Helping those filthy Baku!
Arguably, DS9 itself (rather than the wormhole) was never important to the Dominion. It mattered to Dukat, but that was down to his obsessive ego, not any military strategy.
Agreed. Especially considering all 3 shows (TNG, DS9 and VOY) were filmed on the same studio lot. When TNG went to the movies, the Paramount lot was on the other side of the studio, I seem to recall.
I don’t know why they didn’t do more with what they had. Cross-pollinate and motivate viewers to watch the other shows. VOY had an excuse. But TNG has Quark speak to Riker for something mundane and Basir use the science labs in one episode. That was it.
In another world, I would’ve done a big boss crossover for TNG season 7 (which was a wasteland of ideas and good stories), with DS9.
I don’t know why Paramount made the ENT-E a movie exclusive ship, but i would’ve definitely included it on a battle in DS9.
Maybe TPTB just didn’t have the imagination or involve with where television was at the time.
Arguably, DS9 itself (rather than the wormhole) was never important to the Dominion. It mattered to Dukat, but that was down to his obsessive ego, not any military strategy.
It really does seem like a lack of imagination. I'm sure a large part of the thinking was that DS9 needed to establish its own identity and not be beholden to TNG, but they really did miss an opportunity to do something bold and interesting with their now-larger universe.
You're right, the Quark cameo on DS9 was very pointless and only mildly amusing. As much as I enjoyed Bashir in "Birthright", you could cut him completely out of the episode without it affecting the plot at all. Lursa and B'Etor on DS9 felt utterly forced and unnecessary.
Oh, well.
Sequel =/= Crossover. Not in the way most people think about it.But Preemptive Strike is a crossover episode. It's a direct sequel to "The Maquis" two parter on DS9. It's also, however, a character focus episode for Ro, and a conclusion to her story.
It's interesting. The complaint I always hear is that early DS9 was "relying on TNG by shoehorning its characters into its show," and I hear it even more often for Voyager(which had even more crossover).
Something like "Ro and Kira team up" seems like something that might happen in a novel(or comic book. "Crossover events" is a comic book thing, right?), but would really serve no good purpose on the actual show.
But Preemptive Strike is a crossover episode. It's a direct sequel to "The Maquis" two parter on DS9. It's also, however, a character focus episode for Ro, and a conclusion to her story.
It's interesting. The complaint I always hear is that early DS9 was "relying on TNG by shoehorning its characters into its show," and I hear it even more often for Voyager(which had even more crossover).
Something like "Ro and Kira team up" seems like something that might happen in a novel(or comic book. "Crossover events" is a comic book thing, right?), but would really serve no good purpose on the actual show.
Sequel =/= Crossover. Not in the way most people think about it.
Besides, Preemptive Strike and The Maqui were both preambles to the then upcoming VOY show. Attempts to inspire intrigue in the new Trek. VOY never kept that promise that TNG and DS9 set up for it. The two episodes work well enough as standalone.
The Ro and Kira subplot is the show that there was tangible drama there to explor. Between a popular recurring character on TNG and a main character on DS9. Remember, the role of Kira Nerys on DS9 was originally written for Ro Laren. But the actress didn't want to make that kind of commitment.
Kira and Ro are similar. Kira is a former terrorist/freedom fighter with Maqui sympathies. Ro Laren is a Starfleet officer, who would be at the rank of Lt CMDR, had she not be court martialed. Early Kira was climbing out of the darkness, while Ro Laren sinks into it by joining the Maqui. The drama comes from how simlar they are and how they differ. Ro threw her career, friendship and mentor relationship with Picard away to join the Maqui. Kira was hostile to Sisko and Starfleet at the beginning of DS9. When the Maqui first arrived, Kira was sympathetic to their cause. However, Kira would not betray Sisko, Dax, Odo and Bajor to join the Maqui. She'd be tempted but would not let herself be entrapped. Mainly because Kira is a recurring character and Ro and TNG were at the end of their respective stories.
Sisko, Picard and Riker justify their presence by virtue of Maqui sympathizing Starfleet officers stealing a Nebula Class (equal in performance to a Galaxy Class). Not far fetched, when you consider Chakotay, Cal Hudson, Michael Eddington, Tom Riker, Ro Laren and others defected from Starfleet.
