• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Casting Pike's Number One

No, there isn't. I couldn't agree with you more than I do. All due respect to Mr. Cox (and others novelists), but the hoops that have been jumped through the last 50 years trying to explain why that character was called "Number One" are beyond ridiculous. Especially after we had another captain use the term for another XO in TNG. Of course this is Trek fandom. Why use a simple explanation when there is a much more convoluted and silly explanation to be found?

You're exaggerating. There are only two "explanations," one of which is that she has a name that no one in authority over The Canon ever bothered to nail down, so it's different every time (just like the good old days with Walter Sulu and Penda Uhura), or that she's an alien, her personal name is unpronounceable, and "Number One" doesn't just reflect her rank on the ship, but, coincidentally, her position in the meritocracy of her home planet. I grant you, that's a bit of a stretch, but it does come from Majel Barrett and D.C. Fontana, so I think they're entitled to think of some complicated wackadoodle sci-fi worldbuilding with regard to this TOS character, out of all TOS characters.

Considering the sources, my top preference would be that they go with "Una," implicitly canonizing the Barrett/Fontana backstory, then punting and continuing to just call her "Number One," then just inventing some random name, with my least-preferred option being to pick one of the conventional names she's been given in a book or comic. Using "Una" also has the benefit of not shooting DSC's cross-medium aspirations in the head like a crippled horse over something incredibly petty. "We'll coordinate closely on the novels, and draw on them for backstory, and we'll only contradict them if it's for something really important, or if we want to establish a legacy character's name as our own mark on history."
 
Given that mystery is integral to the original character and Bryan Fuller intended for Michael Burnham to be constantly referred to as Number One, I would prefer that her full name remained a secret to the audience, with Pike calling Romijn 'Number One' and her subordinates calling her 'sir' or by her rank. It would be a running gag but would show just how professional she is or how The Cage scripts put it 'Almost glacier-like in her imperturbability and precision. From time to time we'll wonder just how much female exists'.
 
In general, it's a bad idea for an author to try to defend his work. (Even if you're right, you look like a dick.) But this is less about my book than an interesting bit of Trek lore, so . . ...

I would argue that Riker and "Number One" are different situations. There was never any mystery about Riker's name. He was First Officer William Riker and that was that. By contrast, Roddenberry's original description of Piker's First Officer stressed that she was an enigmatic woman known only as "Number One." So the absence of her name was always meant to be kinda cool and mysterious.

That being the case, it would be be something of letdown to discover that she was . . . First Officer Carol Smith.

As for why we gave her a name in the first place:

She's not a first officer in the LEGACIES trilogy. She's a seasoned starship captain and (in flashbacks) a promising young lieutenant. Clearly, this posed a problem. We could hardly call her "Captain Number One" or "Lieutenant Number One." :)

Hence, Una. With a tip of the hat back to the old D.C. Fontana backstory.

That was our reasoning at least. YMMV.
 
Last edited:
Isn't "Bones" an old nickname for doctors that dates back to the Civil War? Bones, as in saw-bones...which is basically all doctors could do back then (on the battlefield).
 
Last edited:
Short for sawbones. But that doesn't have to be the only reason to call someone "bones".
But if the person is a doctor, then that surely is the reason! This is like explaining that a Captain that is referred as 'skipper' is called such because she used to skip classes back in the academy. It is just painfully embarrassing demonstration that the person who wrote that is not familiar with the etymology of the word.
 
But if the person is a doctor, then that surely is the reason! This is like explaining that a Captain that is referred as 'skipper' is called such because she used to skip classes back in the academy. It is just painfully embarrassing demonstration that the person who wrote that is not familiar with the etymology of the word.

It was an ad-lib by Karl Urban according to an above post. I'm sure the writers of the movie knew.
 
But if the person is a doctor, then that surely is the reason! This is like explaining that a Captain that is referred as 'skipper' is called such because she used to skip classes back in the academy. It is just painfully embarrassing demonstration that the person who wrote that is not familiar with the etymology of the word.
Urban's not an American, so that may not be a common term in New Zealand. . Though I am an American and as a kid I thought McCoy was called "Bones" because he was skinny.
 
Urban's ad-lib makes a hell of a lot more sense than somehow assuming Number One is an alien or something like that just because nobody calls her by name.
 
Urban's ad-lib makes a hell of a lot more sense than somehow assuming Number One is an alien or something like that just because nobody calls her by name.

Your commitment to taking a stand against Dorthy Fontana, Majel Barrett, and Gene Roddenberry about Number One's backstory is commendable, but, I have to say, probably misguided.
 
Your commitment to taking a stand against Dorthy Fontana, Majel Barrett, and Gene Roddenberry

That might be overstating it a TON.

Of course I respect the opinions and credentials of all of those people. I'm not reflexively trying to deny everything they said or wrote.

But I also respect common sense. As I said, everybody knows that "Number One" is a common nickname for an XO. We've known that even before William Riker came along. Unless there's an in-universe REASON to suspect anything more complicated than that, in regards to our Number One... then why do it?

It's like what @Longinus said about the term "skipper". Everybody knows it just means "captain", so why go through the trouble of reinventing it? It's just going to look silly.
 
Last edited:
That might be overstating it a TON.

Of course I respect the opinions and credentials of all of them. I'm not reflexively trying to deny everything they said or wrote.

But I also respect common sense. As I said, everybody knows that "Number One" is a common nickname for an XO. Unless there's an in-universe REASON to suspect anything more complicated than that, in regards to our Number One, then why do it? It's like what @Longinus said about the term "skipper". Everybody knows what that word means, so why go through the trouble of reinventing it?
And I'm pretty sure that's were Roddenberry got the name from.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top