CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar 2 - Electric Boogaloo-Fanboys gone WILD-too many hyphens

Discussion in 'Fan Productions' started by jespah, May 10, 2018.

?

Do you enjoy pie?

  1. Yes, sweet, please

    79 vote(s)
    41.6%
  2. Yes, savory, please

    42 vote(s)
    22.1%
  3. Yes, any kind

    78 vote(s)
    41.1%
  4. No, I'm a heathen

    36 vote(s)
    18.9%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Tenacity

    Tenacity Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2016
    Location:
    Tenacity
    So basically like what CBS television got from the lawyers for the guy who says CBS stole his ideas and incorporated them into Discovery.
     
    Admiral2 and RedForman like this.
  2. jespah

    jespah Taller than a Hobbit Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Location:
    Boston, the Gateway to the Galaxy
    F. King Daniel and Admiral2 like this.
  3. Noname Given

    Noname Given Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    Noname Given
    No. What they got was an order to turn over a limited amount of discoverable info (listed by the Judge) - and they sat on fulfilling said order to the point the Plaintiff complained; and CBS also claimed a lot of the discovery they received from the Plaintiff was bogus; so the Judge sat both sides down and said, "Work it out, and give me a status report..." - which both sides did.

    What Mr. Peters got was an notification not to destroy or alter evidence as RMB's lawyer has reason to believe a lawsuit may be served against his client; and the Lawyer can use that notification in court (should RMB actually be served and Litigation begun) if Mr. Peters tries to claim "I don't have it because I saw no reason to keep it..." OR what he submits conflicts with hard evidence RMB has on hand.

    Thus no, the situation isn't similar because in the first situation the courtroom Litigation is in process in front of a Judge; while in Mr. Peter's situation, yes, he's filed in GA, BUT the Defendant named has yet to be officially/properly served legal notice of said lawsuit, (which has to happen BEFORE the case is assigned to a Judge and actual in court Litigation of the case starts).
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2019
    jespah likes this.
  4. CorporalCaptain

    CorporalCaptain Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Location:
    astral plane
    Well, M*A*S*H ran for 11 years, although the actual Korean War lasted only three. So...



    yes?
     
    CRM-114, jespah, 137th Gebirg and 3 others like this.
  5. Noname Given

    Noname Given Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    Noname Given
    Yeah, I believe one of the M*A*S*H TV producers stated there were more episodes of M*A*S*H then there were days in the Korean War.
     
    jespah likes this.
  6. CorporalCaptain

    CorporalCaptain Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Location:
    astral plane
    Well, that would have been an exaggeration. ;) (Wikipedia says 256 episodes.)

    But I can imagine someone saying it followed by laugh track laughter and giggling afterwards. :lol:
     
    jespah likes this.
  7. wtriker1701

    wtriker1701 Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Location:
    Platjenwerbe, Germany
    dmac and Therin of Andor like this.
  8. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    I didn't know this was a thing that I needed but here we are :D
     
    RedForman and jespah like this.
  9. Therin of Andor

    Therin of Andor Admiral Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Location:
    New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
    No, he said the show ran longer than the Korean War.

    25 June 1950 – 27 July 1953 vs September 17 1972 – 28 February 1983.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2019
    jespah and fireproof78 like this.
  10. trynda1701

    trynda1701 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Location:
    Somewhere in the darkest reaches of the Universe!
    As an aside (and I think I've mentioned this before on a TV thread), when the BBC first showed M*A*S*H in the UK, they showed it without the laughter track, so I didn't know one existed! It's jarring to see episodes on satellite TV these days with one!
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2019
  11. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Eaten by Cannibals
    There are versions of MASH without a laugh track?? Damn! I had no idea either. Learn something new every day!
     
    trynda1701 and jespah like this.
  12. trynda1701

    trynda1701 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Location:
    Somewhere in the darkest reaches of the Universe!
    One more aside and then I'm done! Do the DVD or Blu Ray sets (if Blu Ray sets exist) of M*A*S*H have an option to turn off the laughter track?
     
  13. 137th Gebirg

    137th Gebirg Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2000
    Location:
    Eaten by Cannibals
    I have the old DVD box set. I will check. I don’t think a BluRay is available.
     
  14. Matthew Raymond

    Matthew Raymond Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2016
    There's no point in a Blu-ray for a standard definition show like that, unless you're trying to cram an entire season onto one disk.
     
  15. Firebird

    Firebird Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Location:
    On the Cinerama screen, in glorious Technicolor.
    Yup, just about every episode has the option to turn off the laugh track (there's one they only had the broadcast version of the episode available) - and that's the only way I've watched the show since the DVDs first came out.

    Much like TNG, M*A*S*H was filmed on 35mm celluloid. Compare the visual quality of the episodes on DVD to the unremastered TNG episodes - there's a big difference. I believe Fox went back to the original prints of the episodes, not the broadcast prints. "Standard definition" is meaningless for anything other than the discs its distributed on.
     
  16. Maurice

    Maurice Snagglepussed Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Real Gone
    I know you're using that to mean "film" but they shot it on acetate safety film. :) Celluloid is too unstable and hasn't been used as motion picture film stock since the 50s.
     
    Harvey, Jedman67, KennyB and 3 others like this.
  17. Matthew Raymond

    Matthew Raymond Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2016
    Did some digging and it seems you're right. Probably would be a lot cheaper than TNG too, because it doesn't have all the visual effects to separately recomposite. Of course, even if they do re-scan the film in higher resolution, they may just put it up for HD streaming and/or iTunes instead of making it available on Blu-ray. "M*A*S*H, remastered in HD! Only on Hulu!"
     
  18. Noname Given

    Noname Given Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    Noname Given
    The live action in TNG was all on film, yes; BUT said film was transferred to Betacam SP (the TV broadcast professional version of the format used in 1987); and the show (and the visual effects too) was edited and composited on said videotape and there were no film masters of the completed episodes. <--- That's one reason the HD version of TNG was so expensive to do (and why they first tried upscaling of the Master Tapes, which looked like a$$.)
     
    BeatleJWOL and Firebird like this.
  19. CorporalCaptain

    CorporalCaptain Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2011
    Location:
    astral plane
    But the VFX ship elements were on film, right?
     
  20. Noname Given

    Noname Given Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2001
    Location:
    Noname Given
    The stuff done by ILM was probably all filmed and transferred. In the 3rd season when Paramount started using other companies and some in house stuff for a time, some of that may have been directly shot and composited on video.