I'd love that, but unfortunately that solution would most likely just alienate non-hardcore fans from the books. I mean, Trek books are already hard to sell I assume, saying "They're in an alternate timeline that you've never seen before and never will and contradicts what you know when you watched the [most recent] show" seems like a terrible marketing strategy.
I agree they are already hard to sell. Not to say they're not accessible but someone picking up one of them at random will get a good comprehensible story about some characters who are in very, very different places to where they last saw them. I don't think Pocket's audience are non-hardcore fans anymore. They're selling to a group of people who are invested in the "extended universe" as a whole. And while I know there's a gap between the average Pocket reader and those who post on this board, I would bet there are very few readers that just pick up one novel (from the "relaunch" timeline) per year.
So if I'm Pocket Books, and I know that new TV Star Trek is a thing, and I've been watching Discovery and seeing just how close it gets to invalidating that relaunch timeline that is pretty profitable for me, I would be looking to get some reassurance that I would be able to keep producing those books. Especially if my contract didn't necessarily allow me to develop books around the new series for newer fans.
"Remove books from sale if they are inconsistent"? Why in the actual fuck would they be required to do that? First Contact didn't require the novel Federation to be pulled. Indeed, Federation, The Final Reflection and the Rihansu novels were re-printed well after on-screen material overrode them.
Hell, over in Star Wars, Splinter of the Mind's Eye was just reprinted with the new Legends banner on its cover, and that's as inconsistent with onscreen canon as they come.
Books do not get pulled from sale just because they become inconsistent with the onscreen material. That's really not how this shit works at all.
It seems unlikely yeah, but then that raises the question of where the line is drawn, surely? If I can keep selling and printing books that contradict the cannon, if they were written before, why is it suddenly a problem to print and sell books contradicting the cannon afterwards? I mean, the average reader isn't going to look at the book publication date. If the Borg turn up in the new series, your average reader is going to be just as confused/not bothered by Destiny as they are by whatever book comes out next year. But if it is just new books, what is the cut-off there? How much notice do Pocket get of changes that their new stuff has to take into account? Do they have to nix books already in development? And how big does an inconsistency have to be in order to stop stuff happening? And how does it work with the fact we have a connected, ongoing storyline?
I mean, back in the day, it was always fine to take the characters weird places if they were put back at the end, through use of some time travel mechanism or whatever. Data and Wesley could get married as long as they were unmarried by the end of the book. Is that only on a per-book basis? What if Pocket developed a way to tie-off the novelverse and reset things at the end? How long are they given to do that? How many books can they produce?
Unlike Sci, I don't have any insight here and I wasn't part of the process, and if it the case that it just took a Pocket a year or so to negotiate the exact same deal they had in the 90s then fair enough. But that seems unlikely to me. If I'm Pocket, and I know about new Trek series being potentially on the table I will have two aims:
1) to get the ability to do tie-in novels for those and;
2) to protect my currently profitable tie-in line that's mostly based around a connected, developed universe that's been spun off from the modern series.
I would certainly need some guarantees and assurances that I could keep running my business without risking it being turned on its head at any point with no notice. Otherwise it wouldn't be worth doing.
So between that, and the quote from Dayton earlier, I find it hard to believe we're "on borrowed time" or anything here. The license renewal took so long, there's no way this stuff wasn't all considered. And if Pocket didn't find a satisfactory way forwards, there's no way they jump right back in to the connected universe stuff when it's so potentially risky.
That doesn't mean things will last forever, maybe the agreement involved being given some leeway in return for tying up the novelverse in a few years. Or maybe it will just all get labelled as an alternate universe (I know that's not what happens, but also isn't that exactly what's happening with STO?)