@fireproof78 I like you. And I really don't want to turn this thread into a politics discussion. But every time someone repeats that "The founders" and "tyranny of the majority" oxymoron, it painfully shows they either don't know what they are talking about, or are willfully repeating far rightwing lies. Which are btw not even that old, this is purely a lie invented to justify the election of Donald Trump (and Bush before) as the president, while in both cases more people directly voted for the competitor. That's why this has never, ever showed up in history, school or anything before, and comes purely from Fox news and radiohosts in the last few years.
The original intents of the founders was a
representative Republic. Which has the main characteristics that, you know, it should be
representitive of the people in it.
The only thing the Founders really "intentionally" wanted to avoid was the election of a populistic demagogue or monarch. That is what the electoral college with it's electors was put in place for.
But when the Republic was founded, all states had a somewhat equal distribution of population. There simply weren't any megastates with 80 mio. people in them in the first place. Urbanisation happened
A LOT later. The electoral college simply was the best possible means to have the closest representation possible at the time.
The only (big!) part where the founders cheated, and actively
didn't wanted perfectly equal representation, was the 3/5th compromise - where they counted the population of slaves as 3/5 of "regular" citizens for allocating vote shares, because the South had a much smaller white population as the North, but a large slave population. The number was selected arbitrary, to give both parts of the country a somewhat equal weight (the South wouldn't have accepted being able to be outvoted - especially on their slave thingy - but the North didn't want to allocate the vote shares of slaves which had no say in their representation to their slaveholders - thus giving them
even more unwarranted representation). That shit is still in the constitution btw.
But never assume America was founded under the belive "rural" voters should be represented equally as "urban" voters - there simply wasn't such a divide at the time. The only thing they wanted - explicitly - is the closest possible represantitive system that is possible to implement at the time. Honestly, if they had the technological means to
have a count of every single vote on federal level - they would have done it.