Once that happens, we will definitively say that the original assertion is not true, because the only way to prove something definitively is via YouTube video.Someone needs to challenge them to a debate, film it, and DESTROY them on youtube.![]()
Once that happens, we will definitively say that the original assertion is not true, because the only way to prove something definitively is via YouTube video.
Well, you could "clap back" on Facebook...Exactly. There's nowhere to go after someone DESTROYS you on youtube.![]()
I saw a post in Facebook star trek group discussing this.
They said that Kurtzman and Johnson created the best versions of Trek and Wars and referred to Gene "Rotten berry" and George "Doofus" as overrated.
Well, you could "clap back" on Facebook...
Nope.Are Rian Johnson and Alex Kurtzman the fathers of modern science fiction?
Shall we take this thread into a serious direction and discuss who IS the father of modern science fiction? Or shall we keep making fun of social media.Nope.
Next?
What if we limit to science fiction movies?Why are we limiting "Science Fiction" to Star Trek and Star Wars?
I'd think Kevin Feige might have a better claim.What if we limit to science fiction movies?
I think we can talk about what modern means in this context after we decide what science fiction is. For example if you exclude superheroes, do you also exclude guardians of the galaxy? If so, do you also exclude star wars?Another point I forgot to mention in my other post is, what exactly would be the definition of modern? How far back we go before it isn't modern? 1950s? '60s? 1800s? 2000?
Nope.I saw a post in Facebook star trek group discussing this.
They said that Kurtzman and Johnson created the best versions of Trek and Wars and referred to Gene "Rotten berry" and George "Doofus" as overrated.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.