• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Episode IX Speculation and Discussion

The original film had scenes whose very purpose was exposition dumps, e.g. the attack briefing, Obi-Wan's abode where we hear backstory and hear the full message from Leia, the cantina when we meat Han, etc. So stopping scenes in their tracks wasn't an issue. We get fewer of those these days, and I'm sure many people are happier for it.
I feel that in general, audiences have become less tolerant of expository dialogue that interrupts the flow of the story, which is why so many films now open with narration.
 
Conspiracy theories often feature individuals or groups who are simultaneously incompetent failures AND genius-level criminal masterminds.

Norman... coordinate!

WO6opID.jpg
 
If it's important enough for a character in the scene to ask where it came from, then it's important enough for an audience member to ask too.

If we saw that Artoo had Obi-Wan's old saber that he left on the Death Star, wouldn't you wanna know how the heck that came about?

Not really, no.

I'm not saying it's unreasonable to ask the question, to wonder, even imagine the backstory a bit. But it's just a simple object. It's not super powerful, super dangerous or worth a fortune. I see no logical reason why any story should go out of its way to tell how a simple object thought lost long ago found its way into a mysterious box for the hero to open. Sometimes an air of mystery is just an air of mystery to give a scene more gravitas and not an open invitation for deeper storytelling.

I'm totally on board that elements like Snoke and the First Order are at least somewhat undermined by their lack of context and can sometimes feel hollow because of it. Those are questions that probably need some kind of answer (however brief). But the lightsaber is exactly what it looks like and it does exactly what all other lightsabers do. There's no there there. There is zero important information regarding it that the audience doesn't have already. You might as well give us explanations of why Maul and Kylo use unusual lightsaber designs. Or how Han got his lucky dice and why they call him Solo.
 
I don't think its unfair to suggest an audience member can't ask the question. Of course they can. My perspective though is that its not the filmmaker's job to answer all questions that the audience might have. It is the filmmaker's job to answer all questions relevant to the story. And yeah, in the overarcing story, I think that the questions you suggest are important. BUT, when you're building a franchise film, one that honestly, we're following up on the previous one (ROTJ) from thirty years prior, fans are going to have a lot of questions. If you spend your entire movie answering questions, that might not be the most entertaining movie out there. TFA's job was to:
  1. Continue the Star Wars saga post Return of the Jedi
  2. Reignite the passion in old fans
  3. Bring new fans into the fold
  4. Tell an entertaining story
Of course, your mileage may vary on any of those. Is it perfect? Fuck no. But again, I think it did an admirable job.

Fans obviously want to know about Snoke, but as Rian Johnson suggested:



So questions such as who Snoke is, how did the saber get there, what's with the political dealings in the galaxy? I understand they're something that some fans want to but they're not that important to the story at large.

Also every question answered is a mystery lost, something whose importance shouldn't be overlooked in building the mythos. Those unknowns are precisely where fans inject their own interpretations and creativity, where they put part of themselves into the process.

As for Snoke, he was Mace Windu.
 
Conspiracy theories often feature individuals or groups who are simultaneously incompetent failures AND genius-level criminal masterminds.

Funnily enough so does MENSA.

By the way, @CorporalCaptain having given the question some in depth analysis over the past two seconds or so I've come to the uninformed conclusion that the falling object was Lukes' hand.
 
When it comes to the lightsaber, I don't really see why there has to be some dramatic story worth telling. Somebody probably just stumbled across it and either gave it to Maz because they knew she was interested in that kind of stuff, or she found it and bought it off them.
I'm curious if we're going to learn more about Snoke, but he really isn't actually that important to the overall story. He was just a way for Kylo Ren to be drawn away from Luke and he's served that purpose now. I wouldn't mind getting some backstory on him, but it's really not a make or break thing for me.
The only thing I'm really expecting to get more information on at this point is Rey's origins, and that's only because the people involved have said there is more to that story.
As for backstory for the First Order, New Republic, and Resistance that's all been covered pretty well in the books and comics, and really isn't that important to Rey, Finn and Poe's story, so I don't see a need for the movies to go into detail on that.
John Boyega has admitted that it was his script that ended up on Ebay. Apparently he was in the process of moving, and stuck it under his bed until the next morning, but his friends showed up and they spent the night partying. When he got up the next morning, he forgot it and left without it.
 
By the way, @CorporalCaptain having given the question some in depth analysis over the past two seconds or so I've come to the uninformed conclusion that the falling object was Lukes' hand.

I always figured it was a piece of the weathervane or something, but let's say it is his hand. If someone actually did cut one's hand off, would the muscles release, thereby letting go of anything in said hand? Or would it continue to hold?
 
I always figured it was a piece of the weathervane or something, but let's say it is his hand. If someone actually did cut one's hand off, would the muscles release, thereby letting go of anything in said hand? Or would it continue to hold?

There are no more muscles attached, so... It's not going to hold onto anything.
 
Going back to the lightsaber, IIRC one of the original openings for TFA would have shown the saber floating through space for some reason.

There's also a deleted scene from TFA where Maz hands the lightsaber to Leia (it's in the second teaser trailer)
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top