• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Dune 2018 (19,20,21...)

I'll just have the original novel. If I get one movie about the original novel that is decent I'll be pretty happy.

The constant infighting over BH/KJA and the like is tiresome and boring and can sound remarkably petty. To me, saying that the newer novels can somehow erase Frank Herbert's legacy is like saying that Peter Jackson's LOTR and the Hobbit erases Tolkien's legacy. It makes no sense.
Yeah, as much as I dislike the new stuff, I don't get anywhere near being "upset" about them. The original novels aren't going anywhere and in 100 years, 'Frank Herbert's Dune' will still be on the shelves alongside the likes of 'Mary Shelly's Frankenstein' and 'H.G. Wells' The Time Machine' and nobody will remember the BH/KJA books even exist.
Those books are cheap knock-off cash-ins. In the long run, they're irrelevant.

The only way it does bother me is when new readers are introduced to Dune through those books and think *that* is what Dune is and they need to be persuaded to read the originals. It's like finding someone trying to subsist on a diet of mayonnaise and crackers and stubbornly refusing to consider literally any other food. I mean; why?!
 
Last edited:
(Post continues from above... again, I remind people that I have many spoilers in this; don't read it if you don't want advance knowledge of some events of the novels)



Technically, one of those already happened, since Virginia Madsen didn't have many scenes in the Lynch movie, and Irulan was trained by the Bene Gesserit (although she never went through the Water of Life ritual to become a Reverend Mother).

Whatever they do, just please don't make them look like witches who are either bald or have straggly mop hair and funny hats...


It's kind of hard to imagine anyone else in that role. :lol: The one in the miniseries was pretty forgettable.

One of my friends in college really liked the Lynch version of Piter, and practiced all the hand gestures he used when speaking to the Baron and his nephews.


No, I don't think so.

We need to remember that Irulan's role in the miniseries was expanded beyond what was in the novel, and played by an actress who was able to make her acceptable as a warm, sympathetic person caught between politics, conspiracies, and trying to find some kind of place for herself not only in the Atreides Imperium, but also as a member of the family.

The novel version of Irulan is a very cold, unlikable person in the first two books. In fact, Frank Herbert wrote a scene for Dune Messiah, in which he intended to kill her off - as one more victim of the Fremen mob intent on putting down the conspiracy against Paul. In this original version, Irulan was visiting Mohiam in prison and was caught in the wrong place at the wrong time, and was killed. I'm glad he changed his mind, since otherwise we wouldn't have had Julie Cox's excellent interpretation of her in the miniseries.

The one really stupid blunder made in the miniseries in casting the Corrino family was using Susan Sarandon as Wensicia. Irulan is the oldest, so her younger sister shouldn't be played by an actress a generation older. That was ridiculous, and Sarandon didn't seem to actually understand that Wensicia was a hard, bitter, driven woman, and not someone who indulged in hammy over-the-top showing off. The goofy hair accessories didn't help, either.

I don't think Irulan could possibly replace Margot Fenring. For one thing, it would require her to be on two planets at the same time (Margot left a message for Jessica on the underside of one of the leaves in the conservatory), and later on, Margot was assigned by the Bene Gesserit to seduce Feyd-Rautha and conceive a girl. I can't imagine Irulan pulling that off, and if she'd had a child, that would have called into question whether or not she would still be fit to be Paul's consort.


She has a very noticeable role - her writings are what introduce every new chapter. She reveals not only objective history in those, but also some personal details.


:techman:

And I think that's why, in Paul of Dune, KJA/BH deliberately retconned that. They didn't want Frank Herbert to speak through anyone. They deliberately went out of their way to say that everything she wrote in Dune was a lie that Paul told her to write, that Dune itself (the original novel that all the rest of this is based on) was nothing more than in-universe propaganda. They retconned a bunch more stuff in Winds of Dune (the Bronso of Ix nonsense), and thank goodness they didn't get around to wrecking Children of Dune.


No. Just NO. There is nothing they wrote about Irulan that doesn't show her as a pliant puppet who writes propaganda at Paul's orders.

