I don't remember where, but I thought I read somewhere when all of the drama over Depp and Heard first started, that it was more of mutual two sided thing, not just Depp. Which doesn't justify his behavior, but it does mean that she's not totally innocent in this whole thing.
Yeah, those bitches are always asking for it, right? Jesus.
The problem I have with the character's portrayal is that he is made to look evil and over the top, a lot of that comes from Depp. But I see Grindlewald as someone much tamer. It's hard to imagine that Dumbledore fell in love with Depp's version of Grindlewald.Good riddance. Even without the by no means minor detail that he's a domestic abuser, his shtick got old even before the Pirates movies fizzled out.
Not that I think the casting would have made Grindlewald any less of a tedious, forgettable slog of a movie, but Colin Farrell's performance in the first one was far and away more engaging, and I'd always thought they'd have been better served just sticking with him from the get-go.
Agreed. I could see it with the Farrell version but definitely not the Depp version.The problem I have with the character's portrayal is that he is made to look evil and over the top, a lot of that comes from Depp. But I see Grindlewald as someone much tamer. It's hard to imagine that Dumbledore fell in love with Depp's version of Grindlewald.
Check out how much Jack Nicholson earned from all the Batman movies he wasn't in.Oh, I didn't realize that was standard.
Should've been him in the first place (if Farrell "had" to be replaced).Mads Mikkelsen in talks to take over as Gellert Grindelwald.
Mads Mikkelsen in talks to take over as Gellert Grindelwald.
Again, my opinion is that said universe is fundamentally silly. Not that silly is inherently bad - the first three Wallace and Gromit shorts and the feature film, for instance, are silly and great - but a silly fictional universe is not a great fit for dark and brooding WW2 allegories, IMO. In a flick about kids on an adventure at a magic boarding school, waving small sticks around works because it reflects the whimsy of childhood, and puts youngsters and adults on a more or less equal footing. When it's a story about just adults... not so much. (When making the Gandalf/Saruman fight in Fellowship of the Ring, Peter Jackson wisely avoided making their staffs shoot out any kind of CG luminescence.)
Given that Yates' Wizarding World movies all looks drab and dreary as heck, moreover, I have no confidence whatsoever that the move to Rio will bring any of the color or vitality that's been missing since Goblet of Fire back to the franchise.
Exactly - elements. It also used to have light and fanciful elements, however, such as House point competitions, Quidditch games, adolescent romance, and using dragons in inter-school sporting competitions. But, starting in Year 5, Rowling's previously canny balancing act toppled over onto the dark and brooding side, and the franchise has gone creatively downhill ever since.
The premise of FB1 seemed to acknowledge the franchise's enduring need for light and fanciful elements, but by all accounts, FB2 forgot that entirely.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.