As for the Earth facility on Vulcan in ENT, the facility seem to have a lot of Starfleet personnel and they could be seen to basically be running the place,
The facility seen on Vulcan in ENT is literally established as the United Earth Embassy. Its security appears to be provided by United Earth Starfleet personnel in 2154 -- but given Archer's insistence in ENT Season Two that the UESF is not a military force, I imagine another organization may have been providing security at the U.E. Embassy before then. But that's just a guess.
Nope. It should remain a federal district, and under the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress.The Residence Act of 1790.
Fuck the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress and fuck the Residency Act of 1790. These are arcane laws whose only practical effect in the real world is to prevent the fulfillment of the civil rights and liberties of the residents of the District of Columbia. The law -- and the Constitution -- should be changed.
I could actually see a small section of Paris (where the Federation buildings are supposedly located) to be officially not a part of Paris or France or even Earth.
Is
Parliament Hill officially not part of the Province of Ontario? Is the
Reichstag legally not a part of the State of Berlin? There's not really a compelling reason to legally separate the Federation capitol (called the Palais de la Concorde in the novels) from the rest of United Earth.
Franz Joseph (in his tech manual) placed the Federation council and associated functions on a large, well protected, space station. I not sure where the station was located.
While the president of the Federation maintains a office on Earth, was it ever clearly stated that the council exclusively meets on Earth?
Nope. The canon is ambiguous -- one might also speculate that the Federation Council has rotating meetings on every Federation planet. However, while there is no canonical evidence to
oppose the Federation government meeting at other locations, there is also no canonical evidence to
support their meeting on any planet other than Earth.
Deneva was an Earth colony, then Federation colony. It would be represented in the council under the human memberworld umbrella.
In the novels, Deneva becomes its own separate Federation Member State with its own president and its own Federation Councillor by the 2370s.
If a thousand former Earth colonies or Preserver preserves are discovered after 2161, and they want to join, I think they’d send representatives to the humans’ legislature (like any other human planet — including Earth, Luna, Mars, Alpha Centauri, etc) and then that body would send representative(s) to the Federation Council. Otherwise, again, species can game the system to allow their nations or biological quirks uneven influence.
The canon has established that the Federation gets to decide whether or not to allow a given planetary or multiplanetary state to join the UFP. I think that the existing Member States' Federation Councillors would simply vote against "flags of convenience" joining the UFP as nominally separate members actually under an existing Member State's thumb.
There are two issues here. One, that the Federation is a union of aliens, each with their own biological as well as cultural differences. A government that can speak for one species many not be able to for another. Say the Bynars are part individual part collective — do they get one vote in a general election or 17 billion?
I mean, it may well be that the Federation's basic idea of proper governance is just not compatible with every species out there and some cultures will just never join the UFP in the first place.
Two, look at the nomadic Betelgeusians. Say for them every planet, moon, station, asteroid, and starship is a completely independent body from every other. Do they get 126,034 votes in the council?
This would almost certainly be negotiated during the process of their becoming a Member State. The Federation Council might well demand a certain level of unity amongst them before accepting them as Members.
So a goid question is, what is the federation government like? We attribute it to American republic system with a president, council, and maybe a legislative branch of some sort.
Canonically, it has been established that there is an elected Federation President who is commander-in-chief of the armed forces ("Paradise Lost"), who sets Federation foreign policy (TUC), who has the authority to declare States of Emergency over parts of Federation territory that can suspend certain civil rights and liberties during a crisis ("Homefront"), who can preside over certain special courts-martial of Starfleet officers (TVH), and who has the authority to pardon people who have been convicted of crimes ("Will You Take My Hand?"); a Federation Cabinet subordinate to the President ("Extreme Measures"); a well-developed bureaucracy within an executive branch (every single "Federation Department of whatever" from throughout the shows); a Federation Council ("Amok Time") comprised of representatives of Federation Member States ("Rapture") with the authority to pass binding law over the entirety of Federation territory ("Forces of Nature"); a Federation judicial system which includes Federation grand juries ("The Ascent"); and a Federation Supreme Court possessing the power of judicial review over statutory law ("Dr. Bashir, I Presume?"). It has also been established that there is a Federation Constitution ("The Perfect Mate") which enumerates certain protections for civil rights and liberties to all persons within Federation territory and aboard Federation starships ("The Drumhead," "Author, Author").
