I disagree. I think it would be an irrational choice, but also a constant reminder of why he does what he does. Again, give the psychological trauma Bruce has been through it isn't as out there for the character as it might appear be to us.I think there's a big difference between "I'll base my symbol on something that irrationally frightens me and a lot of other people, especially criminals who are a superstitious and cowardly lot" and "I'll wear the actual physical object that murdered my parents on my chest." The former is understandable -- the latter is sick and depraved.
I disagree. I think it would be an irrational choice, but also a constant reminder of why he does what he does.
Again, give the psychological trauma Bruce has been through it isn't as out there for the character as it might appear be to us.
He lives in a comic book.He dresses up in a mask and goes out at night to beat people up.
I guess it helps that he's untouchably wealthy.
Again, I disgree. I think dismantling that weapon to make his symbol could be an interesting concept. It's not twisting it in to pathology-it's recognizing that Bruce might just see the world differently than others.I hardly think Bruce needs an external reminder of that. And Batman's rejection or outright hatred of guns has been a defining trait of the character since he was barely a year old, despite the grossly false revisionist histories that get propagated today. It would make sense for, say, the Punisher to have an emblem literally made of guns (and the title logo for his TV series essentially did just that), but it would be a fundamental misunderstanding of Batman as a character.
Too many people today twist what Batman does into a symptom of his pathology. What he does is healing. It lets him direct his pain and trauma toward a positive goal, using it to spare others from similar pain. For all that he adopted the Bat-emblem as a symbol of fear, his actions turned it into a symbol of hope, a beacon that rallies the good citizens of Gotham and comforts the afflicted. A logo made out of an actual murder weapon would not do that.
Sure, if your sample size is only those influenced by Frank Miller.
Look how Aparo drew him. Or Maguire.
Batman has often been depicted as fit and flexible. Think more Bruce Lee, not Affleck. And I think that makes more sense. He’s a martial artist not a boxer.
My guess is that this is meant to be a first stage suit. It could be the suit for the entire movie with a new suit coming if future installments happen.I don't care much for the angularness of the chest piece but I like the bat symbol, the cowl and especially the shoulder attachments of the cape. Looking pretty good so far.
Or Denny O'Neil.
I love how "realism" is looked down upon in this settingPredictable as always.![]()
Batman is probably among the more grounded of the DC superheroes. He is the "world's greatest detective" and a martial arts expert. He doesn't have any other super powers. He makes sense to have some more realistic elements.
Finally! A Black and White Batman picture I can get behindYeah the movie will fail big time because you can only see half of his face.
And the movie is probably black and white because the picture is, so I hate the movie![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.