Having a set time period for Section 31 isn't important, because by all accounts the Wind Cleaver is a timeship. It will likely stay in the future between missions.
Yeah, just like how the Blue Harvest was a timeship in Star Wars.

Having a set time period for Section 31 isn't important, because by all accounts the Wind Cleaver is a timeship. It will likely stay in the future between missions.
I’m not getting the connection. The Wind Cleaver is the name of a ship in Discovery S3 and Section 31.Yeah, just like how the Blue Harvest was a timeship in Star Wars.![]()
I can explain it again?^
Huh?
I’m not getting the connection. The Wind Cleaver is the name of a ship in Discovery S3 and Section 31.
I’m not getting the connection. The Wind Cleaver is the name of a ship in Discovery S3 and Section 31.
<sigh>
Link? Or any kind of evidence?
Blue Harvest was the code name of ROTJ.I’m not getting the connection. The Wind Cleaver is the name of a ship in Discovery S3 and Section 31.
It was delayed, if that’s what you mean by backburnered?This goes against everything that I've heard the past 6 months.........but we will see. Last I heard Section 31 had been placed on a back burner.
I know, but what is the thing above about? Blue Harvest isn’t the name of a ship in Star Wars.Blue Harvest was the code name of ROTJ.
I'm sure you get the connection just fine.
Apparently he seems to think that because this is the 'news stories from dubious sources' thread, that this gives him a pass to post stupid fake crap with no sources because he thinks he's being clever.
But evidence would be nice.
Good luck getting any.
Last I heard Section 31 had been placed on a back burner.
That's the point. Why would the code name for the S31 show be the name of the ship?I know, but what is the thing above about? Blue Harvest isn’t the name of a ship in Star Wars.
Well, the working title for 'Strange New World' was EnterpriseTrue. Wind Cleaver is the working title of S31. It seems unlikely, at least to me, that it would be the name of a ship because (1) it’s terrible and (2) I don’t know that the name of the ship would be a working title. I am willing to admit I’m wrong. But evidence would be nice.
Well, I guess a poster can count as a dubious source...
It was delayed, if that’s what you mean by backburnered?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.