Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 1x05 - "Stardust City Rag"

[Jackson_Roykirk]

What would Galaxy Quest even be based on there? Unless you're saying Trek exists in its own fictional universe for GQ to be based upon. That would be really freaking meta.

Here's what meta...

The first Space Shuttle (not space worthy, but used for testing within our atmosphere) was named Enterprise, and was named that specifically in honor of the TV show's hero ship.

Then in various Star Treks (TMP, TNG, ENT) there were models or artwork of all ships to carry the name Enterprise, and one of those ship models/artwork was of the Space Shuttle.

So in-universe, the history of ships named Enterprise includes one named after the fictional TV show ship.

 

[SolarisOne]

So in-universe, the history of ships named Enterprise includes one named after the fictional TV show ship.

Kinda already knew that.

 

[gaghyogi49]

Alright, here's the observations article for "Stardust City Rag". All the gory details you might have missed... ;-)

http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/observations/pic_stardustcityrag.htm

Maybe we can do this again, there are a few more unidentified paintings in Picard's study:

No idea what the one to the left of Seven depicts.

The one to the right of Rios' head looks like a Baroque tapestry showing people in a garden.

 

[matthunter]

Obviously the Trekverse version of Galaxy Quest is a homage to the Orville.

 

[Agony_Boothb]

It's an interesting thought experiment. It's never been quite clear how seriously the Feferation takes its commitment to cultural diversity. Often it comes across as rank hypocrisy; cultures can be different, but only about trivial stuff. It's more useful to think of this as two different values which are sometimes in tension. Sort of like the contemporary USA, which values both religious freedom and equality. Works great until a sexist homphobic church comes along.

Where the line gets drawn... beats me.

I'd say the line gets drawn when a belief or custom impacts the rights of another or requires a life to be taken or the crew members life to be endangered. To use Klingons as an example Picard, Sisko and Janeway seemed pretty tolerant of most klingon customs. However, both Picard and Sisko drew the line at Worf taking a life and Janeway drew the line with B'elanna wanting to risk her own life to visit her mother in sto'vo'kor.

I imagine that most Captain's would treat individual beliefs with an open mind, but whether they allow a crew member to practice those beliefs would depend on whether it breaks Federation law, how it would impact the crew and whether another life would be affected. At the end of the day Starfleet officers from different cultures know that they will have to make sacrifices regarding their cultures for the greater good. If they cannot understand that then they have no right to wear the uniform.

 

[slappy]

OH

MY

GOD

Star Trek is dead. TWOKrap killed it! - The Internet, had it existed in 1982

 

[fireproof78]

OH

MY

GOD

Star Trek is dead. TWOKrap killed it! - The Internet, had it existed in 1982

This is the truth.

Though, this misses the death threats that Meyer and Burnett received.

 

[hbquikcomjamesl]

Oh.That was Icheb in the teaser. I was wondering what that was all about, and how it would tie in with the story.

Good. It would have been better without the (as TVTropes calls it) "eye-scream" in the teaser. That cost it a mandatory 2-point deduction for gratuitous gross-out.

I'd already stumbled onto a spoiler (while looking up the cast on MA) about Jurati

Spoiler

killing Maddox.

It was still shocking.

 

[Reanok]

I recently rewatched This episode and what happened to poor Icheb was really shocking and controversial and how it ties into the story of Seven of Nine's story arc in season one.

Spoiler: Picard spoiler

Also Dr Juratti killing Bruce Maddox was totally unexpected and seeing how it has consequences for Doctor Juratti's story arc too.I wonder how it maybe dealt with in season 2

It was indeed shocking.

 

[hbquikcomjamesl]

That TVTropes has a name, and a page, for "eye scream" says something in and of itself.

Speaking of which, I note that TVTropes lists two additional appearances of the trope, in "Et in Arcadia Ego" parts 1 and 2. Duly noted.

 

[seigezunt]

Recently re-watched, and while it holds up, I do fast-forward through the eyeball horror now.

 

[hbquikcomjamesl]

. . . Sort of like the contemporary USA, which values both religious freedom and equality. Works great until a sexist homphobic church comes along.
Where the line gets drawn... beats me.

I have always been a big believer in the "Next Man's Nose" principle.