If those two have any say at all in what goes into this movie or how it's written, it will emphasize their own drivel, retcon as much of what Frank Herbert wrote as they can get away with (really, Paul was not born on Kaitain, nor did he run away with Bronso of Ix and join the damn circus), and I predict that Norma Fucking Cenva, the millennia-old deus-ex-machina character who shows up in Sandworms of Dune to save everything will turn up somehow.


The martial arts aspect is something I don't have much problem with. After all, that's a part of how some Bene Gesserit are trained.

Rubber stillsuits were a problem. They were used in the movie because they "looked neat" - not because they were actually practical. A lot of the actors really suffered while wearing them, and in one of the scenes where Rabban is climbing up one of the dunes, the actor was thisclose to passing out (this is related in Ed Naha's behind the scenes book The Making of Dune).

And the special way the Fremen were supposed to breathe, to conserve the body's moisture... absolutely did not work in the Lynch version. The actors basically abandoned it soon after the scene where Liet-Kynes explains how to use them (which was the reverse of how it was explained in the novel).

The miniseries did a much better job of designing the stillsuits, both in aesthetics and function.

Any use of lasguns on Arrakis was frowned on, because when you get a lasgun intersecting with a shield, everything goes BOOM! in a pretty big and destructive way. That's why there's such an emphasis on knife combat and martial arts. There's much less chance of attracting a worm or causing an explosion.


I've just skimmed a few chapters of Heretics of Dune. Some chapter quotes are from Leto's journals (before his death, obviously), but most are from various Bene Gesserit sources. I don't have Chapterhouse: Dune handy, but I would think that it would be similar. Irulan is no longer the primary narrator, and that makes sense as she's been dead for thousands of years at this point and nobody saw fit to re-create her in ghola form.


Yes, you should read all of Frank Herbert's Dune novels before the rest of it (the better to understand that Frank Herbert's novels are a gourmet feast for the mind while nuDune is just slop).

I also recommend at least skimming the Dune Encyclopedia (particularly the articles about the history of the Imperium, the Spacing Guild, the Fremen, and the Butlerian Jihad). The Encyclopedia had Frank Herbert's approval - which makes it canon as far as I'm concerned, with the exception of whatever details Frank Herbert himself retconned in Heretics and Chapterhouse (as he told Dr. McNelly he might do).


There is nothing irrational in my dislike for the BH/KJA garbage. They are simplistic stories that spit on the source material (not respectfully like a Fremen, but contemptuously, to erase the rich legacy FH created in favor of their own stuff).

One part of science fiction is science... which is noticeably lacking in some pretty basic ways in nuDune. For instance, I find it hard to respect authors who don't realize that when you're fighting a space war with STL ships, relativity matters. Instead, they treat an hour on a ship as the same as an hour on Giedi Prime. Everything happens at the same rate everywhere, when it shouldn't.

And it appears also to have slipped their minds that space wars are normally fought in three dimensions, not two.


But... but Kevin J. Anderson dictates perfect prose while climbing up and down mountains, and any mistakes are his secretary's fault! He said so! :eek:

Apparently that's why his novels are so repetitious, like the reader can't be trusted to remember something from a few pages ago. Apparently he can't remember what he dictated a few pages ago, either.


Yep. Years before leaving Caladan for Arrakis... where it's explicitly stated that at age 15, Paul has never been off Caladan before.

But nooOOOooo... KJA/BH just couldn't let that stand. They not only had Paul born on Kaitain (and kidnapped), but 12 years later they had him stow away on a friggin' spaceship and join the circus! :rolleyes:


At this point, do you honestly think there were any notes beyond the unfinished manuscript for "Dune 7"?

I don't. Or at least if there were, they were nowhere near as extensive as claimed, and it's obvious that KJA/BH just ignored them anyway in favor of their killer robot and Norma Cenva, Superwoman! garbage.


No, they really don't. Frank left off with Marty and Daniel in human guise, talking about gholas and Face Dancers.

KJA/BH retconned this into Marty and Daniel being Erasmus and Omnius in disguise... which is just so damned cartoonish and an obvious declaration that Hunters/Sandworms are sequels not to Frank Herbert's version of the Dune sage, but to their own version. So 15,000 years later, characters from the Butlerian Jihad turn up (apparently they've just been sitting around twiddling their robotic thumbs for all those millennia until the Honored Matres found them in the Scattering and Norma hasn't done anything about them because she's mutated to the point that she barely remembers being human anymore and only occasionally recalls such things... fortunately in time to save everyone at the end).


