Yeah, it is still terrible. I've thought about it, watched it, and then gone back and watched Terra Prime. One stands out in a positive way; one stands out because it is focused on completely different characters than the main ones.
What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?
- Thread starter Amasov
- Start date
He'd have to thank the Q.
How about the little girl. I bet if Riker had given her her life back she would have begged Riker to leave her dead.
Yeah. To my mind he brought her back when he gave every one presents and just didn't mention it.
I was much more taken aback by Picards callus "Why did you rescue them?" attitude.
It was??? The upteenth "future character destroys their timeline for our heroes" plot? Ugh.
"TATV...(ENT)" is a lot sloppier and worse. "Endgame" is no TNG or DS9 finale but at least it's watchable.
It was at least about the characters from the title show.
That's not really true. Q is not the one who gave him his sight back but even if it was, big deal!!!
Yeah, I'd rather be disabled for the rest of my life than say thanks to someone I don't like!!!
How much of an idiot does someone have to be.
I mean if I was disabled or I had cancer or something and all I would have to do to be cured is to kiss the boots of the person I most dislike in the world, I would do it without hesitation and/or shame.
Plus as I said the only person that he really could have rightfully thanked is Riker...
The thing is that nobody is that stupid. No one would look such a beautiful gift horse in the mouth only in the brain of a writer... A BAD writer!!!
Bad writer. Bad.
Bad, bad, bad, bad, bad! Do not use!
Bad, bad, bad, bad, bad! Do not use!
What other episodes did they write?
Don't know. I just am easily amused when people say "Bad Writers."
How about "terrible writers"?
Not as funny.
Mixed bag.
Small victory.
Not an idiot, just some one with obviously different priorities than yours.
With those episodes it's a matter of inches.
When faux Reed asks Archer if he would ask the Klingons if they had a cure for the disease, he made one of the uncharacteristically most sensible responses he ever gave for this kind of question: "On bended knee."
Only an imbecile of the highest degree would pass on a cure for such a disability for such an idiotic reason.
However, it wouldn't be a controversial opinion if everyone agreed with me, would it?
Similar threads
- Locked
