Good point!Technically speaking, Starfleet records list it as being destroyed in the 23rd century.
Maybe they’re trying to cover it up from being from the past![]()
Good point!Technically speaking, Starfleet records list it as being destroyed in the 23rd century.
Maybe they’re trying to cover it up from being from the past![]()
Guy said he was a cousin of Osiris so I’m guessing OrionSo...who is Osyrra? Big Bad slaver of unknown origin. Speculate away...
I'm still trying to figure out what arbitrary reason the writers decided to throw Orions and Andorians together. All I can come up with is they have similar skin colors. Like, hey, Twi'leks are green and blue.
Thing is, if someone did something similar in human terms it would be, you know, bad.
So Disco becomes NCC-1031-A, and it was NCC-1031 in Calypso. This rule out the possibility that Discovery will go backwards 930 years again later in the story?
But we witnessed Disco changed its code to conceal its real identity in season 1...
I don’t get how having detached nacelles will improve Manoeuvrability.
I missed the 1031-A first time round. That’s not how a retrofit works. It’s still the same ship. This isn’t the first time they made that mistake.
If that was the case they would have given it a completely different name and reg number.Starfleet had listed Discovery as being destroyed, maybe the "A" was added to conceal that fact since time travelling ships aren't exactly kosher in that century
If that was the case they would have given it a completely different name and reg number.
Maybe with these new DiscoVerse rules that the Voyager J is the same Voyager we saw in the show.
Yeah. With this new system you would run out of letters very fast.That would explain the confusion with the Tikhov and it's M designation, despite dialogue implying it was the same ship from the 23rd century. Maybe it got a new letter for every refit (which is a bit silly, but nevermind).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.