She's just a crewman in the film. The are multiple images without the effects here.The female officer was unnamed in the movie, but the novelization describes her as flag officer Lori Ciana, and goes into more detail about a relationship she had with Kirk, and exactly how Kirk felt upon seeing her again.
The movie scene might have been more powerful if both she and Sonak had gotten more character development before the accident happened.
Kor
True, but even with the character just being crewman, I think it's unfortunate that her only purpose in the film's narrative was to die gruesomely.She's just a crewman in the film. The are multiple images without the effects here.
But the point of the scene isn't them as characters, it's that the ship is untested and unready and there are potentially dire consequences to going out so quickly, and bookended by the wormhole while nearly destroys the ship.True, but even with the character just being crewman, I think it's unfortunate that her only purpose in the film's narrative was to die gruesomely.
Kor
It's such an unnecessary scene. And then McCoy's worry about the transporter is treated with a chuckle. It's so strange.True, but even with the character just being crewman, I think it's unfortunate that her only purpose in the film's narrative was to die gruesomely.
Kor
We'd had the Enemy Within and the Children Shall Lead (which made little sense because surely if the targeting scanners detect an unsafe location, automatic safety protocols would prevent transport unless you override)
but this was the first time we'd had a full on transporter catastrophe.
I do agree that the subsequent McCoy scene is too flippant and I wish the characters looked rueful rather than amused but McCoy always raises a smile for us, let alone his friends.
I think the issue with AtCSL was that the children had moved the ship rather than the operator was being controlled to override the safety or I'd agree completely. Of course they might have had the foresight to control the operator off camera....And then the operator would override. This is consistent with how the kids made the adults do idiotic things: Sulu didn't believe his instruments, either.
And no doubt the planning sessions for that movie involved quite a few "Now how could we shock the teens with stuff that would never have been allowed in 1960s TV?" brainstorming, this being one of the more obvious ways in which Star Trek could make you scream.
...Just have it happen in reverse: McCoy gets aboard fine, complaining; the other heroes dismiss his phobia; and then, perhaps immediately thereafter, we finally see that it's Bones who has his head screwed on right.
Timo Saloniemi
Was the ship ever fully crewed or ready in those 6 movies?But the point of the scene isn't them as characters, it's that the ship is untested and unready and there are potentially dire consequences to going out so quickly, and bookended by the wormhole while nearly destroys the ship.
Whether those two scenes are effective narratively is another matter.
It's interesting that the problem with the transporter was not thought to be a safety issue to the point where they could work on it while still in use. The faulty sensor was just causing the system to be slow or something. The system shorting out isn't really well explained, especially since they transport is linked to the sending platform. Possibly a power surge disrupted the confinement beam?One might argue that the mission in ST6:TUC wasn't quite as totally impromptu as all the others... Although whether the mission of diplomatic escort called for a greater percentage of waiters and a lower percentage of gunners than standard, or perhaps vice versa, we don't know exactly.
(What's fun is that the top officers never seem to be what Starfleet proscribed: TMP is a Kirk-stirred mess, ST2/3 is a birthday cruise, ST4/5 is a publicity stunt for celebrities, and ST6 has a diplomat passenger take over for half the movie.)
Was it intentional that the accident appears to be Kirk's personal fault entirely? That is, Kirk drags Decker away from supervising important work that involves a component whose failure ultimately causes the transporter accident. Had Decker not been distracted by Kirk's takeover campaign speech, he probably would have competently managed those bits of the repair job that were not obvious to the repairmen themselves - such as informing the rest of the ship of the indirect consequences, including "Do NOT try the transporter at this time!".
Timo Saloniemi
According to Robert Wise's commentary track on the Director's Edition DVD, she was the navigator, with her death opening the door for Ilia to join the crew as her last-minute replacement, just as Sonak's freed up Spock's spot as science officer.She's just a crewman in the film. The are multiple images without the effects here.
I know many would like horror but that is one genre I don't think belongs as part of Star Trek. So, hard pass on a close up of a horrific transporter accident.It could've lingered on the figures being distorted for a second or two longer, and been a touch more horrific really... The Director's Cut boosted it from G to PG in a few places, but only because of the sound mix accentuating the creepiness of some scenes here and there.
Especially when it comes so soon after this incident!It's such an unnecessary scene. And then McCoy's worry about the transporter is treated with a chuckle. It's so strange.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.