• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

If Data couldn't feel emotions, was he truly conscious?

"It sits there looking at me, and I don't know what it is. This case has dealt with metaphysics, with questions best left to saints and philosophers. I am neither competent, nor qualified, to answer those. I've got to make a ruling – to try to speak to the future. Is Data a machine? Yes. Is he the property of Starfleet? No. We've all been dancing around the basic issue: does Data have a soul? I don't know that he has. I don't know that I have! But I have got to give him the freedom to explore that question himself. It is the ruling of this court that Lieutenant Commander Data has the freedom to choose."
But he could be a water buffalo with that description, or a bear or possum.....:)
 
What about people with various mental issues? As above sociopath, Aitism, sever mental retardation, altzheimers, altered states of consciousness, coma or vegitarian state. Are these people "less" than others?:sigh:.

I don't know what you're referring to. I never said anything about "more" or "less". I don't remember someone speaking in terms of someone being more or less than someone else. Could you clarify?
 
Human emotions serve some social or biological purpose necessary to survival and procreation. I can buy data being conscious, self aware, but why he would feel anything that we do. What need has he got for disgust? Lust?
 
There may be entire alien civilizations that do not experience what we would define as emotion.

Kor

I doubt that. Emotions play a role in our survival. Without emotions, a remote (would be) ancestor of ours wouldn't have done enough to stay alive and pass on his genes to the next generation. Funnily enough that's even a star trek line! In Star Trek Beyond McCoy's says "Fear of death is what keeps us alive." He couldn't be more right.
 
I doubt that. Emotions play a role in our survival. Without emotions, a remote (would be) ancestor of ours wouldn't have done enough to stay alive and pass on his genes to the next generation. Funnily enough that's even a star trek line! In Star Trek Beyond McCoy's says "Fear of death is what keeps us alive." He couldn't be more right.
I'm sure plenty of literary science fiction has already dealt with such a possibility. But Star Trek continually fails to give us aliens that are truly *alien* and instead are just caricatures of human traits.

Kor
 
I always felt that Data had basic emotions...he displays feelings like all the time, computational reactions to external input, but he had no software to understand those reactions in an emotional human context. He understood what comedy was and could process that funny things are happening, but did not have the software capability to react to it appropriately, or properly generate actions with the intent of being humorous.

Obligatory, but in the end...are any of us conscious?
 
I don't know what you're referring to. I never said anything about "more" or "less". I don't remember someone speaking in terms of someone being more or less than someone else. Could you clarify?
Are they less conscious people because of their altered cognitive 'ability'?
 
Well, it sort of goes without saying, I'd say. The less cognizant you are, the less conscious you'll be.
So Data was conscious.
Cats, dogs, snakes, lizards, my bad.
I thought the issue was a conscious, as in a soul.
Cognizant of life and feeling empathy that sort of thing.
Well, nevermind then.
 
So Data was conscious.
Cats, dogs, snakes, lizards, my bad.
I thought the issue was a conscious, as in a soul.
Cognizant of life and feeling empathy that sort of thing.
Well, nevermind then.

Except that it doesn't work for Data, because Data is not affiliated to the animal kingdom in any way. Cats, dogs, snakes, lizards, share ancestors with us. A large part of their DNA is identical to ours. Data is nothing like us, so if he's conscient it would be in spite of his maker, which is so improbable that it may as well be impossible.
 
I'm sure plenty of literary science fiction has already dealt with such a possibility. But Star Trek continually fails to give us aliens that are truly *alien* and instead are just caricatures of human traits.

Kor
I think that's always been intentional though. The aliens are used to represent some human facet or attribute, as opposed to something like Star Wars, where the aliens are just supposed to be as weird as possible(generally) .
 
I'm sure plenty of literary science fiction has already dealt with such a possibility. But Star Trek continually fails to give us aliens that are truly *alien* and instead are just caricatures of human traits.

That's might be because so many races were seeded by the Progenitors "TNG The Chase".
 
Was that revenge, or just logic? Knowing Fajo would go on to kill others if he wasn't stopped?

I feel it was revenge. If it was just plain logic why did he lie about the phaser at the end of the episode? He felt revenge and that's a pretty raw basic emotion.
 
I feel it was revenge. If it was just plain logic why did he lie about the phaser at the end of the episode? He felt revenge and that's a pretty raw basic emotion.

It doesn't make sense for Data to exact revenge at all, it would go against his ethical program. The most believable explanation IMO is that Data thought that it was the only way that he could prevent Fajo to kill more people in the Future. So he was acting in a sort of vicarious self-defense situation.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top