Yep. Ghola-Leto gets a second chance to grow up human, and what does he do? Turns himself into a worm. Again. At least ghola-Paul and ghola-Chani are together... on a dead planet.

I don't actually remember what happened to ghola-Jessica. She was so boring, I don't even care.

And one of the creepiest things about that whole thing... in the no-ship, when Duncan's feeling lonely and discovers he's still got a strand of Murbella's hair and remembers what great sex they had... should he have a ghola made of her, so they can have great sex again? It's creepy enough if the ghola were created as an adult, but they're born as human infants are born, and Duncan would have to wait for Murbella to grow up and remember her former self and realize how skilled she is at Honored Matre and Bene Gesserit stuff, including all that great sex with Duncan...

:ack:
Wow, I'm pretty shocked to hear a son would be so disrespectful towards his father's work.
This reminds of a question I've had about a similar situation in another franchise. Is the JRR Tolkien Middle Earth stuff that's come out since his death actually written by him, or is it just his son Christopher using his name?
 
The only way it does bother me is when new readers are introduced to Dune through those books and think *that* is what Dune is and they need to be persuaded to read the originals. It's like finding someone trying to subsist on a diet of mayonnaise and crackers and stubbornly refusing to consider literally any other food. I mean; why?!
Simple. Comfort and familiarity.
 
Wow, I'm pretty shocked to hear a son would be so disrespectful towards his father's work.
This reminds of a question I've had about a similar situation in another franchise. Is the JRR Tolkien Middle Earth stuff that's come out since his death actually written by him, or is it just his son Christopher using his name?
Christopher was an Oxford don, an Inkling and aided his father in his work (such as rationalising and drafting the cartography of Middle Earth in LOTR) so I give him a pass. A lot of The Silmarillion reads like it was probably written by his father. Also, in the posthumous works, Aragorn didn't run away to join the circus in Gondor.
 
Last edited:
I'm starting to think that a good chunk of the "Dune fandom" would be well-served to chill out and not take things so seriously re: "nuDune", regardless of what they might think of the individual overall quality of what's been presented.
 
I'm starting to think that a good chunk of the "Dune fandom" would be well-served to chill out and not take things so seriously re: "nuDune", regardless of what they might think of the individual overall quality of what's been presented.
I would tend to agree if BH/KJA hadn't produced so much schlock with branding that might confuse the casual reader into thinking the posthumous work is consistent with what FH would have done with the property. Rational - perhaps not - but at least I recognise my condition and can perhaps not get too obsessed by it.
 
I don't think Frank cares too much........."What is the son but an extension of the father".
—from “Muad’Dib, Family Commentaries” by the Princess Irulan
 
Wow, I'm pretty shocked to hear a son would be so disrespectful towards his father's work.
This reminds of a question I've had about a similar situation in another franchise. Is the JRR Tolkien Middle Earth stuff that's come out since his death actually written by him, or is it just his son Christopher using his name?
I've discussed with fans who don't regard any posthumous published work from Christopher Tolkien to be canon.

And a good way to get a chronic case of mineral deficiency if you forsake all else.
A rampant condition.
 
The first trilogy they did wasn't *awful* exactly, but it really wasn't all that good either. No matter which way you cut it, none of the new stuff even comes close to equalling the quality of even the least of Frank Herbert's writings. Dune, or otherwise.

Above all else, Frank actually had things to say with his stories. Like all good science fiction they were the means by which the author and reader explored a myriad of concepts.

Brian...wants to sell books. Nothing more.
Yeah, with them it's all about the $$$$$$$$, and precious little that would inspire actual discussions about ideas. KJA brags about advances, number of copies sold, how many weeks on various lists, which mountain he was climbing when he dictated which novel (apparently there was one where he simultaneously climbed the mountain, rescued a couple of young women, and continued dictating his 'perfect prose'... how many hands and arms does he have, anyway?)... none of that actually means the books are any good, just that a particular number of people spent money on them.

