• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The X-Men Cinematic Universe (General Discussion)

I seem to remember that they talked about keeping Deadpool rated R and just releasing it under a separate (but Disney owned) brand or something like that. Once Upon a Deadpool is not something I can see them getting away with for a potential Deadpool 3. Disney won't release Rated r movies under the "Disney" brand, but they've released higher rated stuff before, just not under the Walt Disney Studios banner.

Since Deadpool is an established (and money making) R rated franchise, I can see Disney just doing that. Its not like the talk of Black Widow being R rated, since she's a pre established hero in the PG-13 rated movies.

The MCU is released under the Marvel banner, so releasing an R rated Marvel movie wouldn't be any stranger for Disney than an R-Rated Mirimax movie.
 
Was it? I thought it was to raise money for charity ;-)

Also, Disney has stated on multiple occasions (as you like to say) that they are ok with making R-rated Deadpool movies.

Ok with making them (which I never doubted) or ok with making them in the MCU specifically?
 
Ok with making them (which I never doubted) or ok with making them in the MCU specifically?

Does it really matter?

Deadpool doesn't need to interact with Dr. Srange and Iron Man to work. It can be its own thing and still be entertaining. Might even work better, honestly. Or they can have him interact with whoever helps with whatever joke they're going for, there really doesn't have to be any baggage that people are bringing with it. Continuity doesn't matter a lick for this franchise.
 
Does Disney have a non-Disney company to release R-rated movies through? I just double checked on Wikipedia and Disney no longer owns Miramax, who they used to use for their R-rated movies.
 
Does Disney have a non-Disney company to release R-rated movies through? I just double checked on Wikipedia and Disney no longer owns Miramax, who they used to use for their R-rated movies.

Precedent is already set though. They can release R-rated movies through owned studios without doing anything revolutionary. So if they use Marvel Studios to make an R-rated Deadpool, nothing revolutionary will have occurred.
 
In case everyone has forgotten, the Deadpool movies and Logan already start with the Marvel logo, so this is not a branding problem in the slightest.

It's probably ultimately up the Kevin Feige as to whether or not he wants to include Deadpool in the established MCU and/or retain Reynolds in the role. Honestly, it would be insane to recast at this point and Ragnarok has already proven they're willing to really push the comedy aspect on certain projects.
 
Disney is still going forward with R-rated movies via Fox.

Iger Says Disney Will ‘Continue’ in the Business of R-Rated Deadpool Movies
When asked about the nature of the studio releasing these types of movies after the acquisition is complete, Iger specifically called out the success of the Deadpool films and said: “We’re going to continue in that business, and there might be room for more of that.”

What other R rated Marvel movies, if any, Iger is referring to remains to be seen.

Iger noted however that the studio would have to be very careful in their branding of the films, citing a need to make sure that the films are properly marketed as being R rated.
Coming Soon
 
I don't disagree, I just think it's a shame is all.


I think with Jackman it's a case of never say never if the right script comes along, but yeah, I'd be very surprised if that happens within the next decade or so.

I could also see them maybe *possibly* getting Dafne Keen back as X-23 since 1) she'd be older by the time they get around to it and as such will have just enough distance from 'Logan' and 2) we never saw her as a fully realised hero, just what was basically her origin story, so they could introduce her much like they did with Spider-Man, i.e., with the assumption that the audience already has the gist of the character's background, if not their specific version of those events.

Ryan Reynolds on the other hand I see zero problem with just dropping him into the MCU as is. Mostly because Deadpool being Deadpool he'll break the 4th wall and point out he's the only one to have survived the Fox merger. You could even work his foul language into the PG13 movies by just bleeping it out and having him hear the bleeps and get increasingly frustrated with them, to the utter bewilderment of everyone else around him.
I mean after Ragnarok, he'd be a perfect fit for a Thor movie, no?

I'd love it if Thor somehow cuts Deadpool in half with his axe and Deadpool goes back together. All a misunderstanding, of course.
 
Something else that keeps coming up - and that I'm struggling with, to be honest - is what appears to be an intentional misidentification of the Phoenix in this film as a cosmic force when both the conclusion Apocalypse and the trailer make it clear that, as in The Last Stand, it's not.

Yes, the X-Men go into space, yes, Chastain's villain is an alien, and, yes, the 'inciting incident' for Jean's transformation happens in space, but that doesn't make the Phoenix a "cosmic force".

Probably just a casual error because the Phoenix has been portrayed as a cosmic force in the comics. Kinda like how everyone still reflexively refers to Peter Parker being bitten by a "radioactive" spider when the spiders he was bitten by in the 2002 & 2012 movies were both genetically engineered, not radioactive.

