Spoilers Star Trek: Picard General Discussion Thread

[Noname Given]

So an interview last week, Akiva Goldsman said that Data's download into B4 will remain significant for the rest of the season. I wonder what he means.

In Ep. 2:

Spoiler

We see how the Synths behaved normally just before the override that made them attack the facility. I bet the writers will show the Daystom institute and Maddox used 'positronic neurons' from B-4 to create the Mars Synths.

It is the nature of TV and film generally - TNG came our 33 years ago - we are never going back. It would be like telling people in 1987 - "Make sure it feels like a show made in 1954 1966".

^^^
FTFY - Oh, an BTW that WAS the argument TNG fans in 1987 were telling us TOS fans when we protested a LOT of the changes and retcons to the Trek Universe presented in TNG in 1987 going forward...

 

[JLBTucker]

Well the first two seasons of TNG were bad so we'll see what happens next tho im not paying for the bad streaming service to see

 

[JLBTucker]

In Ep. 2:

Spoiler

We see how the Synths behaved normally just before the override that made them attack the facility. I bet the writers will show the Daystom institute and Maddox used 'positronic neurons' from B-4 to create the Mars Synths.

^^^
FTFY - Oh, an BTW that WAS the argument TNG fans in 1987 were telling us TOS fans when we protested a LOT of the changes and retcons to the Trek Universe presented in TNG in 1987 going forward...

Also hearing about Synths makes me think of Fallout 4, thats not a good thing

 

[BillJ]

Well the first two seasons of TNG were bad so we'll see what happens next tho im not paying for the bad streaming service to see

A streaming service isn't "good" or "bad", it simply is.

 

[Tuskin38]

Also hearing about Synths makes me think of Fallout 4, thats not a good thing

It's just short for synthetics, there's nothing more than that.

 

[JLBTucker]

It's just short for synthetics, there's nothing more than that.

I really dont want to explain the joken lol

 

[Tuskin38]

I really dont want to explain the joken lol

I've played Fallout 4.

 

[JLBTucker]

I've played Fallout 4.

spoilers its very mediocre

 

[Tuskin38]

spoilers its very mediocre

I loved it.

 

[BillJ]

spoilers its very mediocre

My wife put about 200 hours into it.

 

[fireproof78]

Also hearing about Synths makes me think of Fallout 4, thats not a good thing

Why not? The Institute is fantastic and a lot of fun. The story is not the best, but I had a blast with Fallout 4.

I would be happy if PIC has some fun with the Synths like Fallout 4 did.

My wife put about 200 hours into it.

Nice. I've done the same with Fallout 3 and New Vegas.

 

[Tuskin38]

Nice. I've done the same with Fallout 3 and New Vegas.

Same here, and Fallout 4.

 

[JLBTucker]

4 was a step down from 1 2 3 and new vegas

 

[fireproof78]

4 was a step down from 1 2 3 and new vegas

Doesn't make it bad.

 

[JLBTucker]

Doesn't make it bad.

never said it was I said it was painfully
Mediocre

 

[fireproof78]

never said it was I said it was painfully
Mediocre

Which is OK.

 

[JLBTucker]

Which is OK.

Well now we see were the mediocre slippery slope goes, Dumpster fire 76

 

[fireproof78]

Well now we see were the mediocre slippery slope goes, Dumpster fire 76

Yup, that happened.

Didn't take away from my enjoyment of 3, NV or 4 though. So, it's OK.

 

[JLBTucker]

Yup, that happened.

Didn't take away from my enjoyment of 3, NV or 4 though. So, it's OK.

I don't have alot of hope for Fallout 5, point of my original post was I dont really like the direction of new Trek and will stick to STO

 

[fireproof78]

I don't have alot of hope for Fallout 5, point of my original post was I dont really like the direction of new Trek and will stick to STO

That is a fair point.