I appreciate the point, but this is a factually inaccurate statement. There have been countless complaints about the frowniness of Snyderman.
Not from a two-minute trailer.
I appreciate the point, but this is a factually inaccurate statement. There have been countless complaints about the frowniness of Snyderman.
No, not that popular historically. Not popular with me now !It's also worth noting that this is the *only* incarnation of "Captain Marvel" (except the big red cheese) that has ever been even a little bit popular, and she is *very* popular, rocketing right up there with the likes of Iron Man.
And since when were only really old comics worthy of adaptation? A good story and character is a good story and character.
This must be one of the quickest characters to get a movie since she only became Captain Marvel about 4 years ago.
No, not that popular historically. Not popular with me now !
Carol has been on the wrong side of successive super-hero throwdowns and I find the character pretty unlikeable. I don't like her with Alpha Flight and the only place I've warmed to her at all is as an occasional supporting character in Jessica Jones.
Unlike Kirk, my hope is that the cinematic Captain Marvel will be quite different to what we have in the comics.
That was a totally different character in the Captain Marvel/ Shazaam lineage. The Marvel comic version didn't start until the 1960s, and Carol Danvors didnt aquire the mantel until recently.Not that quick; in the 1940s, Captain America made his comic book debut in '41, with the Republic serial released in 1944. Similarly, Adventures of Captain Marvel serial (1941) was not long in coming after the comic debut in 1940.
I'm not sure how popular Captain Marvel really is. There's a lot of telling rather showing on Marvel's part. She's great because Marvel says's she's great. She's also seems to have gone through a lot of revamps and relaunches since gaining the title "Captain Marvel". Which makes me think they've never really found a hook. In the latest "The Life of Captain Marvel" her origin is being changedI'll be honest, I doubt your personal dislike of the character significantly factors into the character's overall popularity...![]()
I think @TREK_GOD_1 knows that. He's not saying they're the same character or even related, he's using The Golden Age Captain Marvel (Shazam) as an example of a short time between a character's first appearance and it's first film adaptation.That was a totally different character in the Captain Marvel/ Shazaam lineage. The Marvel comic version didn't start until the 1960s, and Carol Danvors didnt aquire the mantel until recently.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_Marvel_(Marvel_Comics)
At least it's no "You're all astronauts... on some kind of star trek."I just not a fan of using the “Marvel” name with a Marvel property. Feels very on the nose.
I'll be honest, I doubt your personal dislike of the character significantly factors into the character's overall popularity...
.
I really liked the Guardians films and Ant-Man, but I've no particular attachment to their comic's versions. Similarly, I don't read Daredevil, Luke Cage, Iron Fist or Jessica Jones but quite enjoy their TV shows (okay maybe not Iron Fist season 1When the first Iron Man movie was released, I despised the character as he was in the comics at the time (post-Civil War one) and had to be dragged kicking and screaming to see the movie. Amazingly enough, his portrayal in the comics had very little to do with his portrayal in the movie.
Remember when Wolverine was on the Avengers, X-Men, hanging out with Spider-Man and basically on every single cover? Was that a diversity push for Canadians or it is only a problem when it's a woman or minority?I don’t know if she’s popular but they have been shoehorning her in to many Marvel stories recently. I just assumed that was part of their diversity push.
I call it "overexposure".Remember when Wolverine was on the Avengers, X-Men, hanging out with Spider-Man and basically on every single cover? Was that a diversity push for Canadians or it is only a problem when it's a woman or minority?
You’re right, there are too many men in comics. Time to narrow it down to roughly 50% like in real life.I call it "overexposure".
I recall something that I read in a ca. 1990 letter column where somebody said that the only way Batman could have been more overexposed at that point was if he'd started appearing in Marvel's books.
The sad thing was that wasn't even peak Wolverine.Not at all what I'm talking about. I'm talking about overusing individual, fan-favorite characters, not gender issues.
I recall something that I read in a ca. 1990 letter column where somebody said that the only way Batman could have been more overexposed at that point was if he'd started appearing in Marvel's books.
Nah, let's overcorrect. I vote we keep Superman, and bag the rest.You’re right, there are too many men in comics. Time to narrow it down to roughly 50% like in real life.
Sorry.Wait to watch the final product before judging? That's crazy talk! You do realize your're on the internet, right?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.