What if the counsel is like the UN ruling councel, and each "Spicies" gets 1 vote I.e. 1 human, 1 vulcan, etc. Regardless of amount of colonies etc. So 150 member soicies, 150 member Council.
So, the difference here is that the United Nations is an international organization that lacks sovereignty and cannot make foreign policy. There is no "U.N. ruling counsel." There's the General Assembly and the Security Council, but those are essentially international bodies that exist to provide a forum for the conduct of international relations between sovereign states. The U.N. has certain authorities delegated to it by treaty, but it does not have the powers we have seen the Federation possess.
Now could have a "house of representatives" type of lower body that has a represinative from every member world and colony, and if able protectorate representative. This way, each individual world would be represented in some way. And maybe the counsel members are confirmed by the house that represents each speces, ie all human worlds and colonies would vote for the 1 human council rep.
This way all worlds would be represented in the federation, not just the main human, vulcan etc. World's.
I mean, this gets back to the old question of whether or not a federal state should represent all of its constituent polities equally or in proportion to their population level. In real life, I'm in favor of proportional representation -- but in the world of Star Trek, where we're talking about trying to represent not just entire planets, but possibly entire multi-planetary states within a Federation comprised of trillions... I'm not entirely convinced that the scale is not so large as to render proportional representation and or polity representation basically the same in terms of practical effect. When the scale gets that large, it's questionable whether or not one way or the other is truly more democratic.
So you're OK with residents of present day DC having absolutely no say in the governance of their city?
"Taxation without representation" is not just a pithy phrase. It's a very real, and unfortunate, fact of life in DC. And it needs to stop. NOW.
This. This this this.
I'd be okay with stripping out the residential sections of DC and reincorporating them into the state they original were a part of.
Yeah, no. The people of the District do not want that, and the people of Maryland do not want that. Their political cultures are distinct and conflicting, and they don't want to be forced under one roof.
You
might get the peoples of the District and of the counties surrounding the District to agree to join together to form a new state. That would actually make sense, since the economies and political cultures of the counties surrounding D.C. are much more tied
to D.C. than to Annapolis or Richmond.
In DC you're never more than a few miles from being not in DC, as a adult you make a conscious decision to either move to a area where you wouldn't be about to vote, or if raised there stay in a area where you wouldn't be about to vote.
I drive 19 miles between my home and place of work, if I worked in DC, I'd be able to vote.
As others have explained, this is a ridiculous argument made from a place of unexamined privilege.
It is also
absurd to expect a community of over half a million people to move in order to receive their natural right to representation in the legislature.
150 member
WORLDS. I assume the Federation definition of "world" is important. They must have requirements for minimum population size, etc. If you don't meet the minimum requirements, then you may join the Federation, but you won't get a vote or an equal vote (tossed in with a conglomeration of other small worlds with only one vote). YMMV
It is probably a lot more useful to think of it in terms of
member states than in terms of
planet. Like, Hawaii is not part of the Union because it is a series of islands; it is part of the Union because it has statehood. It's a question of political incorporation, not geography per se.
In TNG we heard of planets that were apparently owned by a corporation.
That is incredibly dystopian, and I don't remember it at all.
Yes, D.C. statehood is the
only remedy.
The only reason it’s not already a state is the republicans don’t want to create two more blue Senate seats.
No, there's one other reason: If the District of Columbia were granted statehood, it would be the only state in the Union that would be majority non-white and majority-Black. D.C. statehood would be a profound blow against white domination of our political structures, and the modern Republican Party will never consent to that. Same reason they'll never consent to Puerto Rican statehood.
