• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Discovery Showrunners fired; Kurtzman takes over

Because time doesn't exist in the Star Trek universe? I for one see no problem in having Star Trek characters call out the hypocrisy of how certain characters who have acted rather inappropriately despite their numerous occasions at how they declare themselves to be so enlightened. To 'ignore' such aspects is akin to saying that racism and sexism never existed at all.
Have you people noticed how some are taking Star Trek world kinda too seriously?
 
I loved ST'09 and Into Darkness, so I'm cool with Kurtzman being in charge.

But not so cool with him picking up someone else's work-in-progress who was fired because DISCO is a BTS clusterfuck. Hoping it doesn't end with a damp squib finale like S1 did where it really felt like someone different was brought in to figure out and tie up loose ends.

Oh well. Guessing BTS strife is the show's "thing" now.:shrug:

I think BTS Strife is every Trek show's thing. Except DS9 and maybe Enterprise.

Jason
 
It's no secret I wasn't a fan of Harberts. But that was when I just thought it was pretty clear he was in over his head and unqualified as a leader. I had no idea about the abuse, obviously. I don't really know enough about Berg, but it sounds like she wasn't much better.
On the one hand, to the extent I was disappointed with S1 of DSC and the showrunners obviously have to bear some responsibility for that, I suppose I'm glad they're gone.

On the other hand, I don't for a minute believe the ostensible reason they're gone. Writers' rooms are famously contentious on lots of shows, with strong opinions and strong language being tossed about. Hollywood has no shortage of egos, after all. That's usually swept under the rug and only revealed years after the fact, though; it's hardly ever treated as a reason to fire anyone if a show is otherwise performing well. Going public with a story like this is the equivalent of saying someone is "hard to work with"; it seems like a deliberate effort to sabotage the career(s) involved.

On the other other hand, whatever the real issues on the show, it's bizarre that the PTB at CBS are insisting they're not creative ones at the moment they have the best possible excuse to admit that creative issues exist(ed). This suggests that the folks in charge unfortunately still remain either oblivious or deeply in denial about the real problems with the show's writing. Indeed, if they had been cognizant of them, the obvious time to make a change would have been between seasons.

the last connection to the Fuller vision for STD is gone. The show can basically go a new direction at this point. My guess is the heavy "future is female" aspects of the series and extreme left politics will be toned down as well
I wouldn't mind a new creative direction for DSC. (I wouldn't mind a creative direction, period.) But seriously, what "extreme left politics"? :wtf: Notwithstanding some misplaced ire over casting choices, overall the show's been about as political as an apple pie recipe, especially compared to past Trek shows. I like leftist politics, and I sure haven't seen any on DSC.

The bad news is Kurtzman is still the showrunner. He is mediocre. After Star Trek Into Darkness, this guy should not have been given any more Trek properties to work on.
On this, at least, we can completely agree.

On the bright side, it's nice that Akiva Goldsman is gone too; he's arguably even more of a hack than Kurtzman, and was actually personally involved in writing two of the worst installments of S1, the beginning and the end.

if the showrunners don't understand how their own show is playing, that's when you give up, because they'll never be able to fix the problems if they can't even correctly diagnose them.
For all those people who worry about Kurtzman being in charge, just remember in normal work offices, you can have very mediocre bosses, but amazing talented people working for them, which makes all the difference.
That's the less bright side. Who exactly is left on the DSC writing staff at this point? Ted Sullivan, who penned what was IMHO S1's single worst episode, the Lorca heel turn? What about the evangelical Christian hacks hired between seasons, presumably by Berg and Harberts — are they still around? If so, then again this suggests that no one in power actually grasps (or cares about) the creative problems of this show. If there's any reason to believe it's a group of "amazingly talented people," I haven't heard about it.

Joss has his own #metoo issues
No, he doesn't. Whedon cheated on his wife; he didn't harass anybody. That's a personal matter, not a legal one.

I doubt he's cheap either for a show that's over budget.
This, though, you're right about. Whedon wrote and directed two of the most successful movies of all time. He can pretty much write his own ticket, and he doesn't have to take any job he doesn't want to.

I at least trust Kurtzman not to do anything monumentally stupid and wrong with Star Trek. Most of Into Darkness' problems were from Abrams and Lindelof. Orci and Kurtzman just kinda had to follow a template they were given and flesh it out.
I think you're handwaving away a lot of blame that deserves to fall squarely on him and Orci. Lindelof has at least written other thought-provoking, entertaining things. Kurzman and Orci, not so much.
 
This stuff makes you think about some of the writers who left during season 1. Even though I am into conspiracy stuff enough to buy into some secret motive other than them being jerks the writers who left makes me think it might be credible.

Jason
 
I do wonder how a two person team actually works. I mean it seemed to work fine on the show "Episodes" but in real life what if one person wants to do one thing and the other wants to do something else?

Jason
 
You know what I just thought about? It's going to be kind of awkward when the fired writers have to go up on stage with the rest of show's creators to collect that Emmy they are going for. How will that Emmy speech, go?


Jason
 
He got some of the actors playing security guards to disarm Berg and Herberts, because he was afraid of a mutiny.
 
Judging by how poorly written some of these episodes were I don't think there was enough yelling going on in the writer's room.
 
I take it the wonderful Kirsten Beyer is still on the writing staff ?

She was still there as of a couple of weeks ago when the Star Trek Room twitter sent out this tweet:

https://twitter.com/StarTrekRoom/status/999421981136056320

You've got Harberts, Berg, Beyer, Ted Sullivan, Bo Yeon Kim, Erika Lippoldt, Vaun Wilmott and Alan McElroy all pictured. Not sure who the other writers in the photo are beyond those.

Sullivan, Lippoldt and Kim have been tweeting regularly about show related stuff as of this week (Kim said she was working on a script Sunday night). Sean Cochran was tweeting from Toronto a couple of weeks back so he was presumably on set for an episode and is still on staff as well.
 
Last edited:
Wow, I didn‘t see that coming! They always seemed to be okay people, judging from interviews. I didn‘t see what others were seeing in their behaviour. But since I surely wasn‘t the biggest fan of season one‘s writing, I can only hope it improves with their demise. If only they left earlier. In the middle of the production of the second season seems like a bad moment. Also, I‘m not convinced the remaining writers will fare better with Berg/Harberts gone. Well, we‘ll see ...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top