• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Drop the S31 show for a Captain Pike show?

Drop the Section 31 show for a the Pike show?

  • Yes, I want a Pike show, and do not want a Section 31 show.

    Votes: 124 55.9%
  • No, I want a Section 31 show, and do not want a show with Pike.

    Votes: 9 4.1%
  • I want a show that feature both Pike and crew on the Enterprise and Section 31 with Georgiou.

    Votes: 23 10.4%
  • I trust CBS to give me something I will like!

    Votes: 12 5.4%
  • I want to see both! as separate shows.

    Votes: 54 24.3%

  • Total voters
    222
So, yes, such things are part of "the human adventure," which is supposed to be what Star Trek is all about.

Meh. The operative phrase was "human experience" and the suggestion that wallowing in a particular kind of fantasy is particularly illuminating about our lives and nature. Which, of course, it is not - this is all commercial, popular mass entertainment and as such defaults to one kind or another of gentle, reassuring myths about who and what we are. If grim, dark melodrama were in fact anything other than somehow fundamentally reassuring to folks who like it, there would be no real market for it.

As far as such fantasies go, the folks running Trek have never demonstrated the ability - nor been given the leeway by their employers* - to do the kind of stuff that Section 31 represents with nearly the skill or elan that shows like GoT or Westworld do, so what's the point in pissing away that money on imitating the work of their betters? It's like "dining" at MickeyD's.

*Yes, yes, DS9 - zzzzzzz.
 
Exactly. Kirk drinks coffee, eats chicken sandwiches, grumbles about doctor appointments, argues with bureaucrats, has awkward encounters with old girlfriends, and, yes, sometimes has to deal with cynicism and realpolitik--even when dealing with giant space amoebas, silicon-based lifeforms, and insane computers.

It's the realistic touches that keep classic Trek semi-believable and easy to identity with. And as for taking inspiration from things that happened in real life . . . God forbid that Trek should, say, base an episode on Viet Nam or the Pueblo Incident. :)

Here is the thing though: While I completely agree with your post, the context in which you set it is 100% wrong.

Having a genocidal mass murderer be the head of a gouvernment sanctioned black ops organization is NOT in ANY way "realism" or "inspiration from real life".

In fact, this is such a stupid cartoonishly evil act - it's LESS realistic than TNG's "evolutionary enlightnened humans". TNG's humans is straight up scientific gritty realism comüpared to fantasy shit like this. Shit like this has NEVER, EVER happened in real life, or would happen, or has ANY kind of real-world relevance to ever talk about.

This is not a commentary on "operation paperclip", or McCarthy'sim, or has really ANYTHING to do with real life. The only real-life example that would come close is what the Allied did to the Nazis. And yeah, they didn't give Hitler the CIA afterwards. And that guy wasn't even a cannibal. This is just straight up stupid.
 
I had this conversation with a relative the other day who didnt really understand just how bad it could have been, thats not to say it wasnt plenty bad enough of course.

The bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima killed approx 50000 in each city (rough estimates from the time).

If the Allies had been forced to invade mainland Japan the death toll would have been in the millions and Japan would have needed a century to recover rather than decades.

Dont forget the Japanese Military had told its civilian population that the Americans were coming to rape and murder them, many believed them and threw themselves off cliffs or took poison.

The fact the first bomb didnt work shows that only a strike on a big city was going to work, even then it took two hits as the Military didnt believe the Americans had done it at first and it took a second strike to really make the Military throw in the towel (barely), even so it was a very close vote in cabinet at the time as the Military still wanted to continue the fight, if I remember correctly one of the Generals committed ritual suicide right there and then when he was ordered to surrender.

That would have been a problem as the Americans only had the two bombs ready and could not have repeated the operation a third time.

Think about it like this, the Americans could have dropped the bombs on Tokyo (pop over 3m in 1940) and Osaka (pop over 1m in 1940) if they had wanted to but instead they hit Nagasaki and Hiroshima due to them both being major manufacturing hubs.

It could have been so much worse with the possibility that the Japanese could have decided to carry on with the war anyway, if so I have no doubt the total dead would have been many millions.

Off-topic, but of course there were better choices. There is no reason, for example, why they didn't drop the first bomb on un-inhabited area, with the specific statement - the next one's gonna' hit you hard. As it was, it was banking on "we have this bomb, and we have more than one. Trus us on that" - which, yeah, the Japanes of course didn't at first. And even thought the first one was a only-of-a-kind. Until the next one hit. After which they immediately surrendered. If you were invested in keeping civilian casualties low, you could have given them a free demonstration first, and THEN start to target their cities with the next one - they'd probably have given up after two bombs (aka "only" one city instead of two) as well.

