It does make me wonder if Cameron will ever actually complete his Avatar sequels. I’d be perfectly okay if he didn’t.
But excited it’s not too long a long time before we return to the galaxy far, far away on the big screen.
I don't think those movies are going to happen. I think they are stringing him along because they don't want to look like they fired him out of fan pressure or it makes them look bad by firing yet another director creating more drama. If Knives Out makes money they can justify keeping him. If not then they hire their first female director. JasonRian Johnson has talked a little bit about what he has planned for his movies, without going into any specifics.
I'm very, very curious to see what his and the Game of Thrones guys movies are going to be like. It sounds like they are going to have no real connections to the Skywalker Saga, so it should it be interesting to see what we get when these guys are able to start with a more or less blank slate.
I guess I'm behind on my internet lingo, because I didn't understand about 2/3s of this sentence.Cameron would roflstomp roundhead if he goes h2h with him and his star wars trilogy.
Yeah, the idea that a Hollywood company would string along (i.e. lead along with no intention of working with them) strikes me as odd. Directors are generally a hot commodity, and Johnson certainly is a sought after director, regardless of his reputation in the SW community.I really can't see making all of the announcements about Johnson's movies if they just plan on firing him. They've been pretty quick to fire directors they aren't happy with, so if they didn't want to work with Rian Johnson anymore they would have fired him by now.
I guess I'm behind on my internet lingo, because I didn't understand about 2/3s of this sentence.
Except the decision to remove Colin Trevorrow and bring Abrams in on Episode IX was made in September 2017. At the time, TLJ had not been released yet, meaning SW fandom hadn't started hating Rian Johnson, James Mangold and the proposed Boba Fett film he was supposed to direct had not been announced yet, and Solo was only a troubled production due to Lord Miller's firing. The movie itself was still eight months away from release and was therefore not yet a "failure."I think it has to do with Lord and Miller and even James Mangold and the failure of Solo. They look like they are in disarray. A big reason they brought Abrams back over Johnson.
I do think the idea of him doing the trilogy was legit and my timing might be off but I feel at some point it went from sure thing to wait and see. Now if his Knives movie is wee received then it is easier bring him back. No doubt with a script and eveything all set because has been working on it with the hopes it will be made. It is weird though the Game of Thrones guys might get a movie as well so it could come down to them vs Johnson with the loser leaving the franchise. Plus at some point they are going to want their first female director so someone is going to be squessed out if you are doing just one movie ever two years. JasonExcept the decision to remove Colin Trevorrow and bring Abrams in on Episode IX was made in September 2017. At the time, TLJ had not been released yet, meaning SW fandom hadn't started hating Rian Johnson, James Mangold and the proposed Boba Fett film he was supposed to direct had not been announced yet, and Solo was only a troubled production due to Lord Miller's firing. The movie itself was still eight months away from release and was therefore not yet a "failure."
If there was any chance of Johnson's trilogy being abandoned, it would have been done so within the past year. There's no way he'd still be talking about it if the franchise's troubles in 2018 in any way endangered the trilogy.
Except, it would still be a poor business decision on Disney and LFL's part to string along a director.I think it has to do with Lord and Miller and even James Mangold and the failure of Solo. They look like they are in disarray. A big reason they brought Abrams back over Johnson. Jason
It's not ideal and I assume they would soft pedal it and call it a seperation of creative differences but they have already had their share of director drama. Even ignoring the SW ones they did publicly throw James Gunn under the bus and then they pushed out Whedon and Edgar Wright and who knows will be screwed over now that it looks like lied about their Fox merger. Just something to get their IP's and shut down the adult stuff which many though would stay around under the FOX label. JasonExcept, it would still be a poor business decision on Disney and LFL's part to string along a director.
Iger and Kennedy have certainly have their work cut out to improve public perception of Star Wars handling, but that doesn't mean that they would commit a huge faux pau of basically lying to a director.
Indeed. If there were any chance of Johnson being fired and his trilogy being abandoned, it would already have happened. Studios don't "string along" directors when they have no intention of working with them.Except, it would still be a poor business decision on Disney and LFL's part to string along a director.
It makes for poor business relationships. Disney can't afford such poor relationships. Hollywood is a small town and stringing a director along would get around very quickly.It's not ideal and I assume they would soft pedal it and call it a seperation of creative differences but they have already had their share of director drama. Even ignoring the SW ones they did publicly throw James Gunn under the bus and then they pushed out Whedon and Edgar Wright and who knows will be screwed over now that it looks like lied about their Fox merger. Just something to get their IP's and shut down the adult stuff which many though would stay around under the FOX label. Jason
No. That's not how the industry works.I don't think those movies are going to happen. I think they are stringing him along because they don't want to look like they fired him out of fan pressure or it makes them look bad by firing yet another director creating more drama. If Knives Out makes money they can justify keeping him. If not then they hire their first female director. Jason
It's not ideal and I assume they would soft pedal it and call it a seperation of creative differences but they have already had their share of director drama. Even ignoring the SW ones they did publicly throw James Gunn under the bus and then they pushed out Whedon and Edgar Wright and who knows will be screwed over now that it looks like lied about their Fox merger. Just something to get their IP's and shut down the adult stuff which many though would stay around under the FOX label. Jason
Yeah, the idea that a Hollywood company would string along (i.e. lead along with no intention of working with them) strikes me as odd. Directors are generally a hot commodity, and Johnson certainly is a sought after director, regardless of his reputation in the SW community.
LFL leading him along strikes me as a very poor business decision, because why would someone work with a company who toys with its employees.
Huh? Where does all this come from? I haven't heard anything even close to any of this, and I've been following most of the news on this front coming out of the legitamate news sources like EW, IGN, Io9 and Tor.com. Ok those last two aren't completely trust worthy, but they're still better than taking some rando on Twitter or Youtube's word as absolute truth.who knows will be screwed over now that it looks like lied about their Fox merger. Just something to get their IP's and shut down the adult stuff which many though would stay around under the FOX label. Jason
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.