The Maqui and their sympathizers (including Kassidy Yates) were using DS9 for trafficking and other purposes for years on DS9. Perfect for Odo and Worf to investigate.
Have Dax & Data and Geordi & O'Brien try to track down the stolen Starfleet vessel.
Beverly and Bashir..... Right, moving on.
Have Deanna assist with interviewing and interrogating capture Maqui members,
Let Gul Dukat drop by and have an exchange with Picard. Mention Gul Macet (another Cardassian Mark Alaimo played in TNG season 4). Say he's Dukat's twin brother.
Have a debate between the crews on how to stop the Nebula. Take it alive or destroy it and lose all hands. Including former Federation and Starfleet personnel. if they refuse to surrender peaceful or provoke the ENT-D into a battle.
The story writes itself. It's more than just Kira and Ro.
Who complained that DS9 shoehorned TNG characters into it? Because that's a ridiculous complaint. I'll allow that Q-Less was ill-conceived fan service, as was the pointless, but thankfully brief and inconsequential appearance of the Klingon sisters, but beyond that, it's not an argument that carries a lot of water.
If that's the case, then a story began on TNG, was continued on DS9, then continued on TNG, then continued again on DS9. While "Preemptive Strike" isn't exactly "The Maquis part 3," it is a direct sequel. Admiral Nechayev goes to Picard about some colonists, a settlement is reached. Then a cardassian ship is sabatoged. A group called "The Maquis" claims responsibility. The admiral goes to Sisko to resolve the issue. He stops the immediate threat, but fails to resolve or reason with the Maquis while in their infancy. He also discovers that the Cardassians were shipping weapons to their colonists. She then goes back to Picard and asks him to get an infiltrator into the Maquis, so that Starfleet can arrest them. She references the events of both the DS9 episode and the earlier TNG episode.As MACO pointed out, a loose sequel is not the same as a crossover. It, of course, wasn't a direct sequel to "The Maquis", it just picked up that vague story thread, which was actually first laid in TNG's "Journey's End."
Most recently and from memory? The Pensky File, which brought it up quite often in early DS9, but I've heard/seen similar complaints many times over the last few years; that early DS9 was relying on TNG characters, format of storytelling, plot devices, etc, and that DS9 didn't 'get good' until it really dedicated itself to being its own thing.Who complained that DS9 shoehorned TNG characters into it? Because that's a ridiculous complaint. I'll allow that Q-Less was ill-conceived fan service, as was the pointless, but thankfully brief and inconsequential appearance of the Klingon sisters, but beyond that, it's not an argument that carries a lot of water.
O'Brien was absolutely a TNG character, just like Vorik was a Voyager character. He was there from season 1 up until he left during season 6Not much more of a TNG character than, say, Quark was.)
Just to play devil's advocate (because I don't believe in that argument either), O'Brien and then definitely Worf being in the main cast? Not exactly shoehorned, but I know that those two were complaints at the time.
If that's the case, then a story began on TNG, was continued on DS9, then continued on TNG, then continued again on DS9. While "Preemptive Strike" isn't exactly "The Maquis part 3," it is a direct sequel. Admiral Nechayev goes to Picard about some colonists, a settlement is reached. Then a cardassian ship is sabatoged. A group called "The Maquis" claims responsibility. The admiral goes to Sisko to resolve the issue. He stops the immediate threat, but fails to resolve or reason with the Maquis while in their infancy. He also discovers that the Cardassians were shipping weapons to their colonists. She then goes back to Picard and asks him to get an infiltrator into the Maquis, so that Starfleet can arrest them. She references the events of both the DS9 episode and the earlier TNG episode.
Then there's another DS9 episode(The Defiant) which follows up on both TNG's Preemptive Strike(even featuring the same Maquis character Ro was working with, played by the same actress), and TNG's Second Chances, and features Riker. By this point, TNG has ended, and DS9 continues the Maquis storyline on its own(which isn't so much about the Maquis, but Sisko's vendetta).
Is it Marvel Infinity War? No. Is it "X-men teams up with Justice league"? No, but it is genuine crossover, and done in the areas/storylines that make the most sense for a crossover to occur between TNG and DS9, just like Voyager used the most logical ways for a crossover to occur on their show later on(Q, contact with Starfleet, Barclay, Barclay and Zimmerman, Barclay and Troi, etc).
Since DS9 was threatened with cancellation, if things didn't tighten up
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.