Even Worf himself isn't as "Honorable" as you'd think a person so devoted to it should be... when it comes to his parenting. His kid's mother is half human, & was raising him to value that part of himself, (Maybe even favor it) & she probably took to Worf in the 1st place specifically because he was raised on Earth, among humans, & chooses to work & associate himself with them routinely, & value their ways to some degree. There may have been no one better suited, in the entire galaxy, for her to have a family with, when you boil it down. After all, if Worf is so hellbent on Klingon ways why the hell doesn't he just go there & get with it wholly? It's because there IS another part to Worf, the part that wants Starfleet & their ideals. We just never get browbeat with that aspect a tenth as much.
So then she dies & how does he handle it? He goes out of his way to literally shun & eradicate any involvement he could have in continuing to keep that spirit alive for his son. He by all accounts, literally dishonors his son & son's mother by disregarding or disavowing her wishes, as if the kid would suffer greatly by not being a proper Klingon, when he himself is living proof that it need not be that way. For god sake, he did his kid more wrong than Sarek. He's a walking contradiction, & not a very interesting one
The TNG Guide describes Worf as being proud of his Klingon heritage, but also intelligent and open-minded enough to accept multiple points of view, but in the show he was mostly stubborn, blinkered, and repetitive. The K'Ehleyr and Alexander saga is one of the worst examples, not least since K'Ehleyr was a great character who deserved better; Birthright, as another thread argues, is also poor for him.
I think the idea was that a lot of Worf's pride was tied into him proving that he's a Real, True, Full-blooded Klingon, not diluted or compromised in any way by his adoption into a human family, and human society. Not a bad concept, in theory - personal conflict and growth to potentially be had - but in practice it was usually executed with all the subtlety of a painstik upside the head and flattened him out as a character.
And, as we keep coming back to, that the culture he so championed was so ill-defined and one-dimensional as to not warrant or justify such devotion, didn't help in the slightest.
The walking contradiction thing sometimes irks me about Riker too. As written, he's supposed to be the every man, congenial best friend of the crew type guy, but because the actor was so much better at playing something quite different, he ends up more often being difficult, brooding, hardheaded, even egotistical & somewhat elitist at times. Now admittedly, THAT Riker is way more interesting of a character, but they really struggled to reconcile those conflicting representations.
Whenever I hear Data talk about Riker's easy going nature in Data's Day, I think "When?" when the hell is that guy easy going? It seemed, especially after season 2, way more like he was only easy going when he'd spent years getting to know someone closely. Otherwise, he could routinely be a big fat dick lol
At first, I struggled to see why you'd describe Riker that way, but then I remembered how he reacted to Tam Elbrun, and Ro Laren, and his own father, and especially Captain Jellico. I don't agree he was more often brooding and difficult, but he did behave that way on multiple occasions, and it could feel kinda forced. Seems only fair to mention that it could work, too; his mood at the end of The Vengeance Factor was fully in keeping with events, and how could he have been anything else in Frame of Mind?
Not arguing the contradiction in this, of course, and it did blemish a generally, for me at least, entertaining and engaging character.