Michael Burnham is the Chosen One
- Thread starter Kane_Steel
- Start date
- Status
One of my favorite comic series. Very interesting take, but it isn't for the faint of heart.I had to ask...
Just looked it up. Yeah, after my time.
There's some of that projection again.
Again, you're the one desperately bringing up gender politics, for no good reason. It's not relevant to the discussion.
According to you, the man who claimed Superman was emasculated. Do you honestly think anyone actually believes anything you say?
It's not relevant to the discussion.
Never made that claim. Go back and check. Gender wasn't even brought up until your little rant.
The game was much better.
No, the word gender was not brought up. You just happen to hate female characters who are capable and only want male characters who are capable for some mysterious reason. It has nothing to do with gender. What a mystery.
I appreciated the game very much, but I thought Injustice did a great job of intertwining many different facts of DC's universe.
Both are great additions.
That's your own personal conspiracy theory. This is where your projecting comes into play.
I've discussed the positives and negatives of both male and female characters before. Female characters can be great. I'm certain I've praised the female cast of Black Panther on this board several times, for example.
Amusingly, Burnham being Black is actually the one positive I like about the character.
Despite being a complete bore of a character, at least on a surface level she's doing good for African-American representation.
Whatever you say.
I agree, my fellow compatriot. It’s quite a thing to see the darkies get their limelight. Now if you will excuse me, I’m going to watch GUNGA DIN, a good natured adventurous film with charismatic leads, exciting action, and lovely warm-hearted racism.
I think when you create characters you don't necessarily know which ones are going to develop into the most interesting. Designating Michael as the lead character is risky if she doesn't become compelling. Right now it doesn't look too good.
It's like having having Tom Paris or Geordi LaForge as your main characters. Yuck.
Poor writing, as well as SMG's mediocre acting and limited range haven't helped matters either.
Obviously there's been many competent female characters through out history that weren't called Mary Sues.
It's like having having Tom Paris or Geordi LaForge as your main characters. Yuck.
Poor writing, as well as SMG's mediocre acting and limited range haven't helped matters either.
Obviously there's been many competent female characters through out history that weren't called Mary Sues.
Her acting and range is fine.
I find her compelling. Must be a personal problem since outside of this echo chamber she’s fairly popular.
There are apparently two different versions of season 1 that are getting streamed. I've seen the one where Discovery took a lot of risks, made great casting decisions and delivered compelling scripts.
And then there's the alternative version that some people have seen that has terrible acting, awful stories, made by a callous showrunner who hated Star Trek so much he didn't go back in time 60 years to film it.
You're apparently only allowed to view one of these series. must be a licensing issue. I don't think Ver.A viewers are able to converse in a common dialogue with Ver.B viewers.
- Status
Similar threads
