FC was certainly not mediocre or forgettable. INS was more relevant to those who don't want action, NEM was more relevant to those who want action. The E looked great in all of them.Because the D is symbolic of one of the most popular and beloved skiffy TV shows of all time. The E is symbolic of three mediocre and mostly forgettable films from two decades ago.
Yes, it was good in the pilot and then just weird and boring in the rest of the show. Glad to see they made it more interesting again.Slight change of topic:
I absolutely love Burnhams new hairstyle!
It’s not a unique conceptHmm. Not only does season 3 appear to echo Andromeda, but the abandoned Star Trek: Federation as well.
Yeah, that had definitely stood out to me when the flag is dropped down. Though, I don't think the flag ever had all 150 stars on it, but it definitely has a different look. Be interesting to see what has happened.This YouTube Video points out something I hadn't thought about. The Federation flag only has six planets. It used to be 150. Not looking too good for the Federation (or rather what's left of it)... You can see this pointed out around the 5:00-mark.
I think the most stars we’ve seen on the flag is on the TNG version of it
My basic thought is:
When you take both of those together, the logical conclusion is the best future scenario is one where the Federation as a whole just ascended somewhere or left the galaxy en masse or something. That way we can imagine that the Federation culture as a whole got a "happy ending" (or rather a happy continuance into the future) while the crew has a series of crises in front of it. Not to mention a mystery to solve - what exactly happened to everyone. Maybe Earth is just plain gone, with the rest of the solar system there? Maybe there's a completely pristine Earth complete with woolly mammoths? Maybe they meet various "daughter cultures" (luddites, androids, holograms, uploaded deceased people) who got split off and help them put the pieces together? Lots of interesting possibilities.
- We want to have an optimisic scenario where the Federation "wins" - insofar as technological progress continues and its ideals endure.
- The needs of the show require that the Future Federation is absent as a major political force in order to give Discovery as a ship some relevance in the future.
The biggest thing about this though is it touches on the biggest mystery in all of Trek - where are the elder races? Intelligent life has been evolving for billions of years, and in the current era races are whipping around the galaxy by the thousands. This has never, however, produced some sort of lasting galactic-wide civilization. It doesn't even seem there are races which maintain themselves in technological form for millions - or even tens of thousands - of years. Virtually every race discovered is less advanced, or more or less the same in technological development - unless they're some wacko godlike energy beings.
Burnham says in the trailer she spent a year looking for a single event that led to this future but couldn't. It seems like there are a lot of factors leading to the Federation's decline, more than can be spotted by studying history.I suppose a galactic cataclysm could have reduce each spacfaring society back to the Stone age, in a figurative sense. Maybe few pockets of high tech still exist but not the infrastructure to support it?
The new flag has 2 big ones and 4 smaller ones instead of 3 big ones and countless little ones. I suspect it means one of the founding members of the Federation has left, I'm guessing Andoria since our heroes are being chased by Andorians at one point.What's fun is that the "original" flag had three prominent stars, and we never learned what those might stand for. Four founding members existed as the absolute minimum (because the list Daniels gives to Archer is four long, even if he edits it for brevity), not three. Are the stars there for the UFP Ideals, whatever those might be? Noninterference, Morality, Superior firepower?
Having six instead of three might be taken as a sign of growth, really. But of what? Of the number of members who actually matter? Of the number of catchphrases?
Timo Saloniemi
I want Michael to get the Dax symbiont, but since Michael is not a Trill the joining is not complete. So instead of a full joining of the minds, she hears (and sees) the Dax symbiont in her mind. And the Dax symbiont is played by Terry Farrell!I wonder if Burnham's floating in the symbiont breeding pool because she and/or the Trill theorize that it might let her see what the symbionts know, or because she will get temporarily joined to a suitably ancient one, Odan-style, to get an insight on what happened in the past [insert symbiont lifespan here] years. Way too fanwanky, but I'd kind of want it to be Dax (but then again, with all the Trill characters around, Dax is probably already joined if they've survived for that long).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.