• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Battlestar Galactica getting rebooted (again) for NBS's streaming service

That’s all ancient Jewish lore, way before the Christians existed.

The flood story was even older, from the Babylonians and Sumerians (amongst many others in ancient times with a flood myth in their texts). Don’t think there are any those guys left around to piss off. ;)
Don't nearly all major religions and mythologies mention a great flood in ancient times? I've often wondered if that could be a reference glaciers melting after the Ice Age?
 
Don't nearly all major religions and mythologies mention a great flood in ancient times? I've often wondered if that could be a reference glaciers melting after the Ice Age?
It was more likely a flood in the Nile region <--- As that's the area where the oldest myths/stories about "A Great Flood" have been found/traced to.
 
Don't nearly all major religions and mythologies mention a great flood in ancient times? I've often wondered if that could be a reference glaciers melting after the Ice Age?
That, or there’s also evidence of a massive asteroid strike in ancient times, the Younger Dryas Incident, about 12,000 years ago. It’s becoming a popular theory that this is a potential source for all the different flood myths.
 
So wait... Caprica was not originally a Ron Moore/David Icke thing? Or it was a new series of theirs that got repurposed into BSG?

I would have been up for seeing a completely new sci-fi series of theirs. But I never watched Caprica because I just couldn't visualize a place for it as BSG. I mean I have it (I think? I'd have to check) as part of my BSG Blu-Ray box set, and I still haven't gotten around to watching it. In theory I could pop it in at anytime.

And yeah, Blood and Chrome looked more interesting as a new BSG series. But I haven't watched it either. Something about knowing the movie was edited together from more of those damn webisodes, and that's how (the existing portion of) the show was made has turned me off. But it too sits on my shelf.

I think the thing to do (back to my spaceships and Cylons comment) would have been produce Blood and Chrome as the news BSG spinoff, and then find a way to integrate Caprica into that as backstory. Or otherwise as you say, produce Caprica as an entirely different thing.

With NBC-Universal driving the new show (and I don't know why I didn't consider that), I guess it makes sense they wouldn't want to reboot it. I just feel like they already tried spinning off BSG and they canceled it both times. What are the odds they would consider something like that earlier reboot they were producing for FOX? Probably none, in a world that's already seen Moore's version. Which again leaves me wishing Universal would just go back to pushing BSG as a film franchise, something that more easily COULD exist as a separate entity.

I also don't think CBS Trek is a good model for BSG to follow. Maybe that could change, if STP is a good enough show that CBS can now safely cancel STD without hurting the rest of their Trek machine. But also, BSG isn't ST. It's a show about deliverance and it has a very finite premise.

About the conception of the show, from Wikipedia:

During the second season of Battlestar Galactica, series developer Ronald D. Moore and production partner David Eick started speculating about the Battlestar Galactica universe prior to the Cylons. Unable to dedicate serious time to the notion, it remained in the concept stage of development until in early 2006, screenwriter Remi Aubuchon, unaware of the ideas about a Battlestar Galactica prequel, proposed a film about artificial intelligence to Universal Pictures.[14] Though Universal Pictures turned down the project as a movie, Universal Television executives felt Moore and Eick might be interested in Aubuchon's take on the subject and arranged a meeting. Merging the existing thoughts for a Battlestar Galactica prequel with those Aubuchon brought to the table, a general outline for a series emerged.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caprica
 
Last edited:
So wait... Caprica was not originally a Ron Moore/David Icke thing? Or it was a new series of theirs that got repurposed into BSG?

I would have been up for seeing a completely new sci-fi series of theirs. But I never watched Caprica because I just couldn't visualize a place for it as BSG. I mean I have it (I think? I'd have to check) as part of my BSG Blu-Ray box set, and I still haven't gotten around to watching it. In theory I could pop it in at anytime.

And yeah, Blood and Chrome looked more interesting as a new BSG series. But I haven't watched it either. Something about knowing the movie was edited together from more of those damn webisodes, and that's how (the existing portion of) the show was made has turned me off. But it too sits on my shelf.

I think the thing to do (back to my spaceships and Cylons comment) would have been produce Blood and Chrome as the news BSG spinoff, and then find a way to integrate Caprica into that as backstory. Or otherwise as you say, produce Caprica as an entirely different thing.

