I was going to go with Byte.
With engineer Welsh and Dr. Hatfield?
Perhaps, as a nod to fandom, he should say that in one of the post series big budget movies.Fun fact:
Contrary to popular belief, Captain Perk never actually said "Stream me up, Welshy."
Somehow, I get the feeling that that won’t happen.Perhaps, as a nod to fandom, he should say that in one of the post series big budget movies.
That requires self reflection and stepping outside of one's own position... Infinity is a long wait. But I have hope one day, you will discover it. Maybe.. But narcasism and self righteousness is hard to over come. Objective views are even harder to come to when there's a specific ideology one has adopted.it excludes the possibility that you could be wrong..to see another view point. As stated. Infinity is a long time to wait. Good luck.Still waiting to discover my "obvious hidden agenda".![]()
You've refused to discuss the actual topic and have resorted to personal remarks after being told to stop. Infraction for flaming. Comments to PM. And you have been reply banned from this thread.That requires self reflection and stepping outside of one's own position... Infinity is a long wait. But I have hope one day, you will discover it. Maybe.. But narcasism and self righteousness is hard to over come. Objective views are even harder to come to when there's a specific ideology one has adopted.it excludes the possibility that you could be wrong..to see another view point. As stated. Infinity is a long time to wait. Good luck.
While I think the case has no real merit, it’s a bit cruel to the guy to have him twist in the wind like this.I know the judge can take all the time she wants to rule but I’m kinda surprised it’s taking this long.
While I think the case has no real merit, it’s a bit cruel to the guy to have him twist in the wind like this.
This is true. I was listening to a radio interview with a lawyer who stated that if he had not pushed forward on a criminal case three times it would not have been prosecuted, just due to the sheer amount of time and effort it takes.Even in cases that are way more clear cut or justified, it takes years and years until anyone sees any results. Life's not like a court show where after one session there's a clear cut verdict. Court cases wear people down, especially the uncertainty during the whole time.
Court cases take fooooreeeeeeeeeveer.
That's why "stalling" is such a great strategy for people with money. Most people simply can't afford it. (That's not a comment on this particular court case, more like how the court system is way overworked as a whole).
Even in cases that are way more clear cut or justified, it takes years and years until anyone sees any results. Life's not like a court show where after one session there's a clear cut verdict. Court cases wear people down, especially the uncertainty during the whole time.
WRT Criminal cases, no. They are done as expeditiously as possible because often you are dealing with someone sitting in jail/prison. They are MANDATED to be heard in a certain amount of days. If it's a capital case (IE manslaughter/murder); yes, the defense may agree to an extension because they need time to look over the evidence to formulate a defense.Pretty much. Especially in criminal cases, but also in plenty of civil cases too.
WRT Criminal cases, no. They are done as expeditiously as possible because often you are dealing with someone sitting in jail/prison. They are MANDATED to be heard in a certain amount of days. If it's a capital case (IE manslaughter/murder); yes, the defense may agree to an extension because they need time to look over the evidence to formulate a defense.
Civil cases (involving money) take forever because there is no incarceration involved, plus the 'losing' side can continue to appeal the decision all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court (and if they decline to hear the case then the last highest appeals court ruling stands.)
As for this case, I'm sure CBS is content to wait it out and the ball' in the Plaintiff's court (no pun intended) as the Judge set out a clear description of what she needed for the discovery portion to move forward; and set a date (which the Plaintiff has already missed). That said, she may be waiting to see just what (if any) further hard evidence (if any) the Plaintiff brings to the table; but unless it's an absolute 'smoking gun'/'bombshell' - at the point they do, CBS will raise the objection that the Plaintiff missed the Judge's date - and the Judge will ultimately rule.
And if you wonder why she's doing it this way, it's to head off any claim on appeal that the Plaintiffs weren't given enough time. The record would show she in effect gave them time, and they came up with nothing further to present.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.