My recollection of reading House Atreides is vivid, since I was in the hospital when it first came out in paperback (spent 5 weeks there). My mother knew I'd go insane without something to read, so she said, "I will buy you one book."

So I wrote out a list to choose from (not knowing exactly what might be available), and ended up with House Atreides. I was quite happy with that, since I really wanted to know if it would measure up to the hype.

Well, over the next couple of weeks I got that thing read, and the list of inconsistencies grew, the list of mischaracterizations grew, the list of things they just plain got wrong grew, and by the end of the novel, I was pretty disappointed, and rather exasperated.

So it gave me something to do in the hospital, but it wasn't anywhere near as satisfying as I'd hoped. And as the years went by and more books were published, I came to figure that KJA/BH owe an enormous act of penance to atone for all the trees that died to print this bullshit.

I really liked the Schools of Dune Series. The House Prequels were pretty good.
The Legends of Dune books were entertaining and I still think they would make good movies. The really short chapters in the books kind of threw me though - made them seem kind of choppy.
Probably won't read the Heroes again.

Nothing will ever beat the original Dune Trilogy. The rest Frank Herbert books were great - Heretics, Chapter house (I loved the Pandora Series too).
Not sure how I feel about about Sandworms of Dune - I really need to read it again.

All in all I was really glad the Dune universe did not die with Frank. So thanks KJA & BH
Hm. A very mixed set of views.

I have to admit that I haven't read either Mentats or Navigators, so I can't offer an opinion on them. I've read all the others, though, at least of the novels. I haven't read the essay books yet (The Science of Dune and Dune and Philosophy: Weirding Way of the Mentat). It looks like now would probably be a good time to remedy that.

The House books began the job of contradicting and deconstructing the real Dune, and replacing it with the nuDune bullshit. This continued with the Legends trilogy, and continued even more blatantly with the Paul and Jessica books (Paul of Dune and Winds of Dune). I'm looking at my copy of Paul of Dune and seeing those obnoxious words "The Direct Sequel to DUNE" on the front cover, like Dune Messiah never existed.

Inside they make their purpose quite clear, in one of Irulan's exerpts:
Paul of Dune said:
History is a moving target that changes as fresh details are discovered, as errors are corrected, as popular attitudes shift. Historians carve the sculpture that is Truth not out of granite, but out of wet clay.

- from the preface to The Life of Muad'Dib, Volume I, by the PRINCESS IRULAN
So... first shot fired. The book is meant to "correct" things that were "wrong" in Dune. As in Frank Herbert's novel that was the source for everything that came after.

Shot #2:
Paul of Dune said:
Many sat reading copies of Irulan's book, The Life of Muad'Dib, Volume I, a record of how Paul Atreides had left Caladan to go to Dune, how the evil Harkonnens had killed his father and destroyed his home, how he and his mother had run into the desert to the Fremen, and how he had eventually emerged to become the living legend, Paul-Muad'Dib. Printed on cheap but durable spice paper, copies of the book were given freely to any citizen who asked, and were included as part of any new soldier's kit.
<snip>
Stilgar could not quite fathom the woman's motives in writing such a story, since he could see she had gotten some of the details wrong, but neither could he deny the effectiveness of the book. Whether propaganda or inspirational religious text, the story of the most powerful man in the galaxy was spreading throughout the planets of the Imperium.
So there it is. The events of Dune relegated to Irulan writing it as "propaganda" or "inspirational religious text" and she "got some of the details wrong." Later on Irulan reminds Paul that he told her the story, she wrote it, and Shaddam IV and the Bene Gesseret are livid that Irulan's book portrayed Paul as heroic.