With NBC-Universal driving the new show (and I don't know why I didn't consider that), I guess it makes sense they wouldn't want to reboot it. I just feel like they already tried spinning off BSG and they canceled it both times. What are the odds they would consider something like that earlier reboot they were producing for FOX? Probably none, in a world that's already seen Moore's version. Which again leaves me wishing Universal would just go back to pushing BSG as a film franchise, something that more easily COULD exist as a separate entity.

I also don't think CBS Trek is a good model for BSG to follow. Maybe that could change, if STP is a good enough show that CBS can now safely cancel STD without hurting the rest of their Trek machine. But also, BSG isn't ST. It's a show about deliverance and it has a very finite premise.

I enjoyed Blood and Chrome for what it was. As a webseries I thought the FX were better than they could've been, but if it had been a television series I would've liked them to touch up the FX. I also felt being a webseries constricted the show's character development, but for the most part I thought the casting was fine. I had my quibbles that they didn't get the guy who played Young Adama from "Razor" back, but the actor they did get wasn't bad, and I think he played a less seasoned Colonial warrior in a way the "Razor" guy perhaps couldn't, because he came across as more grizzled.

I would like to see a BSG film franchise. The scope of the original series fits a theatrical treatment, and if I recall, the pilot did get a theatrical release. I would love to see a new spin on the material, though at the same time I would love to see whoever from the original series who wanted to come back, to have a role in it.

Don't know if you are familiar with Tom DeSanto's and Bryan Singer's BSG series. Granted, Singer's involvement today would be very problematic but I do think they were on to something back then.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Richard Hatch also shot "Second Coming" as a revival attempt. I wouldn't mind seeing his vision realized, albeit sadly without him, but it could be a fitting tribute.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
]I'm not really excited about another BSG spinoff either. Too soon? No, it's too late to do another Caprica or something else based on a show that ended ten years ago. Besides, I think what audiences mostly want from a Battlestar Galactica series is spaceships and Cylons.
What makes you think this won't involve Cylons or spaceships? I haven't see any kind of plot details yet.
Which is why Caprica never made sense to me.
Caprica did involve the Cylons, the show was all about how they started. There were some spaceships towards the end too, and I have a feeling if it had been able to continue we probably would have seen more.
I mean I suppose they could flesh out the backstory of Kobal and the Final Five and all that, but honestly most of that stuff already didn't make sense in the series.
I'm thinking it's probably going to be something more directly tied to the events of the RDM series.


This feels like a desperate move on the part of See-Fee Channel (I'm pronouncing it in the ridiculous way that it's spelled) to replay one of their greatest hits.
This has nothing to do with Syfy, it's being produced for Peacock, the NBCU-Universal streaming service.

I also don't think CBS Trek is a good model for BSG to follow. Maybe that could change, if STP is a good enough show that CBS can now safely cancel STD without hurting the rest of their Trek machine.
Why would they cancel Discovery? As far as I know it's been a big hit. It inspired them to do thee or four more Star Trek series, so it can't be doing to badly for them.
 
Maybe that could change, if STP is a good enough show that CBS can now safely cancel STD without hurting the rest of their Trek machine.
:wtf:

Why would you want the cancellation of DSC? Clearly you don’t like it (fair enough) but others do (you’re only getting PIC BECAUSE of DSC, not in spite of it). I’ve never understood why someone would wish for a show to be canceled (unless they hold stock in a company losing money on the venture). People’s livelihoods, other people’s enjoyment, these should be sacrificed for you?

There is another solution. I know it might seem radical but it’s worth trying as an alternative (one that has no negative impact on others at that). Don’t. Watch. The. Show. It’s just that simple.
 
So, I recently finished the BSG reboot for the first time after all these years. I'll assume that at this late date spoiler tags aren't necessary.

The only question I have is, what happened to Adama's Raptor? Were there other planes that weren't flown into the sun? It wasn't onscreen, I don't think, but the NatGeo in the RDM shot mentioned them finding it.

Anyway, it was good. RDM and company did a good job.

Back on topic, I'm curious to see what they do with the new thing. I like this universe.
 
