chance to rethink the cast mix. A rotating female in the yeoman role meant that the writers could use the character as scripts required, not conjuring up scenes just to use Rand. Majel kept coming back because she was Roddenberry's mistress. ;)

TNG's writers made the same complaint about Troi in Season One. Marina wasn't needed for some scripts and got to stay at home that week. They were seriously considering dropping the character altogether. The show losing both Yar and Crusher essentially saved Troi.
 
It was a chance to rethink the cast mix. A rotating female in the yeoman role meant that the writers could use the character as scripts required, not conjuring up scenes just to use Rand.

I'm not sure I buy that. A yeoman is a captain's personal assistant and clerk, and in theory was supposed to be the person who keeps the captain's log and records events on landing parties. If they'd depicted a yeoman's duties authentically, it shouldn't have been hard to justify having her around Kirk regularly. I mean, it's much the same as Radar's (and later Klinger's) company clerk job on M*A*S*H, and they had no trouble giving him stuff to do. And Rand was intended to be just as much a lead character as McCoy was; they were billed more or less equally in the end titles. If anything, it makes more sense for a captain's yeoman to be in frequent proximity to the captain than it does for the ship's CMO.

The problem is that they thought of Rand as a love interest first and a professional second. I wonder if they would've "rethought" in the same way if the yeoman had been male.
 
I'm not sure I buy that. A yeoman is a captain's personal assistant and clerk, and in theory was supposed to be the person who keeps the captain's log and records events on landing parties. If they'd depicted a yeoman's duties authentically, it shouldn't have been hard to justify having her around Kirk regularly....
The problem is that they thought of Rand as a love interest first and a professional second.

I agree. They painted themselves into a corner. Especially after "Miri", I think.
 
I agree. They painted themselves into a corner. Especially after "Miri", I think.

Ahh, I doubt that had anything to do with it. Continuity could easily be ignored back then. Characters could seem to be on the verge of a major advance in their romance in one episode and then be back to square one in the next.

You misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm not agreeing with the writers' excuses for dropping the character. I'm saying the problem was the same kind of sexism that you alluded to with the TNG situation, where only the female characters were in danger of being dropped because too little was being done with them. The reason too little was being done with them wasn't the characters' fault, it was the writers' fault for considering women to be secondary in importance.
 
Ahh, I doubt that had anything to do with it. Continuity could easily be ignored back then. Characters could seem to be on the verge of a major advance in their romance in one episode and then be back to square one in the next.

You misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm not agreeing with the writers' excuses for dropping the character. I'm saying the problem was the same kind of sexism that you alluded to with the TNG situation, where only the female characters were in danger of being dropped because too little was being done with them. The reason too little was being done with them wasn't the characters' fault, it was the writers' fault for considering women to be secondary in importance.
Very much so, although it's possible that, in Gates' case, sexual politics behind the scenes played a part in her replacement too. Fans petitioned for her return. Rand exited before any episodes aired and was also quite popular with fans. I suppose the difference was that the doctor character has a very important, pivotal niche that a secretary just doesn't have. If Dagger of the Mind had featured her in more of an action heroine role, I wonder if that could have gone some way to redeem the character and cement her as one of the Big 4.
 
I'm struggling to remember any episodes of TOS that might pass... Maybe Chapel educating Uhura?
That would be probably be about it, yeah. I'm honestly struggling to remember any scenes in TOS that meet even the first criterion of the Bechdel Test (two women talking to each other).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top