Nothing that you will accept, because you’ve made up your mind you’re right. You don’t even accept the words of the creators and IP holder.
So how important is canon, then?
- Thread starter Trekkie27
- Start date
Nothing that you will accept, because you’ve made up your mind you’re right. You don’t even accept the words of the creators and IP holder.
The Tantalus device? That can't be right. That wouldn't send him to another time. It would just leave him devoid of a mind. He must've had it mixed up.
You’re mixing up “Dagger of the Mind” and “Mirror, Mirror”.
Yes, quite limited when it comes to Vulcans. No, I don't trust the EMH's statement.
Yeah, I don't think that is the implication at all.
Procreation, maintaining their species, becoming close to their partner, in the case of a non-Vulcan partner satisfying their partner's needs. Recognizing it is a biological function and thus requires no other justification than that.
Oh, to be young again.
you still haven't shown me where any words like sex or mating or anything else referring to sexuality do appear on your side.
the concept was that they're sent to the prime universe's past and found by the NX-01, IIRC
So you think Amanda Grayson only had sex with Sarek once every seven years?
That appears to be the argument, yes.
"I know, I know. It isn't logical."
Sarek was probably rocking that every night and twice on Sunday.
PICARD: Perrin. Amanda. I wanted to give you so much more. I wanted to show you such tenderness. But that is not our way. Spock, Amanda, did you know? Perrin, can you know how much I love you? I do love you!
"It's only logical."Sarek was probably rocking that every night and twice on Sunday.
Sorry, no mention of mating or sex so it doesn't count by the rules of this thread.
That doesn’t say anything about sex.
I nominate that we rename this thread "So how important is sex, then?"
"It's only logical."
Sorry, no mention of mating or sex so it doesn't count by the rules of this thread.
proper counterarguments =/= rules of any thread
Who decides what is a “proper counter argument”?
Never in 21 years here did I ever think I'd make a post like this but here it goes...
... blood flow causes the reproductive organs to swell. Swell to the point of physical discomfort. So the organs have to be satiated in order to restore normal blood flow. Normal blood flow is logical.
Why do I feel like Fonzie jumping over a shark?
Last edited:
which supports your side and contradicts mine... how?
Similar threads