Later on, one of the architects of Paul's Keep in Arrakeen mentions Duncan Idaho to some of the Fremen and they say they know all about him because they read Princess Irulan's book:
Paul of Dune; p. 97-98 said:
Bludd had read the book as well and felt that Irulan had left out a great many important things, even suggesting that Paul had never been away from the planet Caladan before coming to Arrakis, ignoring all his exploits on Ecaz! That and other errors. Bludd had already spoken to the Princess about them.
The overall attitude is summed up when Irulan and Paul discuss these "discrepancies" in his life story, after Bludd has spoken to her:
Paul of Dune said:
"But if I tell a part of the story that directly contradicts what has been published before--"

"If you write it, they will believe it. Trust me."
Of course history is written by the victors, but given what was going on at the time on the various Dune sites and social media and Frank Herbert's fans pointing out all the mistakes and pointless contradictions, this was basically a "fuck you" to the original Dune novel and the original Dune novel's fans. I've seen nuDune fans totally swallow this and accept that Dune's validity as the source material is superseded by what KJA/BH wrote. And later on in the novel, we see that Irulan has begun Volume 2 of The Life of Muad'Dib and she includes all the stuff that people were bitching that she hadn't included in Volume 1.

It couldn't be plainer: Irulan essentially wrote Dune, and was compelled later to "correct" that in a following volume. NuDune "corrects" Dune, like everything that was actually written by Frank Herbert has no validity.


And there is no way in hell that Hunters/Sandworms is what Frank Herbert intended. Those are sequels to KJA/BH's books, not Chapterhouse. The rich, complex characters Frank Herbert created become cartoonish caricatures of themselves, weak-minded and superficial. They use characters from the Butlerian Jihad books, plotlines from them, and basically tie things up with the most ridiculous mess of deus ex machina and "oops, we need to wrap this up... okay, Norma comes back and saves everybody from Omnius and everybody else lives happily ever after, let's go count our royalties, ka-CHING!"

A movie based on the Butlerian Jihad that was presented in the books would have been a mindless action movie with a beautiful damsel needing to be rescued, a "love triangle", and lots of explosions and space battles and robots that would be spun off into tie-in merchandise (which I'm afraid this movie might become if KJA/BH have any say at all in the script). It would please action movie fans, but it wouldn't please me any more than nuTrek pleases me (I loathe those movies).

I'll just have the original novel. If I get one movie about the original novel that is decent I'll be pretty happy.

The constant infighting over BH/KJA and the like is tiresome and boring and can sound remarkably petty. To me, saying that the newer novels can somehow erase Frank Herbert's legacy is like saying that Peter Jackson's LOTR and the Hobbit erases Tolkien's legacy. It makes no sense.
It makes sense when you realize that the new books actually contain dialogue and text explicitly stating that the events of Dune - as written by Frank Herbert - are nothing more than in-series propaganda and not the "real" story. No, my FH books didn't vanish in a puff of smoke, but more people are being convinced that the nuDune books are the real story and Frank Herbert's books - the original six novels - are the non-canon, discontinuous stuff they can't be bothered to read because it's "too hard" or "makes them think too much."

Yeah, as much as I dislike the new stuff, I don't get anywhere near being "upset" about them. The original novels aren't going anywhere and in 100 years, 'Frank Herbert's Dune' will still be on the shelves alongside the likes of 'Mary Shelly's Frankenstein' and 'H.G. Wells' The Time Machine' and nobody will remember the BH/KJA books even exist.
Those books are cheap knock-off cash-ins. In the long rung, they're irrelevant.

The only way it does bother me is when new readers are introduced to Dune through those books and think *that* is what Dune is and they need to be persuaded to read the originals. It's like finding someone trying to subsist on a diet of mayonnaise and crackers and stubbornly refusing to consider literally any other food. I mean; why?!
Exactly.

And I'm going to take a moment to criticize some of Frank Herbert's fans: There are a couple of forums where some of them have stated "The Anderson/Herbert books are shit, they're garbage, I know so because _____ told me, and I'll never read any of them!"

My response: We'll be taken more seriously if we actually know wtf we're talking about when we criticize the nuDune books. That's one of the reasons I've continued to read them, long after accepting that they probably would never get any better. If I'm going to criticize a series of books, I'd best know why I'm criticizing it. So please note that I'm not telling anyone not to read the nuDune books. I am telling folks here why they don't measure up to Frank Herbert's original novels.

Oh, and to everyone bringing up the Hobbit, Lord of the Rings, and the movies associated with them: I haven't read more than a few pages of The Hobbit (didn't care for it) and have never seen the movies. I won't know what you're talking about.

