Like it says in the header, SPOILERS!
I really like the story they developed in the documentary. It had issues, of course, and seemed a little half-baked in places, but I assume that should be expected. Nonetheless, I think that it hit on some interesting things.
First, I said that I would respect what they do with Sisko in the story as a reflection on canon with regard to WYLB. I've argued in the past the Sisko is effectively dead, the writers didn't believe he was ever coming back. Clearly, the writers (RDM in particular) state that Sisko is coming back. OK, I accept that as an interpretation of what happened in the finale. However, I don't think what happens at the end of Ep 1 is the same thing. Sisko appearing in multiple places as once sounds too mystical to be described as a return.
Second, it seems like there is some generational conflict developing. I loved that the younger people--Jake, Little Joseph, Molly, and Nog--are the ones eager to expose what is happening. OTOH, it seems like the older characters are working through agendas. They seem to have drifted apart, having difficulties relating to one another.
Third, I hope people don't groan over Section 31. The writers' room was filmed before Discovery, and I know that fatigue set in over Section 31 explanations (not to mention outright resistance). I think the story, such as it is, needs to be viewed in the dynamic of previous DS9 episodes on Section 31.
Fourth, I wasn't sure if the notion of Section 31 trying to destroy the Bajoran religion wasn't too much metacommentary on Star Trek and how people felt about DS9 in particular. Again, this is something that might be refined more if there were further development of the story.
ETA: Fifth, I still am trying to wrap my head around Bashir joining Section 31. Moreover would not his wife, Ezri, know?
I really like the story they developed in the documentary. It had issues, of course, and seemed a little half-baked in places, but I assume that should be expected. Nonetheless, I think that it hit on some interesting things.
First, I said that I would respect what they do with Sisko in the story as a reflection on canon with regard to WYLB. I've argued in the past the Sisko is effectively dead, the writers didn't believe he was ever coming back. Clearly, the writers (RDM in particular) state that Sisko is coming back. OK, I accept that as an interpretation of what happened in the finale. However, I don't think what happens at the end of Ep 1 is the same thing. Sisko appearing in multiple places as once sounds too mystical to be described as a return.
Second, it seems like there is some generational conflict developing. I loved that the younger people--Jake, Little Joseph, Molly, and Nog--are the ones eager to expose what is happening. OTOH, it seems like the older characters are working through agendas. They seem to have drifted apart, having difficulties relating to one another.
Third, I hope people don't groan over Section 31. The writers' room was filmed before Discovery, and I know that fatigue set in over Section 31 explanations (not to mention outright resistance). I think the story, such as it is, needs to be viewed in the dynamic of previous DS9 episodes on Section 31.
Fourth, I wasn't sure if the notion of Section 31 trying to destroy the Bajoran religion wasn't too much metacommentary on Star Trek and how people felt about DS9 in particular. Again, this is something that might be refined more if there were further development of the story.
ETA: Fifth, I still am trying to wrap my head around Bashir joining Section 31. Moreover would not his wife, Ezri, know?