It seems fans in general have no problem with the ridged-brow Romulans suddenly appearing in TNG without explanation.
You know STD means Star Trek Discovery. Lame humor is lame.
Or DIS.Calling Disco, STD is an attempt at lame humor, IMHO.
People have been typing it that way practically since the show was announced, much as they write STID for Into Darkness. That some people haven't noticed it isn't my fault. Trying to tee hee the STD "joke" years on is late to the lameness.Calling Disco, STD is an attempt at lame humor, IMHO.
People have been typing is that way practically since the show was announced, much as they write STID for Into Darkness. That some people haven't notice it isn't my fault. Trying to tee hee the STD "joke" years on is late to the lameness.
I had a huge problem with it. The whole point of the Romulans was that they were indistinguishable from the Vulcans. In TNG, suddenly this was not the case. Even after TNG rebooted them, we saw non-ridged Romulans in ST:V, ST:VI, and even TNG-era Romulans in ST'09.
I personally ignore the ridges in my head canon, and/or interpret them as facial art like that on Nero and crew (and yes, I know the Countdown explanation for why they painted their faces).
People have been typing is that way practically since the show was announced, much as they write STID for Into Darkness. That some people haven't notice it isn't my fault. Trying to tee hee the STD "joke" years on is late to the lameness.
idk, I'm not familiar with your STD and please don't show it to me
also, please don't @ me, just for the purpose of mentioning your STD ever again
also also: skiffy? really?
Yeah, but his medical history is a little bit off topic
Really? How many Star Trek shows do you now that use ST in their acronyms?
No, I'm pretty sure he talks about his disease
Yes, but is rare to see it critiqued. And rarer still to see TNG taken to ask over such a redesign. Or the Trill, and on and on.I had a huge problem with it too, for the same reason. Particularly since it wasn't a case where the design looked a lot better.
You think it might be because it happened thirty years ago, so people might have kinda gotten over it? (Yes, it was a stupid and pointless change.)Yes, but is rare to see it critiqued. And rarer still to see TNG taken to ask over such a redesign. Or the Trill, and on and on.
I've been around this fandom long enough to know that things are not simply "gotten over."You think it might be because it happened thirty years ago, so people might have kinda gotten over it? (Yes, it was a stupid and pointless change.)
No one can crease just one?I wondered why the Talosians suddenly had those awful looking ridges. Only Ruffles should have ridges, obviously. I wonder why they felt the need to update them.
Their iron is broken.No one can crease just one?
![]()
Now there's a 'face palm' that'll leave a mark!Their iron is broken.
Most likely because they weren’t realistic from a biological perspective. The main artists were judges on Face/Off and this was a major deal in makeup effects. The new design shows they have large brains, but that they had skulls to protect them. The originals looked like skin directly over brain tissue, which would cause damage if they even touched their heads. If you’re going to have a huge brain, you need a skull to protect it. They actually do a lot of research into anatomy and biology in order to make more convincing designs. Something that probably didn’t go into the original. They look like they have large tumors instead of brains. I keep expecting them to flop over and kill them. Now they look like a species that evolved or engineered themselves to have large brains.I wondered why the Talosians suddenly had those awful looking ridges. Only Ruffles should have ridges, obviously. I wonder why they felt the need to update them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.