Wow, I'm pretty shocked to hear a son would be so disrespectful towards his father's work.
This reminds of a question I've had about a similar situation in another franchise. Is the JRR Tolkien Middle Earth stuff that's come out since his death actually written by him, or is it just his son Christopher using his name?
Apparently Brian had ongoing issues with Frank over a number of decades. He's simultaneously belittling his father's legacy while also shamelessly using it for profit, while pretending that this is what FH wanted all along.

As far as I'm concerned, if there ever were any notes, they should publish them. Literary scholars would love to study them and discuss them - the history of science fiction is a legitimate academic field, and there are lots of fans who would love to read them as well.

They've stopped doing new novels now, so there's really no reason not to publish the notes. Unless, of course, they never existed, or they did exist but not as extensively as claimed (the story kept changing over the years), or they exist, but were totally ignored. I'm leaning toward some combination of this, and all of KJA's protestations of "why would anybody be interested in them" is just so much deflection.

The only Dune-related thing Brian Herbert wrote that I did like was the biography he wrote about his father (Dreamer of Dune). It's an interesting read.

I'm starting to think that a good chunk of the "Dune fandom" would be well-served to chill out and not take things so seriously re: "nuDune", regardless of what they might think of the individual overall quality of what's been presented.
As a reminder, you previously said:
DigificWriter said:
I'm not sure if this is the best place to ask this question since this thread is about a new Dune movie and not the novels, but I'm asking it here anyway: do I need to read Frank Herbert's Dune novels before reading Brian Herbert and Kevin J. Anderson's Hunters of Dune and Sandworms of Dune?

The reason I'm asking is that I eventually want to read all of Dune, but would like to separate Brian and Kevin's stuff from Frank's because of the differences in writing style.
You're being given serious answers to your question, which can be summed up as "Yes, you need to read Frank Herbert's novels first." Otherwise the rest of it won't make much sense, at least if you want more than just the cartoon version.

I would tend to agree if BH/KJA hadn't produced so much schlock with branding that might confuse the casual reader into thinking the posthumous work is consistent with what FH would have done with the property. Rational - perhaps not - but at least I recognise my condition and can perhaps not get too obsessed by it.
Some here might think I'm obsessed... but it's a case of "you had to have been there" as to why some of this bothers me so much. There were fan discussions between the two camps that turned from discussions into feuds, and there were actually a couple of people who went after KJA on social media to the extent of not only being utterly vicious to him, but also to his wife and family. That's crossing a line - disliking and criticizing the books is okay. Slagging the authors' wives and extended families is not okay.

I don't think Frank cares too much........."What is the son but an extension of the father".
—from “Muad’Dib, Family Commentaries” by the Princess Irulan
I don't think he would be pleased at the disgusting mess they wrote that purports to be "Dune 7". FFS, I saw a fanfic version of "Dune 7" that was more in keeping with what FH would have written than the drivel we actually got.

Why does it matter?
You're the one who asked if you should read FH's books first. Apparently it matters enough to you to have asked.
 
You're the one who asked if you should read FH's books first. Apparently it matters enough to you to have asked.

I was asking from a perspective of narrative in order to determine whether or not my intention to read the two "halves" of the franchise separately would work.

I did get the answer I was looking for, but what I wasn't looking for is comments about how the "nuDune" stuff is an insult to Frank's "OG!Dune " stuff and how it only exists because of exploitation, which is what prompted my comment about some people taking the franchise way too seriously.
 
Last edited:
I was asking from a perspective of narrative in order to determine whether or not my intention to read the two "halves" of the franchise separately would work.

I did get the answer I was looking for, but what I wasn't looking for is comments about how the "nuDune" stuff is an insult to Frank's "OG!Dune " stuff and how it only exists because of exploitation, which is what prompted my comment about some people taking the franchise way too seriously.
You were certainly not required to read anything I posted that didn't deal specifically with your question. After all, I addressed quite a few other people and various points.

As for what order you read this in, I still recommend all of Frank Herbert's material first. If you don't, you'll be confused because Dune and nuDune are contradictory in both narrative and in style.
 
