I love the version you picked and the tweaks you've done with it. It looks great.
I think all of them look good, but I can't help feeling that what they would've actually done is have the roll bar and struts be two separate pieces. The roll bar struts ending further in, with the warp struts just jutting from the bottom of the hull at an outward angle evoking the Enterprise. The Miranda is definitely an 80's design. That's my two cents. I'm sure whatever you end up with will be fantastic as usual.![]()
It was a collaboration between Minor, Jennings, and Cole. And yes, it probably had more canon variations than any other starship, what with the Soyuz class and the variations on the roll-bar. From Memory Alpha: "There were five different known hull configurations utilized with the Miranda-class during its time in service."I really love the leading edge trim.
Mike Minor (this was his, right?) really struck gold with this design. I swear we've seen more variations of this ship than the Enterprise.
It was a collaboration between Minor, Jennings, and Cole. And yes, it probably had more canon variations than any other starship, what with the Soyuz class and the variations on the roll-bar. From Memory Alpha: "There were five different known hull configurations utilized with the Miranda-class during its time in service."
The team accomplished the goal of having it look like it belonged to the same fleet as Enterprise, but different enough to be able to quickly tell the difference between the two ships on-screen. It also set the precedent that all Starfleet ships of the line all shared the saucer/nacelle combo going forward in the series.
Note: Reading up about the design of the ship, the roll bar was more of an afterthought, added only after Bennet signed off on the ship upside down accidentally. Since they now had to flip their original design, the roll bar was added to help balance it out.
I always believed that the Miranda came from the Enterprise Refit as the "New Heavy Cruiser" (to borrow a term from SFB) to replace the constitutions of yesteryear.
Does it have 14 science labs? The space for that extra hangar has to come from somewhere. One possibility is that the Miranda class was a response to V'ger (assuming of course that it didn't exist beforehand). A high speed threat came screaming in and caught SF flatfooted and Miranda was the answer. A simpler design to build providing an intercept capability. By the time of the whale probe, SF had vessels in place to intercept such a threat and even though they were ineffectual, they were there.You know, I've thought about this as well. Studying some fan-made deck plans of the Miranda, it's apparent that the Miranda has close to just as much (if not more?) interior space as a Constitution. That combined primary hull/secondary hull really maximizes space much more efficiently. Also, other than an apparent deflector, the Miranda has everything a Constitution has and more. It's got an additional (aft) torpedo launcher, an additional hangar bay, and the two "pulse phasers" on the ends of the roll bar. Which is the better class?
You know, I've thought about this as well. The MIranda is always considered a lesser class than the Constitution, but after studying some fan-made deck plans of the Miranda, it's apparent that the Miranda has close to just as much (if not more?) interior space as a Constitution. That combined primary hull/secondary hull really maximizes space much more efficiently. Also, other than an apparent deflector, the Miranda has everything a Constitution has and more. It's got an additional (aft) torpedo launcher, an additional hangar bay, and the two "pulse phasers" on the ends of the roll bar. Which is the better class?
That's a good idea, but I meant to say earlier I've actually gone back and reduced the number of my Ptolemy class from NCC-38xx to a base NCC-8xx, for the very reason that it seemed rather high given the Connie's NCC-17xx and the Excelsior's NX-2000. But then again, the Constellation as a NCC-10xx number, so who knows how all that really works.It's also my headcanon that TOS ships regularly went into the 2XXX and 3XXX numbers for ships built around the 60's (as you did here with the Ptolemy);
That's an interesting idea!Yeah, I always thought along the same lines, the Miranda is more compact, but not really less well equipped, at least from a tactical perspective (which I always found a bit at odds with the Reliant's mission at the start of TWoK), just visibly you can see it's clearly better armed than the Constitution.
Ironically I always though the fan-made "Avenger-Class" name fits in better due to the amount of weaponry it has. IMO "Miranda" is just the base class, while the sub-class with the rollbar is indeed called Avenger-type or something like that.
The Superbird was the first car to be designed using a wind tunnel iirc, so in this case I suspect it was the first to have one. Or at least the first car anyone knew about. In many cases, these things became decorative add ons later, without aerodynamic purpose. But on the Superbird, it actually functioned to hold the back end down.
You know, I've thought about this as well. The MIranda is always considered a lesser class than the Constitution, but after studying some fan-made deck plans of the Miranda, it's apparent that the Miranda has close to just as much (if not more?) interior space as a Constitution. That combined primary hull/secondary hull really maximizes space much more efficiently. Also, other than an apparent deflector, the Miranda has everything a Constitution has and more. It's got an additional (aft) torpedo launcher, an additional hangar bay, and the two "pulse phasers" on the ends of the roll bar. Which is the better class?
Reading up about the design of the ship, the roll bar was more of an afterthought, added only after Bennet signed off on the ship upside down accidentally.
Anyone ever modeled the original right-side up Reliant? Lots of copies of the schematics floating around, but I've never seen anyone attempt a 3D model of it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.