I teach primitive worlds about the human concept of love. Don't judge me.
You're not Starfleet Command or the Federation Council.
You're not Starfleet Command or the Federation Council.
Are you showing them what a member of Federation looks like?I teach primitive worlds about the human concept of love. Don't judge me.
In that case, does anybody have an idea what dahj might mean?
the orchid was named after herShe was named after a species of orchid:
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Orchidaceae_Dahj_oncidium
It's genuine Star Trek. The show says so in the title.Within 1 minute of analysis it destroys any hope for Picard to be considered genuine Star Trek.
Link
i've said this before, but i happened to watch this last night, so i'll repeat myself: the fact that they can't be bothered to get simple details about the show right more or less invalidates their ability to critique it. i love red letter media, but shrieking "it's not star trek" over and over again is really a bad look for supposed fans.Try to defend this very objectively.
Within 1 minute of analysis it destroys any hope for Picard to be considered genuine Star Trek.
Link
Why doesnt Earth have a defensive shield like Vashti? It would make all the movies and about a quarter of the episodes obsolete.
Try to defend this very objectively.
Within 1 minute of analysis it destroys any hope for Picard to be considered genuine Star Trek.
Link
cooleddie74@loveinstructor.comI teach primitive worlds about the human concept of love. Don't judge me.
You're not Starfleet Command or the Federation Council.
Try to defend this very objectively.
Within 1 minute of analysis it destroys any hope for Picard to be considered genuine Star Trek.
Link
HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. no. Roddenberry is dead.It's genuine Star Trek. The show says so in the title.
"OMG ONE DETAIL IS WRONG SO THAT MAKES THE REST CRITICISM WRONG TOO". Laughable argument. How can you even pretend to accept that the federation are now racist and bigots in majority?i've said this before, but i happened to watch this last night, so i'll repeat myself: the fact that they can't be bothered to get simple details about the show right more or less invalidates their ability to critique it. i love red letter media, but shrieking "it's not star trek" over and over again is really a bad look for supposed fans.
Ludicrous argument. Why do you care what I think if you don't care what they think since you don't know me either. It seems you are incapable to answer to their criticism at that point and you evaded the question.Why not just say what you think? I really don't give two fucks what someone on YouTube thinks.
she's poor, just not in the way we think about it today.she isn't poor.
Ludicrous argument. Why do you care what I think if you don't care what they think since you don't know me either. It seems you are incapable to answer to their criticism at that point and you evaded the question.
woah ok. my point was that they're either purposefully getting details wrong to be funny or they're not paying enough attention. but they can't miss half the small stuff and bitch about the other small stuff."OMG ONE DETAIL IS WRONG SO THAT MAKES THE REST CRITICISM WRONG TOO". Laughable argument. How can you even pretend to accept that the federation are now racist and bigots in majority?
HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. the show's still called Star Trek and is therefore Star Trek.HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. no. Roddenberry is dead.
Roddenberry is dead.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.