^ You aren't the only one who posted comments about how and why "nuDune" shouldn't exist, which is why I chose to address the attitudes being expressed.
 
Yeah, with them it's all about the $$$$$$$$, and precious little that would inspire actual discussions about ideas. KJA brags about advances, number of copies sold, how many weeks on various lists, which mountain he was climbing when he dictated which novel (apparently there was one where he simultaneously climbed the mountain, rescued a couple of young women, and continued dictating his 'perfect prose'... how many hands and arms does he have, anyway?)... none of that actually means the books are any good, just that a particular number of people spent money on them.

My recollection of reading House Atreides is vivid, since I was in the hospital when it first came out in paperback (spent 5 weeks there). My mother knew I'd go insane without something to read, so she said, "I will buy you one book."

So I wrote out a list to choose from (not knowing exactly what might be available), and ended up with House Atreides. I was quite happy with that, since I really wanted to know if it would measure up to the hype.

Well, over the next couple of weeks I got that thing read, and the list of inconsistencies grew, the list of mischaracterizations grew, the list of things they just plain got wrong grew, and by the end of the novel, I was pretty disappointed, and rather exasperated.

So it gave me something to do in the hospital, but it wasn't anywhere near as satisfying as I'd hoped. And as the years went by and more books were published, I came to figure that KJA/BH owe an enormous act of penance to atone for all the trees that died to print this bullshit.


Hm. A very mixed set of views.

I have to admit that I haven't read either Mentats or Navigators, so I can't offer an opinion on them. I've read all the others, though, at least of the novels. I haven't read the essay books yet (The Science of Dune and Dune and Philosophy: Weirding Way of the Mentat). It looks like now would probably be a good time to remedy that.

The House books began the job of contradicting and deconstructing the real Dune, and replacing it with the nuDune bullshit. This continued with the Legends trilogy, and continued even more blatantly with the Paul and Jessica books (Paul of Dune and Winds of Dune). I'm looking at my copy of Paul of Dune and seeing those obnoxious words "The Direct Sequel to DUNE" on the front cover, like Dune Messiah never existed.

Inside they make their purpose quite clear, in one of Irulan's exerpts:

So... first shot fired. The book is meant to "correct" things that were "wrong" in Dune. As in Frank Herbert's novel that was the source for everything that came after.

Shot #2:
So there it is. The events of Dune relegated to Irulan writing it as "propaganda" or "inspirational religious text" and she "got some of the details wrong." Later on Irulan reminds Paul that he told her the story, she wrote it, and Shaddam IV and the Bene Gesseret are livid that Irulan's book portrayed Paul as heroic.

Later on, one of the architects of Paul's Keep in Arrakeen mentions Duncan Idaho to some of the Fremen and they say they know all about him because they read Princess Irulan's book:
The overall attitude is summed up when Irulan and Paul discuss these "discrepancies" in his life story, after Bludd has spoken to her:
Of course history is written by the victors, but given what was going on at the time on the various Dune sites and social media and Frank Herbert's fans pointing out all the mistakes and pointless contradictions, this was basically a "fuck you" to the original Dune novel and the original Dune novel's fans. I've seen nuDune fans totally swallow this and accept that Dune's validity as the source material is superseded by what KJA/BH wrote. And later on in the novel, we see that Irulan has begun Volume 2 of The Life of Muad'Dib and she includes all the stuff that people were bitching that she hadn't included in Volume 1.

It couldn't be plainer: Irulan essentially wrote Dune, and was compelled later to "correct" that in a following volume. NuDune "corrects" Dune, like everything that was actually written by Frank Herbert has no validity.


And there is no way in hell that Hunters/Sandworms is what Frank Herbert intended. Those are sequels to KJA/BH's books, not Chapterhouse. The rich, complex characters Frank Herbert created become cartoonish caricatures of themselves, weak-minded and superficial. They use characters from the Butlerian Jihad books, plotlines from them, and basically tie things up with the most ridiculous mess of deus ex machina and "oops, we need to wrap this up... okay, Norma comes back and saves everybody from Omnius and everybody else lives happily ever after, let's go count our royalties, ka-CHING!"

