And you always get "Dr. Spock" right as well!**looks quickly to see if I misspelled it.**
**Whew!** Not me!
And you always get "Dr. Spock" right as well!**looks quickly to see if I misspelled it.**
**Whew!** Not me!
^^^Mia as Amanda is definitely hitting it out of the park. Amanda is written so strongly that I can't buy her going along with Sarek and not allowing affection with/to/from Spock.
Frain is fine, but Sarek's character has been a little boring.
I expect more hard-hitting wisdom from the character.
Agreed. And I like Frain.Mark Lenard can't be beaten.
i think he's doing a great job though I do feel a little weird about Sarek sometimes because I'm too used to seeing Frain playing bad guys.
I like Frain as Sarek. I also like deconstructing the character, trying to figure out what makes him tick. Here is a Vulcan man from a very high status family who was betrothed in traditional fashion to a girl from an equally high status family, only something went wrong. The girl — Sybok’s mother — got religion sometime after Sarek’s first Pon Farr and became a high priestess in the temple and Sarek and his wife divorced or the marriage was dissolved. For whatever reason, he doesn’t seem to know the first son that well. Maybe there are rules that the offspring of such a marriage is reared by the mother and intended for the temple life.
So Sarek is presumably disillusioned and does what he wants to do, since the traditional way doesn’t work. He becomes ambassador to Earth and is fascinated by humans. He has a thing for human women and falls in love with and marries Amanda, while telling himself it is logical for the ambassador to do so to further human-Vulcan relations. But, contradictory man that he is, he decides that his human wife and half human child should follow the Vulcan path and he puts extraordinary pressure on them both to make that half human, half Vulcan son a perfect Vulcan so Sarek can prove something to the establishment.
When some judge misguidedly allows the ambassador and his human wife to foster a human orphan, Sarek also turns that child into a sociology experiment. Yet he also loves that child passionately and even gives up a literal piece of his soul to bring her back from the dead. And he loves his wife and son, though he never says so outright.
Sarek is massively flawed and a pretty lousy husband and father, but he is an extremely interesting character.
I certainly like what the writing has done for Sarek most of all, adding more dimensions to his relationship with his society and how he wants it to become than ever before. And so far, among the recast roles, Sarek has been the most illuminating and wide-reaching when it comes to Star Trek lore as a whole, IMHO.
Really bad guys. Just the two I've seen were cold blooded killers.
This may be part of my problem. I don't really care about learning more about Sarek. He's a supporting player, not someone I want or expect to see explored in depth. His actions were typically dictated by the needs of stories being told about another character -- Spock -- rather than because they make sense on their own. I'm not sure digging at that too much is a wise idea.
The point of supporting players is to add to dimension of the players they are supporting. Sarek is still a supporting character, that hasn't changed. It just that it isn't Spock he's supporting here, so of course there will be digging, because relationships between people are by nature unique to their pairing.
I feel about Sarek as I do Burnham: Neither has engaged me so far, and I can't tell if it's just the writing or both the writing and the performance.
TBH, I wouldn't mind if we never saw Sarek again.
Why?but I got the strong impression that Sarek was part of Section 31 from the last two episodes of S1.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.