Something else that keeps coming up - and that I'm struggling with, to be honest - is what appears to be an intentional misidentification of the Phoenix in this film as a cosmic force when both the conclusion Apocalypse and the trailer make it clear that, as in The Last Stand, it's not.
Yes, the X-Men go into space, yes, Chastain's villain is an alien, and, yes, the 'inciting incident' for Jean's transformation happens in space, but that doesn't make the Phoenix a "cosmic force".
Probably just a casual error because the Phoenix has been portrayed as a cosmic force in the comics. Kinda like how everyone still reflexively refers to Peter Parker being bitten by a "radioactive" spider when the spiders he was bitten by in the 2002 & 2012 movies were both genetically engineered, not radioactive.
Fox is really shooting itself in the foot here, leaving DP where it was...was probably their best move because if they moved it to Spring it'd have to compete with Captain Marvel and Avengers 4. But now it'll be competing with Godzilla and Toy Story 4 and Secret Life 2. Having 2 Fox films compete with themselves was better than having their last big FoX-Men film be utterly annihilated by the competition.
While I expect
Godzilla to do well overseas, I don't know that it will fare so well in the U.S. And I think live action superhero movies fall into a different category from animated kids movies.
Toy Story 4 will still do the best out of all of these but I don't think that it will siphon away too many viewers from
Dark Phoenix.
Disney is looking to reboot the X-Men ASAP. The further in people's collective memories this version of X-Men is, the easier time Disney will have to reboot.
I don't know how necessary that is. We only got a 2 year gap between Andrew Garfield's
Amazing Spider-Man 2 and Tom Holland's debut in the role in
Captain America: Civil War.
It still doesn't stop me from cringing every time I think of cramming mutants into the MCU. I don't think the X-Men make sense within the regular Marvel comics continuity. I certainly don't see them adding anything to the MCU except for confusion.
They also should've just made Havok into Scott's father instead of his much older brother here. Would've fit better than him being in his 40s and still looking like his 20s with a teenage brother.
Agreed. Although, I've known families like that where there's a huge age gap between siblings. My grandfather is 18 years older than his youngest brother.
Apocalypse made money, and the producers had more stories they wanted to tell; ending the franchise with DoFP "because it was good" isn't how things work.
Sometimes it is. Hugh Jackman seems pretty committed to going out on a high note with
Logan. I often wonder if Jackman would have even bothered doing any more Wolverine spin-off movies had either of the earlier ones turned out as well as
Logan did. (I'm not particularly fond of that movie but I acknowledge that I'm in a minority on that point.)
It didn't really last that whole time. It basically ended in 2006, had a failed attempt at a rebirth in 2009 and then restarted in 2011 until now.
I don't know that you can even really count the gap between
X-Men: The Last Stand and
X-Men Origins: Wolverine as a pause given that 3 years was the standard back then. That was already how they released the first 3 movies in 2000, 2003, & 2006.
They're part of a single connected universe in the broadest of strokes. Being based on comic books which have very loose continuity themselves, it makes it more acceptable for a 6-foot-plus black man to transform into a diminutive white man than in most franchises.
While it's confusing to have 2 different, unrelated characters named Trask in your fictional universe, I don't think we're supposed to assume that they're anywhere near the same person. Similarly, my headcanon only makes sense if I assume that Victor Creed in
X-Men Origins: Wolverine and Sabretooth in
X-Men are different people. (Note that neither one is ever referred to by the other name, even in the credits.)
I think it's pretty clear that it's all supposed to be a single movie continuity, even if it's one of the most recklessly assembled ones that I've ever seen. If
X-Men: First Class was supposed to be a reboot rather than a prequel, I suspect that it (A) wouldn't have been a period piece and (B) they would have included more iconic characters on the team like Cyclops, Jean Grey, & Iceman. As is, while there are some definite continuity flubs that show up when you do a close reading of the films, I think that there's a definite casual linkage between all of the films where they try to avoid any really glaring contradictions.
Wasn't Gambit (which we are STILL waiting for!) supposed to be one of those in the Origin series? Nothing really came of it until First Class, which was kinda like X-Men Origins, but of a bunch of 'em at once.
IIRC, the
Origins series was cut off when most of their material for
X-Men Origins: Magneto ended up getting folded into
X-Men: First Class.
Does Disney have a non-Disney company to release R-rated movies through? I just double checked on Wikipedia and Disney no longer owns Miramax, who they used to use for their R-rated movies.
I don't know what their status is now but Disney also had imprint labels for Touchstone Pictures (in-house productions that were deemed too edgy to bear the Disney name like
Ed Wood &
Who Framed Roger Rabbit?) and Dimension Films (their genre label for sci-fi, fantasy, & horror films like
The Crow, From Dusk 'Till Dawn, Highlander: Endgame, &
Scream). Miramax seemed to be more of their prestige label for Oscar bait like
Good Will Hunting &
Shakespeare in Love.
Personally, I hope that Disney keeps 20th Century Fox running as one of their imprints. I'm also hoping that we can put the 20th Century Fox fanfare back onto the
Star Wars movies. They just feel naked without it!