A movie based on the Butlerian Jihad that was presented in the books would have been a mindless action movie with a beautiful damsel needing to be rescued, a "love triangle", and lots of explosions and space battles and robots that would be spun off into tie-in merchandise (which I'm afraid this movie might become if KJA/BH have any say at all in the script). It would please action movie fans, but it wouldn't please me any more than nuTrek pleases me (I loathe those movies).


It makes sense when you realize that the new books actually contain dialogue and text explicitly stating that the events of Dune - as written by Frank Herbert - are nothing more than in-series propaganda and not the "real" story. No, my FH books didn't vanish in a puff of smoke, but more people are being convinced that the nuDune books are the real story and Frank Herbert's books - the original six novels - are the non-canon, discontinuous stuff they can't be bothered to read because it's "too hard" or "makes them think too much."


Exactly.

And I'm going to take a moment to criticize some of Frank Herbert's fans: There are a couple of forums where some of them have stated "The Anderson/Herbert books are shit, they're garbage, I know so because _____ told me, and I'll never read any of them!"

My response: We'll be taken more seriously if we actually know wtf we're talking about when we criticize the nuDune books. That's one of the reasons I've continued to read them, long after accepting that they probably would never get any better. If I'm going to criticize a series of books, I'd best know why I'm criticizing it. So please note that I'm not telling anyone not to read the nuDune books. I am telling folks here why they don't measure up to Frank Herbert's original novels.

Oh, and to everyone bringing up the Hobbit, Lord of the Rings, and the movies associated with them: I haven't read more than a few pages of The Hobbit (didn't care for it) and have never seen the movies. I won't know what you're talking about.


Apparently Brian had ongoing issues with Frank over a number of decades. He's simultaneously belittling his father's legacy while also shamelessly using it for profit, while pretending that this is what FH wanted all along.

As far as I'm concerned, if there ever were any notes, they should publish them. Literary scholars would love to study them and discuss them - the history of science fiction is a legitimate academic field, and there are lots of fans who would love to read them as well.

They've stopped doing new novels now, so there's really no reason not to publish the notes. Unless, of course, they never existed, or they did exist but not as extensively as claimed (the story kept changing over the years), or they exist, but were totally ignored. I'm leaning toward some combination of this, and all of KJA's protestations of "why would anybody be interested in them" is just so much deflection.

The only Dune-related thing Brian Herbert wrote that I did like was the biography he wrote about his father (Dreamer of Dune). It's an interesting read.


As a reminder, you previously said:

You're being given serious answers to your question, which can be summed up as "Yes, you need to read Frank Herbert's novels first." Otherwise the rest of it won't make much sense, at least if you want more than just the cartoon version.


Some here might think I'm obsessed... but it's a case of "you had to have been there" as to why some of this bothers me so much. There were fan discussions between the two camps that turned from discussions into feuds, and there were actually a couple of people who went after KJA on social media to the extent of not only being utterly vicious to him, but also to his wife and family. That's crossing a line - disliking and criticizing the books is okay. Slagging the authors' wives and extended families is not okay.


I don't think he would be pleased at the disgusting mess they wrote that purports to be "Dune 7". FFS, I saw a fanfic version of "Dune 7" that was more in keeping with what FH would have written than the drivel we actually got.


You're the one who asked if you should read FH's books first. Apparently it matters enough to you to have asked.
Forgive me ... I haven't read it, and probably couldn't get through it anyway, but I'm so fascinated by this. I'm not trying to be snarky or anything, believe me, but this is -- literally -- the longest post I have ever, personally, seen on this site.
 
^ You aren't the only one who posted comments about how and why "nuDune" shouldn't exist, which is why I chose to address the attitudes being expressed.
I don't believe nuDune shouldn't exist. I'm mostly disappointed - well, borderline angry in the past - that its general quality is so poor and that it reads like revisionist history while casting that aspersion on FH's original novels. If FH chose not to request that no-one be allowed to write continuation novels then so be it. Perhaps he thought it was a good way to help provide for his family's financial security and couldn't give two hoots about his legacy being potentially tarnished.

I believe the late Iain M Banks specified that no-one is permitted to write Culture novels after his death until the copyright expires. I wonder how common it is for writers to specify such a restriction.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top