But why would people think the Discovery came there from time travel? As we have seen, there are many Disco ships around still.
Poll USS Discovery after retrofit
- Thread starter ITDUDE
- Start date
They didn’t need the -A to do that.
This means the Voyager-J may well be the exact same ship Janeway commanded, 10 generations of refits later.
No wonder she's still listed as Intrepid class!
No wonder she's still listed as Intrepid class!
So those anti Borg tech form an alternate future save her.This means the Voyager-J may well be the exact same ship Janeway commanded, 10 generations of refits later.
No wonder she's still listed as Intrepid class!
But then wouldn’t they have named it the Discovery-M or something, if they really wanted to fool people into thinking it was a more contemporary ship?
Why stick an something as obvious as A. Could change the name to something completely different like Rocinante or something.
Obviously IRL they are not going to change the name of the ship/show
They would then have to explain why there is no Discovery B-L on record
Maybe my point wasn’t clear. Why would they need to ‘disguise’ the Discovery as a new ship at all? Who cares if it’s the null, the ‘A,’ or the ‘M’?
When it spins round to jump do the nacelles stay static or move delayed as if on a string?
One of the alternate futures Gabrielle has seen.I wasn't expecting the A designation on the same "retrofitted" ship.
Calypso now has a continuity error right?
Maybe they'll un-refit it at the end of the season
Explaining the differences between the Discovery/Strange New Worlds and TOS Enterprises in the process
Explaining the differences between the Discovery/Strange New Worlds and TOS Enterprises in the process
In regards to Discovery now being NCC-1031-A. I don't think it has anything to do with keeping the ship's past a secret or to hide the fact she came from the past.
Starfleet always has had a certain level of arbitrariness with hull registries--the decision not to give the NCC-1701-A designation to the totally redesigned Enterprise in TMP, the decision to keep the NX-72405 registry for two consecutive USS Defiants, and for some supposedly newer ships to have lower registry numbers than older ships. That arbitrariness may not have changed in the 32rd-Century. This Starfleet may simply have amended Discovery's hull registry after her upgrade because they felt like doing so. The Starfleet of 900+ years ago may not have done so.
Starfleet always has had a certain level of arbitrariness with hull registries--the decision not to give the NCC-1701-A designation to the totally redesigned Enterprise in TMP, the decision to keep the NX-72405 registry for two consecutive USS Defiants, and for some supposedly newer ships to have lower registry numbers than older ships. That arbitrariness may not have changed in the 32rd-Century. This Starfleet may simply have amended Discovery's hull registry after her upgrade because they felt like doing so. The Starfleet of 900+ years ago may not have done so.
Letters are attached when they reuse the registry number.
I think it was always marketed as a possible future for Discovery, not the de facto one.
The upgrades are cool. The A at the end of the registry number? Fucking stupid.
Correct it's not really the Enterprise-A but the 1701-A
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
