I think there should be a separate military organization in the Federation. Leave exploration and diplomacy to Starfleet--that's what they love to do, anyway. A UFP version of MACO fits the bill.
I think there should be a separate military organization in the Federation. Leave exploration and diplomacy to Starfleet--that's what they love to do, anyway. A UFP version of MACO fits the bill.
Yes, yes, I know. Though calling them "Marines" seems kind of tacky to me.In other words, this.![]()
Yeah except no starfleet connectionIn other words, this.![]()
I wouldn’t say that around them, they would probably put you in a hospital. Marine have savings ass since forever.Yes, yes, I know. Though calling them "Marines" seems kind of tacky to me.
Yeah except no starfleet connection
But in a way wouldn’t that put them below starfleet. The head of the marine division would have to answer to a “navy” man, a man who probably knows nothing about ground operations. A military man would answer to a non military man who wasn’t even the president. In a way the starfleet could convince the president that the situation could be handled by diplomacy and weaken the federations position just so starfleet “navy” could try and take all the glory. By keeping them separate they both can report to the president or report to so minister or secretary that wasn’t biased.Why not?
Ever since TOS, we've known that the Federation Starfleet is a "combined service". Makes sense that the Starfleet "navy" would be the starship crews, and the "marines" would be the ground troops.
Both divisions are still Starfleet - they just use the appropriate rank system for each.
Read the post again I was in the middle of editing it and also the us marines and navy use to be on branch of sorts now they are just controlled by the same civilian department: the department of the navy. They were separate for a reason I just cannot find itNo, it would not.
Both the naval and marine contingents are still Starfleet, after all.
The head of the marine division would have to answer to a “navy” man, a man who probably knows nothing about ground operations.
Well I don’t know I just because I think United federation of planets marine corps sounds better. Why no t give them some independence. Also the navy back in the day tried having two top dogs Kinda like your suggesting, it didn’t work out so well.Not necessarily.
Ideally, the Admiral who is in command of all of Starfleet's naval operations, and the General who is the commandant of the Starfleet marines, would jointly report to the Federation's secretary of defense. I don't see any reason why either division would have to be subordinate to the other.
I think United federation of planets marine corps sounds better.
Then explain why the US has 7 uniform service and they rock when apparently one is enoughI don't agree. IMHO, it's more efficient to have a single, unified military command. Just have Starfleet be responsible for all military services the Federation might require - naval OR marine.
There's really no reason to have separate services where one will do.
Then explain who the is has 7 uniform service and they rock
Read it again. Stupid auto correctCome again?![]()
Then explain why the US has 7 uniform service and they rock when apparently one is enough
Then explain how the us uniforms service/ armed forces are probably the best In the world and a lot of us military peoples would still support have them separate. And in the end they answer to one person so what’s wrong with letting them have there independence. And using Canada as evidence is not the best since they are so weak.Indeed. One service IS enough.
It works for the Canadian Forces, doesn't it? Ever since unification was achieved in 1968, Canada has had a single military command, just like the Starfleet we're discussing here. I don't see any real reason why this wouldn't work in the US as well. As it stands, the US military has way too many separate services - it's too inefficient and bureaucratic. Doesn't make any logical sense for there to be so many different services. It doesn't have to be that way.
It's more efficient to have FEWER branches, not more of them.
Besides propaganda. They love telling everyone that stARflEet iSn'T mILitAry.There's really no reason to have separate services where one will do.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.