I've never seen the Federation president's position as important or powerful as the US President. Seems like the Federation president is more like the president or chairman of the council.
The only time we ever see the Federation President presiding over the Council is in TVH; it is implied that this is an extraordinary circumstance. We don't see any other indication of the relationship between the President and the Council -- we don't know, for instance, if the President is normally the presiding officer of the Council.
What we
do know is that his full title is "President of the United Federation of Planets." It seems highly probable to me that there is a difference between the President of the Federation and the President of the Federation Council, just like how there's a difference in real life between President of the United States and President of the United States Senate.
The Federation President is established to be an elected position in "Paradise Lost." That strongly implies to me that it is a popularly-elected position. The only democratic government of which I am aware that features a non-ceremonial President elected by the legislature is the Republic of South Africa, where the President of the Republic is elected by the National Assembly (the lower house of Parliament). This is unusual amongst most national constitutions, and it stems from the fact that the South African Presidency evolved out of the old apartheid government's prime ministership.
The Federation presidency as depicted in the canon seems comparable in authority over the Federation and its Member States to the U.S. presidency. Like, we don't see him asking the Federation Council for permission to invade Klingon space to retrieve Kirk and McCoy in TUC.
I disagree with memory alpha. The federation was more a grouping of sovereign planets, there's no indication that once a part of the federation that the planets lose any power to a central entity.
Sure there is. The Federation Council gets to make binding law over all Federation territory and vessels ("Force of Nature"), the Federation Constitution guarantees certain civil rights and liberties throughout all of Federation territory and on all Federation vessels ("The Perfect Mate"), and the Federation President can declare States of Emergency over areas of Federation territory that suspend certain civil rights and liberties during a crisis ("Homefront").
You can't point to the UN, or NATO, or the EU, and say it just like this.
The closest comparison would be the European Union, to which the E.U. Member States have clearly delegated some of their sovereignty and which may yet evolve into a sovereign state in its own right.
The comparison does not work at all with either the U.N. or NATO, neither of which possess defined territories over which they are sovereign, nor constitutions that enumerate certain civil rights and liberties, nor armed forces that obey their governments, nor actual governments per se.
We haven’t seen sufficient evidence to suggest the nature of the UFP presidency.
No, we've seen a
lot of evidence to suggest the nature of the UFP presidency. We haven't seen enough to get a full picture, but we do know some important things from the powers we have seen canonical Federation Presidents exercise.
Seeing is believing. Except for non-Fed ships with full Klingon, Romulan and Cardassian crews, all Federation Starships seen on screen
All two dozen of them, out of a fleet of hundreds and a Federation of hundreds of planets. We haven't seen enough starship or starbase crews to make educated inferences.
Which is weird in itself. What happened to Starfleet, that explicitly Andorian organization from ENT (only with a funny translation for its alien name)? Or Starfleet, an explicitly Tellarite organization? At least we know that Starfleet, that explicitly Vulcan organization, was purged as if Stalin himself were at it - the whole thing probably ceased to exist in the following years.
Star Trek Beyond established that the MACOs were absorbed into the Federation Starfleet after the UFP was established. The novels are non-canonical, but the
Rise of the Federation miniseries establishes that the United Earth Starfleet, Andorian Imperial Guard, and Vulcan, Tellarite, and Alpha Centauri space forces were merged into the new Federation Starfleet. Each of the services continued to exist as divisions of the new UFP Starfleet (under the command and control of the Federation government, not their originating member state governments) for at least the first century of the Federation Starfleet's existence.
While the Federation president does self-proclaim to be the Starfleet commander in chief,
Starfleet officers refer to him as the commander-in-chief in "Paradise Lost."
One reason I favor corporations being federation members is I think it would be interesting if the members had a diverse collection of governing forms.
Considering the Federation's attitude towards Ferengi capitalism, this seems implausible.