In The Enterprise Incident, Checkov was able to locate Spock on the Romulan ship using sensors to distinguish Vulcan life signs, although he said it was difficult because Vulcans and Romulans are so similar.Romulans and Vulcans are the same race.
In The Enterprise Incident, Checkov was able to locate Spock on the Romulan ship using sensors to distinguish Vulcan life signs, although he said it was difficult because Vulcans and Romulans are so similar.Romulans and Vulcans are the same race.
In The Enterprise Incident, Checkov was able to locate Spock on the Romulan ship using sensors to distinguish Vulcan life signs, although he said it was difficult because Vulcans and Romulans are so similar.
I’m still confused with how it ended. Picard quotes some milquetoast legal bromide, the scenery-chewing lady has a tantrum and storms out...and we’re done.
^^^Picard inviting the "spy" to his quarters, falls in line with him not wanting to blow up the crystalline entity before talking to it, and offering lowered shields in dangerous situations all the time. He sticks to his morals even if it's the riskier thing to do & why he's the best captain
NECHAYEV: Captain, I've read the report that you submitted to Admiral Brooks last year regarding the Borg you called Hugh, and I've been trying to figure out why you let him go.
PICARD: I thought that I had made that clear.
NECHAYEV: As I understand, it you found a single Borg at a crash site, brought it aboard the Enterprise, studied it, analysed it, and eventually found a way to send it back to the Borg with a programme that would have destroyed the entire collective once and for all. But instead, you nursed the Borg back to health, treated it like a guest, gave it a name, and then sent it home. Why?
PICARD: When Hugh was separated from the Borg collective he began to grow and to evolve into something other than an automaton. He became a person. When that happened, I felt I had no choice but to respect his rights as an individual.
NECHAYEV: Of course you had a choice. You could've taken the opportunity to rid the Federation of a mortal enemy, one that has killed tens of thousands of innocent people, and which may kill even more.
PICARD: No one is more aware of the danger than I am. But I am also bound by my oath and my conscience to uphold certain principles. And I will not sacrifice them in order to...
NECHAYEV: Your priority is to safeguard the lives of Federation citizens, not to wrestle with your conscience. Now I want to make it clear that if you have a similar opportunity in the future, an opportunity to destroy the Borg, you are under orders to take advantage of it. Is that understood?
PICARD: Yes, sir.
Actually Jean Simmons wasn't a fan and was going to pass; but her grandchildren were big fans and said she should do it, so she ultimately did.Watching it now, did not know Jean Simmons was a Star Trek and wanted to be on the show. I wonder in universe where is Troi?
I thought the reasons why he felt he had to hide his ancestry showed how bigoted Starfleet was, its not his fault his grandfather was a Romulan. Saavik never did.
Starfleet is not bigoted.
The problem was NOT that Tarses' grandfather was Romulan. The problem was that Tarses LIED about it. He didn't have to do that. If he'd just come clean and admitted the truth from the get-go, there wouldn't have been a problem.
As you correctly pointed out, Saavik made it through just fine, even though she was half Romulan. The difference is, she (presumably) didn't try to hide it. That proves Starfleet doesn't care if a recruit has Romulan ancestry. They just have to tell the truth. As any decent officer would.
If Tarses was so scared about what Starfleet might think, that's his own damn problem.
Also, if you think there'd be no problem, I point out that his career is utterly ruined
Only because he lied on his application. Why should Starfleet trust anyone who does that, for whatever reason?
Again, he's been (falsely) arrested as a saboteur and traitor.
Starfleet is not bigoted.
The problem was NOT that Tarses' grandfather was Romulan. The problem was that Tarses LIED about it. He didn't have to do that. If he'd just come clean and admitted the truth from the get-go, there wouldn't have been a problem.
As you correctly pointed out, Saavik made it through just fine, even though she was half Romulan. The difference is, she (presumably) didn't try to hide it. That proves Starfleet doesn't care if a recruit has Romulan ancestry. They just have to tell the truth. As any decent officer would.
If Tarses was so scared about what Starfleet might think, that's his own damn problem.
I’m still confused with how it ended. Picard quotes some milquetoast legal bromide, the scenery-chewing lady has a tantrum and storms out...and we’re done.
And gosh, how much of a chump is Worf![]()
Considering Admiral Satie's attitude and in the TNG era Starfleet is a mainly human dominated club I would not trust the application board to leave their unconscious biases at home. (Or maybe they use AI to process the applications). In universe TOS and TNG Starfleet reeks of Terran privilege and so does its flagship.
This was a two-year old post. Forum rules are kinda averse to resurrecting dead threads. I’m going to leave it open though, your observation is good and might generate more good conversation.Am I the only one who was especially disturbed when Satie brought up Picard's assimilation? The man was violated...he was mentally raped and had his knowledge turned against the Federation in what was - up until that point - the biggest massacre in Federation history.
This was a two-year old post. Forum rules are kinda averse to resurrecting dead threads. I’m going to leave it open though, your observation is good and might generate more good conversation.
Nope, your logic is very sound and the "necrosis rule" really amounts to a suggestion. The intent is to prevent some clown from replying to a bunch of old threads with a couple of words or a smiley face to artificially build post count. The fact that your comment was very thoughtful made me leave the thread open.Apologies. I was searching for a discussion on The Drumhead, saw this thread and then noticed that it was on a good conversation track; I can abstain from further posting if necessary. Although, in fairness, the thread wasn't locked. If this is an issue, shouldn't threads automatically close after a set duration of inactivity? My philosophy is to continue sticking with a winner (and enriching it) instead of generating yet another thread, but if that clashes with protocol...no biggie.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.