You've finished all the movies and (the tv show) Caprica?

Imagine people in the future, who START NuBSG by watching Caprica.

Have mercy.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

And Razor, and The Plan. :p
 
Last edited:
I'm not really excited about another BSG spinoff either. Too soon? No, it's too late to do another Caprica or something else based on a show that ended ten years ago.
If any franchise has proven to be immune from the passage of time, it's BSG (and of course Trek). It took me a while to get in to Caprica but once I did I loved the show.

NuBSG did seem to have a definitive end to it, but why can't BSG do what Trek did with TNG? There were plenty of fans who complained that we don't need a reboot of the BSG 70's show. But we ended up getting something great.

I'm not advocating for a reboot of '04 BSG, but I see no reason why another BSG spinoff or maybe even a reboot of Caprica would have to necessarily be bad. Sam Esmail is at least as good a storyteller as RDM, and truth be told, better. The fact that this guy wants the BSG franchise makes me kinda tingly inside.

The idea of a show may sound like something you don't need, but that has no bearing on how good (or bad) the actual show might be.
 
Last edited:
:wtf:

Why would you want the cancellation of DSC? Clearly you don’t like it (fair enough) but others do (you’re only getting PIC BECAUSE of DSC, not in spite of it). I’ve never understood why someone would wish for a show to be canceled (unless they hold stock in a company losing money on the venture). People’s livelihoods, other people’s enjoyment, these should be sacrificed for you?

There is another solution. I know it might seem radical but it’s worth trying as an alternative (one that has no negative impact on others at that). Don’t. Watch. The. Show. It’s just that simple.
I'm not an STD hater. In fact I defended the show after it's first season. After the end of S2 I'm just no longer that invested in seeing it try to salvage itself. And I assume it's being kept alive because the CBS Trek franchise cannot afford to be seen having canceled it at this time.

Either way, CBS Trek in it's current form (STD, since nothing else has been seen yet) is not something NBC-Universal should necessarily be looking at and saying "My god, we need to be doing that."
 
theenglish said:
When you say Earth 2.0, you are talking about our Earth right? Some remains or evidence of the BSG crew is discovered after having survived 150k years?
The Earth 2.0 I'm referring to is "our" earth. I'm not sure what they could find for clues that would reveal the "true" history about the cycle with Kobol, Cylons, the colonies, etc. maybe something left out in space? Like if Anders left a black box on the moon.
 
What makes you think this won't involve Cylons or spaceships? I haven't see any kind of plot details yet.
The main Galactica story has been told. Other than the 1st Cylon war, I'm not seeing what else is left within that continuity other than the possibility of more obscure stuff like Caprica. What else has been tossed around in this thread? A Lords of Kobal series? Audiences are supposed to know what that is and be interested in it?

Caprica did involve the Cylons, the show was all about how they started. There were some spaceships towards the end too, and I have a feeling if it had been able to continue we probably would have seen more.
Did it have spaceships flown by people being chased to extinction by Cylons (ie, what people remember from the original BSG)?

Caprica got canceled after just one season, hot off the success of the rebooted BSG. Clearly I'm not the only BSG fan who didn't tune in because I didn't see potential for what they were doing.

I'm thinking it's probably going to be something more directly tied to the events of the RDM series.
They probably won't have the original actors, since anybody they could get will be ten years older. That will make their options more constricting the closer they try to get to BSG actual.

This has nothing to do with Syfy, it's being produced for Peacock, the NBCU-Universal streaming service.
I stand corrected. The first link I followed to news of this series was from the See-Fee Channel site. I don't know why I thought they were involved in it. I don't see the difference though if it's NBC thinking they can make a third attempted spin-off after ten years.

Why would they cancel Discovery? As far as I know it's been a big hit. It inspired them to do thee or four more Star Trek series, so it can't be doing to badly for them.
Only CBS knows how it's doing. But they started planning all these spin-offs prior to working the bugs out of STD. And after two seasons STD is still an incoherent mess (more than it was after 1st season in fact). And until STP begins airing it remains the only thing CBS Trek has to show for itself. And isn't it supposed to be the most expensive TV show ever made?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top