If you can look at all this and honestly conclude that there is zero evidence to so much as doubt that the RJ trilogy is still a go... well, I think that's bonkers.
Even if you semantically argue away your own wording of "lacks evidence" as not equaling zero evidence, as I already quoted, yes:Has someone said that?
"No evidence" is functionally synonymous with "zero evidence." And not for the first time with him:But there is no evidence to suggest its been cancelled
There’s no reason to believe otherwise until we have evidence. We don’t.
And then there's:
"That we know of" seems to cast doubt where there is no cause for doubt.
And then there's you again:
So, yeah, there are numerous people here pretty much, and sometimes outright, saying there is "zero evidence" to doubt the RJ trilogy.we have no information...![]()