Troi doubled as an early warning detection system, though not very precise. And her empathic ability could sense a rising crew mutiny so Picard could put it down quickly. Not a bad crew member to have around.
it's really not a common misconception at all, because "mission specialist's chair" isn't really a common concept.Actually, a common misconception is that the third chair isn't really a "counselor's chair" but rather a mission specialist's chair.
Modern-day ships do just fine without having a psychiatrist on the bridge all the time analyzing everyone.
Thinking things over, a major issue with Deanna being on the bridge so often is that as the Enterprise's senior therapist, shouldn't she be you know, doing her job of having counselling sessions with the crew? I mean that and the paperwork associated with it should be enough to keep her busy, and that's before you factor in other stuff that falls to her, like helping Riker with the crew evaluations and so on. And while an argument can be made for having her on the bridge during a situation involving discussions, there really is no need for her to be on the bridge during routine matters, especially not when the ship is just travelling at warp or is in planetary orbit.
It never got cleared up what her prime function was, anyway. Was her first responsibility to be a counselor to whomever was in command, and who also provided some therapy and helped Riker with crew evaluations as a secondary function, or was it the other way around ?
Spock should never have been XO and Science officer, it was just to give Nimoy more to do.Have Riker or Troi drive the ship like how Spock was the science officer and xo and have the other stand next to Picard (ala Dr. McCoy) when necessary.
I don't think Starfleet would consider it ethical to have a full telepath invasively probing people's thoughts without their consent, whereas with an empath like Troi, it's more like she's reading an emotional "aura" that's emanating from someone.Deanna must have come with some very high qualifications and recommendations. I mean if you want to exploit the Betazoid gift for those kind of functions, why not go with a full telepath? Full telepathy would be immensely more useful ("he's planning to meet with an operative of the Romulans on the second moon of Eminiar 4 in 7 days to sell them our current troop dispositions, Captain") than just empathy ("I think he is holding back something, Captain").
So because her empathic gifts aren't all that, she must really excel in other areas of her job.
Which they weren't for the majority of the show's run....Other than her and the ship's XO being an item?
Well, Wesley wasn't just a civilian for very long. He became an Acting Ensign in what, the fourth episode? How many times did he visit the bridge before that, twice?And if Picard is kind enough to let the underage civilian Wes Crusher visit the bridge, he's not likely to say no to Troi, either.
I've long thought that the introduction of Guinan cut the character of Troi off at the knees. Let's face it, the bartender gave much better advice than Troi's typical "I'm okay, you're okay" pablum. Guinan could give tough love where it was needed, and even had a stronger bond with the Captain than Troi did. When you factor in that she was played by the already-famous Whoopi Goldberg (Who won an Oscar during the show's run) and the intrigue of her mysterious background, it's not much of a contest.I forgot about Guinan. They should have had a rivalry episode, where Troi's patients all start cancelling their appointments, and then Troi finds out they've been going to talk to Guinan. Now that would have made for a funny episode.
Why not, you don't stop your ears from operating when people are talking. Telepathy is as normal to telepaths as speaking and listening in audio is as normal to nontelepathsI don't think Starfleet would consider it ethical to have a full telepath invasively probing people's thoughts without their consent, whereas with an empath like Troi, it's more like she's reading an emotional "aura" that's emanating from someone.
Kor
I think in a lot of cases, it's been shown that telepaths have to "tune in" or focus on a particular person to be able to read their intimate thoughts. It's like seeing a book's cover vs. opening the book and reading it.Why not, you don't stop your ears from operating when people are talking. Telepathy is as normal to telepaths as speaking and listening in audio is as normal to nontelepaths
Not sure if it was that clear. With Lwaxanna Troi she seems to hear thoughts like one hears voices when people speak. Maybe there are degrees of telepathic ability?I think in a lot of cases, it's been shown that telepaths have to "tune in" or focus on a particular person to be able to read their intimate thoughts. It's like seeing a book's cover vs. opening the book and reading it.
Kor
I don't think Starfleet would consider it ethical to have a full telepath invasively probing people's thoughts without their consent, whereas with an empath like Troi, it's more like she's reading an emotional "aura" that's emanating from someone.
Kor
Yeah, I was thinking along those lines. Such conundrums would probably best be addressed by actual telepathic societies who have had centuries to iron these matters out.I agree that there's something to that; but where exactly would Starfleet draw the dividing line? Would "passive" telepathy be OK ? (A Deanna-style telepath that wouldn't actively try to "penetrate" someones defenses but still pick up thoughts that are "emitted" ?)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.