Fox is really shooting itself in the foot here, leaving DP where it was...was probably their best move because if they moved it to Spring it'd have to compete with Captain Marvel and Avengers 4. But now it'll be competing with Godzilla and Toy Story 4 and Secret Life 2. Having 2 Fox films compete with themselves was better than having their last big FoX-Men film be utterly annihilated by the competition.

While I expect Godzilla to do well overseas, I don't know that it will fare so well in the U.S. And I think live action superhero movies fall into a different category from animated kids movies. Toy Story 4 will still do the best out of all of these but I don't think that it will siphon away too many viewers from Dark Phoenix.

Disney is looking to reboot the X-Men ASAP. The further in people's collective memories this version of X-Men is, the easier time Disney will have to reboot.

I don't know how necessary that is. We only got a 2 year gap between Andrew Garfield's Amazing Spider-Man 2 and Tom Holland's debut in the role in Captain America: Civil War.

It still doesn't stop me from cringing every time I think of cramming mutants into the MCU. I don't think the X-Men make sense within the regular Marvel comics continuity. I certainly don't see them adding anything to the MCU except for confusion.

They also should've just made Havok into Scott's father instead of his much older brother here. Would've fit better than him being in his 40s and still looking like his 20s with a teenage brother.

Agreed. Although, I've known families like that where there's a huge age gap between siblings. My grandfather is 18 years older than his youngest brother.

Apocalypse made money, and the producers had more stories they wanted to tell; ending the franchise with DoFP "because it was good" isn't how things work.

Sometimes it is. Hugh Jackman seems pretty committed to going out on a high note with Logan. I often wonder if Jackman would have even bothered doing any more Wolverine spin-off movies had either of the earlier ones turned out as well as Logan did. (I'm not particularly fond of that movie but I acknowledge that I'm in a minority on that point.)

It didn't really last that whole time. It basically ended in 2006, had a failed attempt at a rebirth in 2009 and then restarted in 2011 until now.

I don't know that you can even really count the gap between X-Men: The Last Stand and X-Men Origins: Wolverine as a pause given that 3 years was the standard back then. That was already how they released the first 3 movies in 2000, 2003, & 2006.

They're part of a single connected universe in the broadest of strokes. Being based on comic books which have very loose continuity themselves, it makes it more acceptable for a 6-foot-plus black man to transform into a diminutive white man than in most franchises.

While it's confusing to have 2 different, unrelated characters named Trask in your fictional universe, I don't think we're supposed to assume that they're anywhere near the same person. Similarly, my headcanon only makes sense if I assume that Victor Creed in X-Men Origins: Wolverine and Sabretooth in X-Men are different people. (Note that neither one is ever referred to by the other name, even in the credits.)

I think it's pretty clear that it's all supposed to be a single movie continuity, even if it's one of the most recklessly assembled ones that I've ever seen. If X-Men: First Class was supposed to be a reboot rather than a prequel, I suspect that it (A) wouldn't have been a period piece and (B) they would have included more iconic characters on the team like Cyclops, Jean Grey, & Iceman. As is, while there are some definite continuity flubs that show up when you do a close reading of the films, I think that there's a definite casual linkage between all of the films where they try to avoid any really glaring contradictions.

Wasn't Gambit (which we are STILL waiting for!) supposed to be one of those in the Origin series? Nothing really came of it until First Class, which was kinda like X-Men Origins, but of a bunch of 'em at once.

IIRC, the Origins series was cut off when most of their material for X-Men Origins: Magneto ended up getting folded into X-Men: First Class.

Does Disney have a non-Disney company to release R-rated movies through? I just double checked on Wikipedia and Disney no longer owns Miramax, who they used to use for their R-rated movies.

I don't know what their status is now but Disney also had imprint labels for Touchstone Pictures (in-house productions that were deemed too edgy to bear the Disney name like Ed Wood & Who Framed Roger Rabbit?) and Dimension Films (their genre label for sci-fi, fantasy, & horror films like The Crow, From Dusk 'Till Dawn, Highlander: Endgame, & Scream). Miramax seemed to be more of their prestige label for Oscar bait like Good Will Hunting & Shakespeare in Love.

Personally, I hope that Disney keeps 20th Century Fox running as one of their imprints. I'm also hoping that we can put the 20th Century Fox fanfare back onto the Star Wars movies. They just feel naked without it!
 
Does it really matter?

Deadpool doesn't need to interact with Dr. Srange and Iron Man to work. It can be its own thing and still be entertaining. Might even work better, honestly. Or they can have him interact with whoever helps with whatever joke they're going for, there really doesn't have to be any baggage that people are bringing with it. Continuity doesn't matter a lick for this franchise.

