• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Do you feel the dialogue is, at times, unfitting of military/science personnel?

And at least when they use technobabble here it sounds like people talking to each other, instead of the actors slowly enunciating their babble blocks so that three year olds can follow along as was done in the 90s.
"You see the etchings on the hull? That's evidence of catastrophic basidiosac rupture."

"What are they? They are the progenitors of panspermia."

What the fuck?? Discovery is full of techno shit talk :lol:
 
"You see the etchings on the hull? That's evidence of catastrophic basidiosac rupture."

A basidium is a spore-producing reproductive structure found in basidiomycete fungi, a group that includes mushrooms, shelf fungi, rusts, and smuts.

"What are they? They are the progenitors of panspermia."

What the fuck?? Discovery is full of techno shit talk :lol:[/QUOTE]

Really, WTF?! everyone who watches Star Trek should know what panspermia is. That's a pretty basic scifi concept.

So, here's the thing. The technobabble in Discovery actually means something a lot of the time. Can't say the same thing for Berman era meaningfree boilerplate babble blocks.
 
Okay, if you say so :barf:

FYI,

In October 2018, Harvard astronomers presented an analytical model that suggests matter—and potentially dormant spores—can be exchanged across the vast distances between galaxies, a process termed 'galactic panspermia', and not be restricted to the limited scale of solar systems.The detection of an extra-solar object named ʻOumuamua crossing the inner Solar System in a hyperbolic orbit confirms the existence of a continuing material link with exoplanetary systems.

Seems like actual scientists take the theory of panspermia seriously, even if some fans of scifi shows don't.:shrug:
 
FYI,

In October 2018, Harvard astronomers presented an analytical model that suggests matter—and potentially dormant spores—can be exchanged across the vast distances between galaxies, a process termed 'galactic panspermia', and not be restricted to the limited scale of solar systems.The detection of an extra-solar object named ʻOumuamua crossing the inner Solar System in a hyperbolic orbit confirms the existence of a continuing material link with exoplanetary systems.

Seems like actual scientists take the theory of panspermia seriously, even if some fans of scifi shows don't.:shrug:
I think there really is a scientist called Stamets too. It's just that whether it's truth or fiction sometimes the 'babble' aspect makes one's eyes glaze over.
 
I think there really is a scientist called Stamets too. It's just that whether it's truth or fiction sometimes the 'babble' aspect makes one's eyes glaze over.

IMO, Disco doesn't feel like its scripts are littered with the classic TNG scripting guide of [INSERT TECH HERE] chestnut to be filled out sometime after the script is otherwise complete. What I hear is actually cognizant to the episode it appears in.
 
The technobabble, or horseshit if you like, is every bit as incomprehensible in Discovery,as in other Trek incarnations.
Sometimes its best just to have a quiet nod to one's self and say "Okaaaaaay, I'll go with that"
 
Jack O'Neill/MacGyver can do no wrong. Seriously, let's not sully the Richard Dean Anderson.
 
I"m late coming across this thread. But I find it funny as it reminds me of a story I read years ago but not sure if I can verify. Apparently someone asked a bunch of Air Force officers what they thought about Stargate SG-1. Some of them actually said they know RL officers (as in Colonels or higher) who made Jack O'Neill look more serious and by the book.

:lol:

Oh, and to the OP....you have poor understanding of people.
Speaking personally, this is something that frequently breaks the illusion for me.

In a military, or in the sciences, clear communication is of paramount importance. Arguably the single most important directive in either field. A military officer must make themselves clear and communicate appropriately. A scientific paper is meant to convey it's findings in an understandable way, using correct technical language, so that anyone can pick it up and understand it, requiring no cultural context. The crew of USS Discovery often seem to employ very non-clear forms of communication, sometimes even about important topics.

Episodes vary quite drastically in how objectively and clearly people express themselves. People speak unclearly on the bridge at crucial times. People burst in on officers at begin addressing them informally, as only McCoy was sanctioned to do in TOS. Subjective emotional language is sometimes employed by people with backgrounds in the sciences, where they could be expressing themselves in more universal objective ways. Scientific dialogue is in particular frequently delivered in an unclear way, sometimes employing incorrect basic technical terms.

We are meant to accept that the officers of Starfleet are trained astronauts. Also potentially trained military personnel depending on your interpretation of Starfleet. They should express themselves professionally like Major Samantha Carter from Stargate SG1, or like Spock/Data if they are a science officer. As the original Star Trek writer's guide suggested, the illusion of a professional force of officers following set procedures is important to maintaining the illusion that we are watching a future navy.
I've worked in scientific labs or projects, where I've seen technicians or even the scientists laugh over memes on the computer at times. Informal language was used all the time. People don't talk to each other as if they were reciting a scientific journal. Same goes for a military base. They don't talk out of a manual...
 
The Orville is close to perfection, if someone needs a good picture of the modern military.

But I will allow myself to stop here. Some people just get too nervous and insufferable if someone brings The Orville to the Discovery discussion...

30550314f044d524962bfa95df8d92716d1b0fe65ee74f20c49e3cc5d086b972.jpg


Was that before or after a member of this well-trained, professional military crew blew a mission by dry humping a statue? Was the captain following military protocol when he stole a shuttle to spy on his ex wife's personal life? Maybe the academy teaches that it's ok for a goofy green blob of jello to sexually harass the CMO.

Speaking of ex wife, I'm sure a future professional science and military organization would put a captain and his ex fucking wife together on the same ship, with her as the XO no less.

I like The Orville and have seen them all, but this claim is some first-class bullshit. If this is the lense you are viewing the world through, I'd conclude this thread is off my list of things to check in on with any kind of seriousness. It's not because I'm nervous and insufferable (good try though). It's because this is a claim so inane and obviously biased, it makes my eyes roll up into my head involuntarily.
 
"You see the etchings on the hull? That's evidence of catastrophic basidiosac rupture."

"What are they? They are the progenitors of panspermia."

What the fuck?? Discovery is full of techno shit talk :lol:
Well, I understood it...:shrug:
 
Speaking of ex wife, I'm sure a future professional science and military organization would put a captain and his ex fucking wife together on the same ship, with her as the XO no less.

Trek novels beat them to it. With Calhoun and his ex-girlfriend being Captain and XO of the Excalibur.
 
I rather prefer my Star Trek to be a bit more formal when on the bridge and at briefings but informality at other times in other locations is fine.

I think one of the reasons I like TMP so much is that so much of it is professional sounding while on the bridge, although the movie as a whole needed more character moments elsewhere. But even there, McCoy and Decker call out Kirk and they joke a bit to break the tension.

Tilly is a long overdue homage to awkward female nerds everywhere. They need to keep her ramblings to one liners or, as Stamets says, "Talk less," But otherwise I love her. She's meant to be someone talented who lacks a protocol filter, although it's dubious that she should be an officer at this point.

Discovery is not far off the right balance IMO. Whereas NuSpock and NuUhura were snogging on the transporter pad when the Earth was about to implode, Stamets blows out Culber with a simple, "Now is not the right time." No shit; you're both on duty.

They do need to cut down on navel-gazing exposition mind you. That wears after a while.
 
I've noticed plenty of fine moments for her this season. Many people only seem to see her faults and ignore everything else she's done this season. That's sad.
When your former power hitter only hits singles once in a while, time to retire.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top