A single source does not a reflection make.I think the implication is that they are tuning in greater numbers to see TNG and Voyager than other Trek but somehow that is not a reflection of 'popularity'??
A single source does not a reflection make.I think the implication is that they are tuning in greater numbers to see TNG and Voyager than other Trek but somehow that is not a reflection of 'popularity'??
Because people make those kinds of connections all the time. They watch the show, like Red, go to IMDB, find Kate, see Voyager, and decide to check it out.Ohhhhhhh. Interesting connection.
More of a question of marketability. In other words, could that be rebooted in a way to appeal to the general audience? While TNG and VOY are not my favorites, I also don't see as much interest in them to continue them on.I think the implication is that they are tuning in greater numbers to see TNG and Voyager than other Trek but somehow that is not a reflection of 'popularity'??
Discovery isn't an actual reboot of TOS though is it? Oh it is desperately trying to suck off its associations with the Mother Show and in the process it is rather all over the place. Anything TNG or Voyager related would be more in their timelines. If it wanted to name drop then so be it, but Discovery has set itself up to directly fit in with TOS.More of a question of marketability. In other words, could that be rebooted in a way to appeal to the general audience? While TNG and VOY are not my favorites, I also don't see as much interest in them to continue them on.
I could be wrong, but the current mass appeal of TNG or VOY has never been apparent to me.![]()
I could also argue that VOY is the second-least popular series given that it has the second-least amount of discussions initiated in its own Trek BBS forum for any series that has at least 3 seasons.I think the implication is that they are tuning in greater numbers to see TNG and Voyager than other Trek but somehow that is not a reflection of 'popularity'??
Yeah I know.Huh? I was defending TNG and Voyagers popularity
![]()
Because people make those kinds of connections all the time. They watch the show, like Red, go to IMDB, find Kate, see Voyager, and decide to check it out.
And I'm sure it's very likely Voyager shows up in their 'You May Also Like' lists. I have no idea. It's certainly there when I watch Orange/Black, but then I also watch the BattleStar TrekWars SG-5 stuff.
Er... if you wanted to. It's a pretty well visited forum though. If you wanted to argue that then that would be within the stats of this forum.I could also argue that VOY is the second-least popular series given that it has the second-least amount of discussions initiated in its own Trek BBS forum for any series that has at least 3 seasons.
See how that works? I can make any wild ass assumption based on context-less data that I want.
This is why data is dangerous. Especially incomplete data without full context.
And how it would TNG or VOY be any different?Discovery isn't an actual reboot of TOS though is it? Oh it is desperately trying to suck off its associations with the Mother Show and in the process it is rather all over the place. Anything TNG or Voyager related would be more in their timelines. If it wanted to name drop then so be it, but Discovery has set itself up to directly fit in with TOS.
Ok, that's a fact. Does that mean a reboot or spinoff of that show is sustainable? That's the question.The 'argument' that Voyager contains the most re-watched eps of Trek on Netflix still stands though. It's fact.
Yes it does.A single source does not a reflection make.
No, it doesn't. It indicates that within a small niche (i.e. those who have Netflix) find rewatch value in a show. Does that demonstrate broader appeal?Yes it does.
I've never Orange is the New Black. I tend to think people who watch Star Trek just like that type of thing. Genre and all.Sure, makes sense. Your theory is certainly plausible too. I sort of doubt there's much overlap between OITNB fans and people who are inclined to check out random (to them) episodes of Star Trek, but maybe!
Yes it does. Beside the fact a reflection doesn't have a set quantifier ... a lot of people have Neflix.No, it doesn't. It indicates that within a small niche (i.e. those who have Netflix) find rewatch value in a show. Does that demonstrate broader appeal?
I've never Orange is the New Black. I tend to think people who watch Star Trek just like that type of thing. Genre and all.
Welcome to the wonderful world of confirmation bias and statistical analysis. If you have a single source, your sample size is tiny, meaning your margin for error increases significantly.Yes it does.
Q1 2018 statistics showed 125 million people worldwide subscribe. 56.71 million are from the US. That's 1.6% of the worldwide population, and 17% of the US population. It's not as many people as you might think.Yes it does. Beside the fact a reflection doesn't have a set quantifier ... a lot of people have Neflix.
Sample size is important, as @Firebird noted . So, it reflects within that sample. Hard to make broad generalizations from that sample size.Yes it does. Beside the fact a reflection doesn't have a set quantifier ... a lot of people have Neflix.
Precisely. Stupid stats class coming back to be relevant.Welcome to the wonderful world of confirmation bias and statistical analysis. If you have a single source, your sample size is tiny, meaning your margin for error increases significantly.
What about no?
That kind of thing appeals to a tiny number of people who really are deeply invested in Star Trek. "Starfleet" is a word that trekkies are invested in, and words like "Orion Syndicate" give them goosebumps.
Trek was created and succeeded as a very broad kind of action/dramatic show, a pretty smart show that eventually developed into a sort of workplace drama with Spandex wardrobe and the occasional ray-gun blast - and in the process reached an evolutionary cul-de-sac that saw its audience wither away and drift to other entertainments that offered more novelty and more depth.
Fans hate it, but Abrams was right, as MacFarlane is right: if Trek doesn't go big again it will just go away.
The only two things I remember that actually kinda clash with canon are the cloaking stuff (but to be fair Enterprise kinda screwed that up already) and the Spore Drive (which I expect to be phased out later in the series)
An episodic series with catsuits, lots of technobabble and liberal use of the reset button?![]()
Additionally, all that potentially means to me is that people own the home media versions of TOS because it's worth it to them, and will more frequently do a "browse drive-by" of the TNG era stuff on Netflix.
That is why the word 'reflection' is appropriate. You do realise that these same viewers could watch any Trek? They chose to watch what interested them via Netflix. That is how ratings are derived. It is still a source to see audience interest. If you want broader information then go to other sources but that doesn't negate Neflix stats or audience.Sample size is important, as @Firebird noted . So, it reflects within that sample. Hard to make broad generalizations from that sample size.
Precisely. Stupid stats class coming back to be relevant.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.