One too many.I wonder how many lives were lost while Riker was trying to out-clever the BoP rather than simply launching 15 torpedoes at it.
One too many.I wonder how many lives were lost while Riker was trying to out-clever the BoP rather than simply launching 15 torpedoes at it.
Yep. Even if you assume that some of the launchers get damaged during the battle, and you assume Riker was position the ship to minimize damage to critical areas like the bridge and engineering, Riker could and should have fired all available weapons pretty early on. Even with the BoP shields up, I'm guessing that the E-D could have done a decent amount of damage just from a few phaser and photon hits.I wonder how many lives were lost while Riker was trying to out-clever the BoP rather than simply launching 15 torpedoes at it.
This is more my frustration. They don't do any of the solutions that have worked in the past against far superior foes.The main issue with the shield frequency was that it was such a point of emphasis in the past that specifically helped to prevent the E-D from being seriously damaged or destroyed against the Borg. I can trust or at least go along with most things, but the exact reason the E-D was destroyed in this film was due to not doing something (i.e., rotating shield frequency or modulating or whatever) that helped prevent it from being destroyed in the past. It was seriously one of the first things I thought of after first viewing Generations.
As for First Contact all the interior shots were done on redressed Star Trek Voyager sets and DS9 Defiant sets, same with insurrection...
Nemesis had a recycled romulan capital city shot.
correct, I think they reconciled the observation lounge table from TNG, though.The Enterprise-E bridge, ready room, observation lounge, and main engineering set were built new for First Contact.
he says that casualties were “light”, not necessarily zero.
Oof, having a mandala affect here. I swear in the version I watched he said no lives were lost.
this is why I wrote “not NECESSARILY zero:” we just don’t know. Could be three crewmen dead or just Worf with a broken nail.Casualties does not equal fatalities. Casualty just means someone was injured enough to take them off duty, this includes both deaths and recoverable injuries.
No, but I was completely misremembering that line so the correction was helpful.Casualties does not equal fatalities. Casualty just means someone was injured enough to take them off duty, this includes both deaths and recoverable injuries.
correct, I think they reconciled the observation lounge table from TNG, though.
Then again, many other sets were recycled from the series...But that’s really been extremely common in te history of Star Trek, nothing that unusual and certainly nothing as conspicuous as the Ent-D engineering standing in for the A’s in ST6.
well, it’s really the ent-d set, even the LCARS are 24th century. Luckily it’s only a very brief shot.Hrmm, well, maybe that is what the "Excelsior" upgrades are all about, and it was standard by the time of TUC?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.