I mean it matters for this conversation. I think I already said that Deadpool could go on entirely by himself. And I would be totally fine with that, although my ideal scenario would be an r rated DP franchise which is allowed to do pg crossovers with the MCU. But this conversation is about whether it's at all likely that Deadpool will be allowed to exist in the MCU or not.

And come to think of it, now that you mention continuity - it may not matter a lick for Deadpool, but it kind of does to the MCU. Which could be an extra problem there, since bringing Deadpool in could mean Feige would have to taylor the new MCU X-men to fit what Deadpool has already shown. And that may not even be possible, or may be completely at odds with what he wants to do with the X-Men.

Precedent is already set though. They can release R-rated movies through owned studios without doing anything revolutionary. So if they use Marvel Studios to make an R-rated Deadpool, nothing revolutionary will have occurred.

In case everyone has forgotten, the Deadpool movies and Logan already start with the Marvel logo, so this is not a branding problem in the slightest.

It's probably ultimately up the Kevin Feige as to whether or not he wants to include Deadpool in the established MCU and/or retain Reynolds in the role. Honestly, it would be insane to recast at this point and Ragnarok has already proven they're willing to really push the comedy aspect on certain projects.

This isn't a question of whether it would be revolutionary for Disney studios or the Marvel comics brand. It would be revolutionary for the MCU brand, and we have seen signs before that the mcu movies are being deliberately kept away from non-family friendly content.

Hearing it confirmed the Deadpool will continue in its own style no matter what is great, but unless anyone has any clarifying quotes to the contrary I still highly doubt the idea that Deadpool will become part of the MCU.
 
As somebody who loves the way that the XMCU has dealt with the concept of time travel thus far, I'm extremely happy that this new trailer confirms beyond any doubt that the movie is essentially reworking the "Dark Phoenix" elements of The Last Stand just as Logan showed us a different version of the dystopian future that we saw in Days of Future Past.

Raven dying instead of Charles and Scott is an interesting way to change up the story and presents some great opportunities for internal conflict and strife, as does Erik wanting to kill Jean this time around instead of wanting to try and control her as he did in the original timeline.
 
As somebody who loves the way that the XMCU has dealt with the concept of time travel thus far, I'm extremely happy that this new trailer confirms beyond any doubt that the movie is essentially reworking the "Dark Phoenix" elements of The Last Stand just as Logan showed us a different version of the dystopian future that we saw in Days of Future Past.

Raven dying instead of Charles and Scott is an interesting way to change up the story and presents some great opportunities for internal conflict and strife, as does Erik wanting to kill Jean this time around instead of wanting to try and control her as he did in the original timeline.

Wow, how do you come up with this shit...
 
.....but this conversation is about whether it's at all likely that Deadpool will be allowed to exist in the MCU or not.

And come to think of it, now that you mention continuity - it may not matter a lick for Deadpool, but it kind of does to the MCU. Which could be an extra problem there, since bringing Deadpool in could mean Feige would have to taylor the new MCU X-men to fit what Deadpool has already shown.
Not a bit of it.

As previously mentioned 'Oh Man, I survived the Fox acquisition', along with 'What the...have I been rebooted ?' and 'Hey Man, didn't you used to have a different head ?' at the relevant points is all the explanation required.
 
Not a bit of it.

As previously mentioned 'Oh Man, I survived the Fox acquisition', along with 'What the...have I been rebooted ?' and 'Hey Man, didn't you used to have a different head ?' at the relevant points is all the explanation required.

So you're suggesting they'll just reboot Deadpool in line with the new style X-Men? That could work, maybe. It would definitely be a good source of humor, as long as the audience is willing to go along and not put off by dumping (some of) the story/characters of the first two films.

Still leaves the issue of whether they're willing to connect an r rated franchise to the mcu in the first place, of course.
 
Well I have no idea who's funeral that is! I can't wait to see the movie and find out! Wow they're really withholding who dies in these trailers!
:p
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I would've expected them to try to distance this from The Last Stand, but when Jean's voiceover said "When I lose control, people I love die," they made a point of showing Xavier and Cyclops.

Still, it looks like a very different movie, one where Jean is more front-and-center, as she should've been the first time.
 
As a rare poster here, I'm just chiming in to say that I have enjoyed pretty much all the X-Men movies, both casts, and am greatly looking forward to this supposed final installment. In terms of continuity and chronology, all that seems sure is that "Logan" is chronologically the end of this cinematic universe, regardless of pre- or post-DOFP timelines.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top