But there was another reason why they didn't: To impress the Soviets. Because at that time there were already tensions. And the clear message was "don't fuck with us. If we say we gonna' annhilate your cities, we gonna' do that". Which they did.

Ironically - this was also the reason why American scientists deserted directly from the Manhatten projects and gave the technology to the Soviets, to create a power-balance. Even though these scientists weren't communists at all, and hated having to spend the rest of their lifesin Russia, they were deadly afraid of how a rightwing American gouvernment would dominate the world with these bombs without any counter-balance.

Just another nice example of "showing force" gone wrong.
Yes, the two nuclear strikes were both kinda' justified in the war situation. But - as in most politics - going full confrontational also hits yourself HARD in the long-run, because you don't just project strength - you also show the world you can't be trusted with that strength. In this case - that the rest of the world also needs nuclear weapons to protect themselves from the first-strike trigger-happy Americans.
 
Having a genocidal mass murderer be the head of a gouvernment sanctioned black ops organization is NOT in ANY way "realism" or "inspiration from real life".

You may be quite incorrect about the real life scenario, but regardless, Sec.31 is headed by Ash Tyler. Whatever part of him is Voq, its not fair to call Voq a mass murderer or genocidal nogoodnik. We don't know if or when Georgiou takes over Sec31 (this is Trek.. we don't even know which VERSION of her takes over)

Shit like this has NEVER, EVER happened in real life, or would happen, or has ANY kind of real-world relevance to ever talk about.

Are you thinking of the local Public Works departments or actual secret police organizations? Because you might want to throttle back.

The only real-life example that would come close is what the Allied did to the Nazis. And yeah, they didn't give Hitler the CIA afterwards. And that guy wasn't even a cannibal. This is just straight up stupid.

Hitler was dead. They DID give Werner Von Braun the entire US missile and space development program, essentially, except for some side projets like Vanguard that did badly without his input. Von Braun worked hundreds of Jewish slave laborers to death in his underground factories producing V2 rockets that rained hell down on undefended civilians in England. And he was working on an ICBM as part of a larger attempt that would have established nuclear hedgemony. But we needed him and suddenly it wasn't his fault. He never sat on trial at Nuremburg, and we have streets named after him now. Because he was needed. If you don't know history, you can trip over your own feet making bombastic statements.
 
As far as such fantasies go, the folks running Trek have never demonstrated the ability - nor been given the leeway by their employers* - to do the kind of stuff that Section 31 represents with nearly the skill or elan that shows like GoT or Westworld do, so what's the point in pissing away that money on imitating the work of their betters? It's like "dining" at MickeyD's.

Compared to Westworld, The Handmaid's Tale and others, Discovery is amateur hour, and I expect the Section 31 show to be full of the same dour emptiness.
 
You may be quite incorrect about the real life scenario, but regardless, Sec.31 is headed by Ash Tyler. Whatever part of him is Voq, its not fair to call Voq a mass murderer or genocidal nogoodnik. We don't know if or when Georgiou takes over Sec31 (this is Trek.. we don't even know which VERSION of her takes over)

Are you thinking of the local Public Works departments or actual secret police organizations? Because you might want to throttle back.

Hitler was dead. They DID give Werner Von Braun the entire US missile and space development program, essentially, except for some side projets like Vanguard that did badly without his input. Von Braun worked hundreds of Jewish slave laborers to death in his underground factories producing V2 rockets that rained hell down on undefended civilians in England. And he was working on an ICBM as part of a larger attempt that would have established nuclear hedgemony. But we needed him and suddenly it wasn't his fault. He never sat on trial at Nuremburg, and we have streets named after him now. Because he was needed. If you don't know history, you can trip over your own feet making bombastic statements.

  1. Wernher von Braun wasn't the Führer, and didn't personally order genocide or war
  2. He had actual assets in his knowledge superseeding everything the Americans had about rockets - he would be MU Stamets, NOT Georgiou
  3. von Braun was under HEAVY surveillence by the Intelligence after WWII
  4. No one gave him a fucking WEAPON and a list with American names and told him: "You're free to use that on them"!
Jesus fucking Christ.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top