And also aired just before DS9 premiered, so that's as big a lead-in as you're gonna get.but Chain of Command Parts 1 & 2 portrays itself as a lead-in to the events where DS9 begins
This is the best answer, IMHO. Why? Because this set Sisko on the path towards both becoming CO of DS9 and for helping develop the Defiant.Best of Both Worlds Pt 2![]()
Exactly. The closest thing to a lead-in was: "Chain of Command," Parts I & II.And also aired just before DS9 premiered, so that's as big a lead-in as you're gonna get.![]()
"The Best of Both Worlds, Part II" aired over two years earlier, with many episodes afterwards and before DS9, which means it was not remotely a "lead-in," just as "Space Seed" was not a lead-in to The Wrath of Khan.
The episode uses BOBW2 as the lead-in retroactively so.... The episode serves as an in-universe lead-in episode to "Emissary"That's not what a lead-in is, so....
If DS9 had premiered in 1990 after or soon after BOBW2, you'd have a point.
There isn't anything that sets up the station, but Chain of Command Parts 1 & 2 portrays itself as a lead-in to the events where DS9 begins, with tensions flaring up between the Federation and the Cardassians following the latter's withdrawal from the Bajorian system.
More on this from Memory Alpha [https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Chain_of_Command,_Part_I_(episode)]:It should be noted that the Ferengi in "Chain of Command" was suppose to have been Quark.
Jason
And he was also suppose to show up years later on the Ba’ku planet in “Star Trek Insurrection”. But aside from the one episode with the Duras sisters (which didn’t make a lot of sense—-why are you piping a Starfleet call down to the civilian barkeep?), Quark never did crossover.It should be noted that the Ferengi in "Chain of Command" was suppose to have been Quark.
Jason
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.