• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Picard 1x05 - "Stardust City Rag"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    323
My complaint isn't that it's out of character, it's that I don't know what (if anything) the writers are trying to say, or what the message is that the viewer should take away from the episode. The plot and the antagonists weren't interesting or well-written enough IMO to give the killing any proper impact and it doesn't illuminate or alter anything about Seven's character, nor does it conclude the story in a satisfying or interesting way, so it just ultimately feels like yet more violence added for the sake of it.

The main plot of the episode can be summarised very quickly - the protagonists go to a casino planet, there's an unambiguously evil gang there who torture people to death, Seven shoots the leader to death. I don't think that's an unfairly reductive description of the episode, there's really nothing to the main plot beyond that, so the violence feels unearned to me and the whole thing seems to lack any kind of purpose.

You could probably do a summary like that for every Shakespeare play, but you wouldn't capture the essence. I thought it was pretty obvious what the writers were trying to say. Seven was out for revenge because of Icheb's death, but the real issue was that she felt guilty because she told that woman about him. Big difference. The setup just shows that she has been out there alone for a long time, and her moral frame of reference, which was the Starfleet crew on Voyager, is gone. Her statement about not pulling Picard's gang into her revenge plot to preserve Picard's idealism was key. Picard still upholds that TNG-era Starfleet idealism that the rest of the universe seems to have lost, even after Mars and the Romulan evacuation failure he preserved it (even if he's a little grumpy now). The message is that both she and Picard are struggling to preserve their humanity under these conditions, and by killing Icheb they took some of that humanity from her. That was her breaking point. The narrative is mirroring the situation with Picard and Data's daughter.

Just for context, old Admiral Janeway stole a time crystal from the Klingons and went back in time and altered history, gave them future tech, killed the Borg queen and possibly millions of drones just to save Seven and a few other crewmembers (excluding Carey, who sadly dies a few weeks too early) and get the ship home a little earlier. Seven shot one underworld boss to take revenge for Icheb's death.
 
Now I’ve seen the full episode. I loved all the stuff with Seven though can do without the redshirting of Icheb. The final scene was “One twist too much” though. They need to give the show some solid core of trustworthy characters beyond just Picard. So twists and betrayals are actual surprises.

The business at the bar felt like a Mass Effect mission, you could almost see “Renegade +20” appear on screen at the end.

Nice touch that Quark owned the bar.

If their treatment of familiar characters is to instantly kill them to give this show’s characters a reason to be angry I’d prefer they leave them out.
 
Really? Because it seems fairly obvious to me.

Consider that each episode of PIC, aside from the first episode, starts with a flashback (and the first episode started with Picard’s dream of Data in Ten Forward, thematically the same thing.) This establishes that a leitmotif of this show is people being haunted by the past.

“Stardust City Rag” begins with Icheb’s extremely graphic and painful torture, something that Seven was not able to arrive in time to stop. It’s obvious from context that she and Icheb deepened their relationship upon returning to the Federation. Witnessing such a terrible crime has deeply affected Seven, and it’s the framing device for the entire episode.

In VOY, Seven was portrayed as extremely loyal to people. Her relationship with Janeway was a central feature of the show’s last four seasons. So Icheb’s fate deeply affected Seven. Add to that that the person ultimately responsible for Icheb’s death was the woman she (apparently) had a romantic relationship with. So, Seven has been deeply betrayed by her, in such a way that Seven’s loyalty was broken TWICE.

Ultimately, Seven’s story in this episode is used to show what kind of universe is out there outside the Federation, in former Romulan space. But its real effect on the audience is in our affection for the character of Seven and in showing how her story ties back to one of the ultimate themes of PIC: how broken people, haunted by their past, are driven to do desperate things.

This makes sense as a reading, but I'm somewhat skeptical. Picard, Raffi and Rios are definitely haunted by their pasts, but none have been driven to murder or any other desperate acts, so that doesn't seem like a core theme of the series to me. Seven's killing of the gangster is also not really that desperate - the situation is so uncomplicated and the antagonist so blandly evil with no redeeming traits that there's almost no debate to be had. Perhaps if the gang leader had been depicted in a more nuanced light and/or Seven's response acknowledged and discussed by the script as being morally complicated, I could see the theme of haunted people being pushed into morally dubious acts as being more apparent.

I appreciate that they discuss the morality of killing the gang leader prior to it actually happening, but it feels very lightweight (especially since one of the arguments is just that they'd get smacked around by security).

Death does not always have meaning.

Fiction is generally better when it does, though, right?
 
This makes sense as a reading, but I'm somewhat skeptical. Picard, Raffi and Rios are definitely haunted by their pasts, but none have been driven to murder or any other desperate acts, so that doesn't seem like a core theme of the series to me. Seven's killing of the gangster is also not really that desperate - the situation is so uncomplicated and the antagonist so blandly evil with no redeeming traits that there's almost no debate to be had. Perhaps if the gang leader had been depicted in a more nuanced light and/or Seven's response acknowledged and discussed by the script as being morally complicated, I could see the theme of haunted people being pushed into morally dubious acts as being more apparent.

I appreciate that they discuss the morality of killing the gang leader prior to it actually happening, but it feels very lightweight (especially since one of the arguments is just that they'd get smacked around by security).

Fiction is generally better when it does, though, right?
I believe that one has to factor in the fact that Seven and Bjayzl may have possibly been romantically involved.
To have been deceived by ones "Lover" is one of the rawest emotional impacts a person can be forced into, even more so if it also leads to the death of another loved one.

There's just no getting around the fact that Seven had never experienced something on so high an emotional level.
Her response, built up over time, was most apropos.

Seven's 'trust' in other people has been severely compromised.
Thus why she deceived Picard and had no qualms about it.
 
Last edited:
Bjayzl looked a lot like Troi from the early seasons of TNG. I thought she was Betazoid for a minute.
I kept thinking her name was Vajazzle, or Bejazzle, or Witchhazel. And then Seven called her Jay, and I was like so her name is Jay?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top