The evidence from the first episode suggests the "rogue synths" weren't really self-aware themselves, doesn't it?
Great eighties tribute band though.
The evidence from the first episode suggests the "rogue synths" weren't really self-aware themselves, doesn't it?
but for the purpose of the show...it kinda does. To say the character's story in this new show doesn't start right there is a little bit like watching Batman Begins and saying, well Bruce Wayne as a character starts in Detective Comis No. 27Picard as a character doesn’t start in Picard
Quite so. Beyond some of the terrible plot holes, what I’ve missed in Discovery is the sense of friendship and family. I see it a thousand times more between Picard and Dahj from a five minute chat than I do between Michael and Saru, however hard they have tried to shoehorn it in towards the end of S2. It’s what made Airiam’s death so underwhelming, for example.But it still doesn’t work. Because Picard as a character doesn’t start in Picard, and Burnham does not start in episode 3. Both characters only work by contrasting, and Burnham has so little to contrast with (which is part of what makes it hard for some viewers to empathise with her, especially when she is so tightly focused on and is generally presented as something of a Mary Poppins.) and makes her arc very truncated.
As I said...she is Tom Paris. Imagine the first season of Voyager focused so tightly on him that we don’t even know more than a few other characters have names (let’s say...Janeway, Tuvok, maybe B’Ellana, and definitely Harry Kim, as he’s a ginger wig away from being Tilly.) would it have worked? One of the things DSC has improved is by remembering the Trek milieu has always to some degree worked on ensemble, certainly it’s most successful iterations did (the films and TNG).
But it still doesn’t work. Because Picard as a character doesn’t start in Picard, and Burnham does not start in episode 3. Both characters only work by contrasting, and Burnham has so little to contrast with (which is part of what makes it hard for some viewers to empathise with her, especially when she is so tightly focused on and is generally presented as something of a Mary Poppins.) and makes her arc very truncated.
As I said...she is Tom Paris. Imagine the first season of Voyager focused so tightly on him that we don’t even know more than a few other characters have names (let’s say...Janeway, Tuvok, maybe B’Ellana, and definitely Harry Kim, as he’s a ginger wig away from being Tilly.) would it have worked? One of the things DSC has improved is by remembering the Trek milieu has always to some degree worked on ensemble, certainly it’s most successful iterations did (the films and TNG).
Same here, other than referencing a couple of moments to refresh my memory in order to make a point or two, I'm waiting till at least Tuesday or Wednesday to rewatch the entire show again.All the immediate rewatching seems odd to me. I gotta let it marinate for a few days before dipping back in for another taste.
I'm comparing two shows and two specific narratives. Again, Burnham and Paris are very different characters.
Quite so. Beyond some of the terrible plot holes, what I’ve missed in Discovery is the sense of friendship and family. I see it a thousand times more between Picard and Dahj from a five minute chat than I do between Michael and Saru, however hard they have tried to shoehorn it in towards the end of S2. It’s what made Airiam’s death so underwhelming, for example.
I wonder if Maddox has been captured by the Romulans and was tortured and/or killed for his knowledge?I think -- I think -- after Data died, Maddox was trying to see if he could create another android like Data or even improve upon him. I think he made it pretty far along when the Federation banned any further development of "synths", so Maddox went into hiding to continue his research. I think out of that came Dahj and Soji.
When you start with a character you adore vs a character you dislike immensely, of course you will have a different reaction when you watch them.
Would explain why B4 so completely malfunctioned once Data's info was DL'd, he didn't have a twin hard-drive for backup.I could see Data physically putting one inside Lal to grow. That could be what he was doing at the beginning of The Offspring. Dahj/Soji May have Lal in them.
The twins thing also springs to mind, as Data/Lore may have been closer together than we thought. B4 throws a spanner in that, but always did.
I wonder if Maddox has been captured by the Romulans and was tortured and/or killed for his knowledge?
They really aren’t. The only difference is the Vulcan stuff they lifted from Spock and Tuvok. Burnham is Nick Locarno 3.0 with a side of Babylon 5 angst.
Edit: just to expand, and I have said this before:
Does naughty thing, dishonrable discharge, in the stockade. Captain picks them up as ‘special advisor’, Starfleet crew hates them. Befriends wet behind the ears recruit with overbearing mother who is a bit of an engineering/science prodigy (who wants in on the command track) Is also the child of high ranking bigwig in the federation/Starfleet, with a strained relationship. Finds new place with crew, and falls in love with a half-Klingon character.
Burnham has a lot of Paris DNA. A lot.
There was a scene in an earlier promo trailer of a conversation between Picard and an older bearded man who is lying on a bed, perhaps dying from an illness.
Could this man be Maddox? Orcould he be Q, because beneath his beard, the man looked like John de Lancie to me
The complete lack of mention of Lore is very jarring, especially as his body was in Starfleet custody and they'd have access to him to recreate androids.
Folks guessed this a while back, and it isn’t the same actor IIRC. The actor who played Maddox is alive and seemingly active, and I really hope they got him to come back and reprise the role.There was a scene in an earlier promo trailer of a conversation between Picard and an older bearded man who is lying on a bed, perhaps dying from an illness.
Could this man be Maddox? Orcould he be Q, because beneath his beard, the man looked like John de Lancie to me
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.